The common house spider alters the material and mechanical properties of cobweb silk in response to different prey

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology

Volumn 309, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 542-552

  Boutry, Cecilia ^a   Blackledge, Todd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; ELASTICITY; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SILK; SPIDER; TENSILE STRENGTH; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; DIET; ELASTICITY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SILK; SPIDERS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACHAEARANEA TEPIDARIORUM; ARANEAE; GRYLLIDAE; ONISCIDEA;

EID: 57749201564     PISSN: 19325223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.487     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ap Rhisiart A, Vollrath F. 1994. Design-features of the orb web of the spider, Araneus diadematus. Behav Ecol 5:280-287.
2. Argintean S, Chen J, Kim M, Moore AMF. 2006. Resilient silk captures prey in black widow cobwebs. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 82:235-241.
3. Ayoub NA, Garb JE, Tinghitella RM, Collin MA, Hayashi CY. 2007. Blueprint for a high-performance biomaterial: full-length spider dragline silk genes. PLoS One 2:154-166.
4. Benjamin SP, Zschokke S. 2002. Untangling the tangle-web: web construction behavior of the comb-footed spider Steatoda triangulosa and comments on phylogenetic implications (Araneae: Theridiidae). J Insect Behav 15: 791-809.
5. Benjamin SP, Zschokke S. 2003. Webs of theridiid spiders: construction, structure and evolution. Biol J Linnean Soc 78:293-305.
6. Blackledge TA, Zevenbergen JM. 2007. Condition-dependent spider web architecture in the western black widow, Latrodectus hesperus. Anim Behav 73:855-864.
7. Blackledge TA, Cardullo RA, Hayashi CY. 2005a. Polarized light microscopy, variability in spider silk diameters, and the mechanical characterization of spider silk. Invert Biol 124:165-173.
8. Blackledge TA, Summers AP, Hayashi CY. 2005b. Gumfooted lines in black widow cobwebs and the mechanical properties of spider capture silk. Zoology 108:41-46.
9. Blackledge TA, Swindeman JE, Hayashi CY. 2005c. Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus. J Exp Biol 208: 1937-1949.
10. Craig CL. 1987. The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders. Biol J Linnean Soc 30:135-162.
11. Craig CL, Riekel C, Herberstein ME, Weber RS, Kaplan D, Pierce NE. 2000. Evidence for diet effects on the composition of silk proteins produced by spiders. Mol Biol Evol 17:1904-1913.
12. Denny M. 1976. The physical properties of spider's silk and their role in the design of orb-webs. J Exp Biol 65:483-506.
13. Garrido MA, Elices M, Viney C, Pérez-Rigueiro J. 2002a. The variability and interdependence of spider dragline tensile properties. Polymer 43:4495-4502.
14. Garrido MA, Elices M, Viney C, Pérez-Rigueiro J. 2002b. Active control of spider silk strength: comparison of dragline spun on vertical and horizontal surfaces. Polymer 43: 1537-1540.
15. Gatesy J, Hayashi C, Motriuk D, Woods J, Lewis R. 2001. Extreme diversity, conservation, and convergence of spider silk fibroin sequences. Science 291:2603-2605.
16. Gosline JM, Demont ME, Denny MW. 1986. The structure and properties of spider silk. Endeavour 10:37-43.
17. Griffiths JR, Salanitri VR. 1980. The strength of spider silk. J Mater Sci 15:491-496.
18. Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. 1998. Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. J Mol Biol 275:773-784.
19. Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. 2001. Spider flagelliform silk: lessons in protein design, gene structure, and molecular evolution. Bioessays 23:750-756.
20. Hayashi CY, Shipley NH, Lewis RV. 1999. Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. Int J Biol Macromol 24:271-275.
21. Hinman MB, Lewis RV. 1992. Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. J Biol Chem 267:19320-19324.
22. Hinman MB, Jones JA, Lewis RV. 2000. Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber. Trends Biotechnol 18:374-379.
23. Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW. 1996. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61-67.
24. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 2002. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Knight DP, Vollrath F. 1999. Liquid crystals and flow elongation in a spider's silk production line. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:519-523.
26. Köhler T, Vollrath F. 1995. Thread biomechanics in the two orb-weaving spiders Araneus diadematus (Araneae, Araneidae) and Uloborus walckenaerius (Araneae, Uloboridae). J Exp Zool 271:1-17.
27. Lewis RV. 1992. Spider silk: the unraveling of a mystery. Acc Chem Res 25:392-398.
28. Madsen B, Shao Z, Vollrath F. 1999. Variability in the mechanical properties of spider silks on three levels: interspecific, intraspecific and intraindividual. IntJ Biol Macromol 24:301-306.
29. Ortlepp CS, Gosline JM. 2004. Consequences of forced silking. Biomacromolecules 5:727-731.
30. Osaki S. 2003. Safety coefficient of the mechanical lifeline of spiders. Polym J 35:261-265.
31. Pan ZJ, Li CP, Xu Q. 2004. Active control on molecular conformations and tensile properties of spider silk. J Appl Polym Sci 92:901-905.
32. Rising A, Nimmervoll H, Grip S, Fernandez-Arias A, Storckenfeldt E, Knight DP, Vollrath F, Engström W. 2005. Spider silk proteins-mechanical property and gene sequence. Zool Sci 22:273-281.
33. Sandoval CP. 1994. Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata: a response to variable prey type. Funct Ecol 8:701-707.
34. Schneider JM, Vollrath F. 1998. The effect of prey type on the geometry of the capture web of Araneus diadematus. Naturwissenschaften 85:391-394.
35. Szlep R. 1965. The web-spinning process and web-structure of Latrodectus tredecimguttatus, L. pallidus and L. revivensis. Proc Zool Soc Lond 145:75-89.
36. Tso I-M, Wu H-C, Hwang I-R. 2005. Giant wood spider Nephila pilipes alters silk protein in response to prey variation. J Exp Biol 208:1053-1061.
37. Tso I-M, Jiang SY, Blackledge TA. 2007. Does the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes respond to prey variation by altering web or silk properties? Ethology 113:324-333.
38. Vollrath F, Köhler T. 1996. Mechanics of silk produced by loaded spiders. Proc Biol Sci 263:387-391.
39. Vollrath F, Madsen B, Shao ZZ. 2001. The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk. ProcR Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2339-2346.
40. Xu M, Lewis RV. 1990. Structure of a protein super-fiber: spider dragline silk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7120-7124.
41. Zevenbergen JM, Schneider NK, Blackledge TA. 2008. Fine dining or fortress? Functional shifts in spider web architecture by the western black widow Latrodectus hesperus. Anim Behav, in press. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.008.