Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs

Biology Letters

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 456-458

  Blackledge, Todd A ^a   Eliason, Chad M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Araneidae; Behavioural correlations; Phenotypic plasticity; Silk; Tradeoff; Web efficiency

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SPIDER;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPIDERS;

EID: 35548940306     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0218     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blackledge, T. A. & Zevenbergen, J. M. 2006 Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs. Ethology 112, 1194-1201. (doi:10.1111/j.1439- 0310.2006.01277.x)
2. Chacón, P. & Eberhard, W. G. 1980 Factors affecting numbers and kinds of prey caught in artificial spider webs, with considerations of how orb webs trap prey. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 5, 29-38.
3. Craig, C. L. 1987 The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30, 135-162.
4. Eberhard, W. G. 1990 Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 341-372. (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002013)
5. Heiling, A. M. & Herberstein, M. E. 1998 The web of Nuctenea sclopetaria (Araneae, Araneidae): relationship between body size and web design. J. Arachnol. 26, 91-96.
6. Herberstein, M. E. & Heiling, A. M. 1998 Does mesh height influence prey length in orb-web spiders (Ara-neae)? Eur. J. Entomol. 95, 367-371.
7. Horton, C. C. & Wise, D. H. 1983 The experimental analysis of competition between two syntopic species of orb web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). Ecology 64, 929-944. (doi:10.2307/1937214)
8. Nentwig, W. 1982 Why do certain insects escape from a spider's web? Oecologia (Berlin) 53, 412-417. (doi:10. 1007/BF00389023)
9. Olive, C. W. 1980 Foraging specializations in orb-weaving spiders. Ecology 61, 1133-1144. (doi:10.2307/1936833)
10. Opell, B. D. & Bond, J. E. 2001 Changes in the mechanical properties of capture threads and the evolution of modern orb-weaving spiders. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 567-581.
11. Opell, B. D., Bond, J. E. & Warner, D. A. 2006 The effects of capture spiral composition and orb-web orientation on prey interception. Zoology 109, 339-345. (doi:10. 1016/j.zool.2006.04.002)
12. Podos, J. & Hendry, A. P. 2006 The biomechanics of ecological speciation. In Ecology and biomechanics: a mechanical approach to the ecology of animals and plants (eds A. Herrel, T. Speck & N. P. Rowe), pp. 301-321. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
13. Sandoval, C. P. 1994 Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata\a response to variable prey type. Funct. Ecol. 8, 701-707. (doi:10.2307/2390229)
14. Schneider, J. M. & Vollrath, F. 1998 The effect of prey type on the geometry of the capture web of Araneus diadema-tus. Naturwissenschaften 85, 391-394. (doi:10.1007/s001140050521)
15. Sherman, P. M. 1994 The orb web\an energetic and behavioral estimator of a spiders dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies. Anim. Behav. 48, 19-34. (doi:10. 1006/anbe.1994.1208)
16. Sih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C. & Ziemba, R. E. 2004 Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 241-277. (doi:10.1086/422893)
17. Tso, I. M. & Severinghaus, L. L. 1998 Ingested biomass of prey as a more accurate estimator of foraging intake by spider predators. J. Arachnol. 26, 405-407.
18. Venner, S. & Casas, J. 2005 Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1587-1592. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005. 3114)