Finite element analysis of the effect of shape memory alloy on the stress distribution and contact pressure in total knee replacement

Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 95-100

  Bahraminasab, Marjan ^a   Sahari, B B ^a   Roshdi Hassan, Mohd ^a   Arumugam, Manohar ^a   Shamsborhan, Mahmoud ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTACT BEHAVIOR; CONTACT PRESSURES; FEMORAL COMPONENT; MATERIAL PROPERTY; NITI SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; RIGID BONES; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY; STATIC LOADING; STRESS SHIELDING; STRESS VALUES; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VON MISES STRESS;

ALLOYS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BONE; JOINT PROSTHESES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 80051876620     PISSN: 09711198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Kurtz S, Ong K et al., Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 2007. 89(4): p. 780-5. (Pubitemid 46564282)
2. M. Bahraminasab, M.R. Hassan et al., Metallic Biomaterials of Knee and Hip-A Review. Trends in biomaterials and ortificial organs, 2010. 24(1): p. 69-82.
3. Geetha M, Singh AK et al., Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants "A review. Progress in Materials Science, 2008. 54(3): p.397-425.
4. Mantovani D, Shape memory alloys: Properties and biomedical applications. JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2000. 52(10): p. 36-44. (Pubitemid 32067189)
5. Otsuka K, Wayman CM. Shape memory materials: Cambridge University Press New York, 1999.
6. Duerig T, Pelton A et al., An overview of nitinol medical applications. Materials Science and Engineering A, 1999. 273(275): p. 149-60.
7. Machado LG, Savi MA, Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2003. 36: p. 683-91. (Pubitemid 36880739)
8. Chu PK, Enhancement of surface properties of biomaterials using plasma-based technologies. Surface &Coatings Technology, 2007. 201(19-20): p. 8076-82. (Pubitemid 47074228)
9. Chu CL, Guo C et al., Microstructure, nickel suppression and mechanical characteristics of electropolished and photoelectrocatalytically oxidized biomedical nickel titanium shape memory alloy. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009. 5(6): p. 2238-45.
10. Firstov GS, Vitchev RG et al., Surface oxidation of NiTi shape memory alloy. Biomaterials, 2002. 23(24): p. 4863-71. (Pubitemid 35286709)
11. Choi J, Bogdanski D et al., Calcium phosphate coating of nickel-titanium shape-memory alloys. Coating procedure and adherence of leukocytes and platelets. Biomaterials, 2003. 24(21): p. 3689-96. (Pubitemid 36773605)
12. Chen MF, Yang XJ et al., Bioactive NiTi shape memory alloy used as bone bonding implants. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2004. 24(4): p. 497-502. (Pubitemid 38616263)
13. Poon RWY, Yeung KWK et al., Carbon plasma immersion ion implantation of nickel-titanium shape memory alloys. Biomaterials, 2005. 26(15): p. 2265-72. (Pubitemid 39600679)
14. Michiardi A, Aparicio C et al., Electrochemical behaviour of oxidized NiTi shape memory alloys for biomedical applications. Surface &Coatings Technology, 2007. 201(14): p. 6484-8.
15. Nag S, Samuel S et al., Characterization of novel borides in Ti"Nb"Zr "Ta+ 2B metal-matrix composites. Materials characterization, 2009. 60(2): p.106-13.
16. Wasielewski R, Galante J et al., Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1994. 299: p. 31.
17. Blunn G, Joshi A et al., Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties* 1:: A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. The Journal of arthroplasty, 1997. 12(3): p. 281-90. (Pubitemid 29021328)
18. Van Loon CJM, De Waal Malefijt MC et al., Femoral bone loss in total knee arthroplasty. A review. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 1999. 65(2): p. 154-63. (Pubitemid 29319075)
19. Godest AC, Beaugonin M et al., Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002. 35(2): p. 267-75. (Pubitemid 34037102)
20. Halloran JP, Petrella AJ et al., Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics. Journal of Biomechanics, 2005. 38(2): p. 323-31. (Pubitemid 39642954)
21. Villa T, Migliavacca F et al., Contact stresses and fatigue life in a knee prosthesis: comparison between in vitro measurements and computational simulations. Journal of Biomechanics, 2004. 37(1): p. 45-53.
22. Chu T, Investigation on contact stresses of New Jersey Low Contact Stress (NJLCS) knee using finite element method. Journal of Systems Integration, 1999. 9(2): p. 187-99.
23. Liau J, Cheng C et al., Effect of Fuji pressure sensitive film on actual contact characteristics of artificial tibiofemoral joint. Clinical Biomechanics, 2002. 17(9-10): p. 698-704. (Pubitemid 35365716)
24. Liau J, Hu C et al., The influence of inserting a Fuji pressure sensitive film between the tibiofemoral joint of knee prosthesis on actual contact characteristics. Clinical Biomechanics, 2001. 16(2): p. 160-6. (Pubitemid 32143683)
25. Petersen MM, Lauritzen JB et al., Decreased bone density of the distal femur after uncemented knee arthroplasty. A 1-year follow-up of 29 knees. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1996. 67(4): p. 339-44. (Pubitemid 26288312)
26. Au AG, James Raso V et al., Contribution of loading conditions and material properties to stress shielding near the tibial component of total knee replacements. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007. 40(6): p. 1410-6. (Pubitemid 46483452)
27. Soininvaara T, Miettinen H et al., Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 69 patients. The Knee, 2004. 11(4): p. 297-302. (Pubitemid 38903240)
28. Van Lenthe G, de Waal Malefijt M et al., Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME-, 1997. 79: p. 117-22.
29. Au AG, Liggins AB et al., A parametric analysis of fixation post shape in tibial knee prostheses. Medical Engineering and Physics, 2005. 27(2): p. 123-34. (Pubitemid 40103510)
30. Askew MJ, Lewis JL, Analysis of model variables and fixation post length effects on stresses around a prosthesis in the proximal tibia. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1981. 103(4): p. 239-45. (Pubitemid 12174212)
31. Miyoshi S, Takahashi T et al., Analysis of the shape of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty using a three dimension finite element model. Clinical Biomechanics, 2002. 17(7): p. 521-5. (Pubitemid 36158791)
32. Bureau MN. Biomimetic polymer composites for orthopedic implants Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Advanced Biomaterials/Biomechanics, 2005: P. 142.
33. Jahan A, Ismail M et al., Material screening and choosing methods "A review. Materials and Design, 2010. 31(2): p.696-705.
34. Ahmed A, Burke D et al., In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints"Part II: Retropatellar surface. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1983. 105: p. 226.
35. Brown T, Shaw D, In vitro contact stress distribution on the femoral condyles. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1984. 2(2): p. 190-9. (Pubitemid 14046736)
36. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H, The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: a study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthopaedica, 1980. 51(1-6): p. 871-9. (Pubitemid 11146058)
37. Haut Donahue TLH, Hull ML et al., A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2002. 124(3): p. 273-80. (Pubitemid 34587355)
38. Shepherd DET, Seedhom BB, The 'instantaneous' compressive modulus of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Rheumatology, 1999. 38(2): p. 124-32. (Pubitemid 29507232)
39. Whipple R. Advances in bioengineering Advances in Bioengineering. New Orleans, LA, USA: ASME, 1984.
40. Tissakht M, Ahmed AM, Tensile stress-strain characteristics of the human meniscal material. Journal of Biomechanics, 1995. 28(4): p. 411-22.
41. Skaggs DL, Warden WH et al., Radial tie fibers influence the tensile properties of the bovine medial meniscus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1994. 12(2): p. 176-85. (Pubitemid 24146881)
42. Fithian D, Kelly M et al., Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1990. (252): p. 19.
43. Aspden RM, A model for the function and failure of the meniscus. Engineering in Medicine, 1985. 14(3): p. 119-22. (Pubitemid 16222045)
44. Sabatini A, Goswami T, Hip implants VII: Finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Materials and Design, 2008. 29(7): p. 1438-46. (Pubitemid 351479881)
45. Wang GZ, Xuan FZ et al., Effects of triaxial stress on martensite transformation, stress-strain and failure behavior in front of crack tips in shape memory alloy NiTi. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2010. 527(6): p. 1529-36.
46. Kleinstreuer C, Li Z et al., Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008. 41(11): p. 2370-8.
47. DeHeer DC, Hillberry BM. The effect of thickness and nonlinear material behavior on contact stresses in polyethylene tibial components Transactions of the 38th Annual Meeting,Orthopaedic Research Society, 1992.
48. Bendjaballah M, Shirazi-Adl A et al., Biomechanics of the human knee joint in compression: reconstruction, mesh generation and finite element analysis. The Knee, 1995. 2(2): p. 69-79.
49. Beillas P, Papaioannou G et al., A new method to investigate in vivo knee behavior using a finite element model of the lower limb. Journal of Biomechanics, 2004. 37(7): p. 1019-30. (Pubitemid 38686326)
50. Haut Donahue TL, Hull ML et al., How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint. Journal of Biomechanics, 2003. 36(1): p. 19-34. (Pubitemid 35448090)
51. Haut Donahue TL, Hull ML et al., The sensitivity of tibiofemoral contact pressure to the size and shape of the lateral and medial menisci. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2004. 22(4): p. 807-14. (Pubitemid 38756261)