Pre-clinical evaluation of ceramic femoral head resurfacing prostheses using computational models and mechanical testing

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 225, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 866-876

  Dickinson, A S ^a,b   Browne, M ^a   Wilson, K C ^b   Jeffers, J R T ^b   Taylor, A C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Finsbury Development Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ceramic hip resurfacing; FE analysis; Mechanical testing; Pre clinical analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS VERIFICATION; CANTILEVER LOADING; CERAMIC FEMORAL HEADS; CERAMIC HIP; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; FATIGUE CYCLES; FE ANALYSIS; FEMORAL HEADS; HIP RESURFACING; IN-VIVO; INTERNATIONAL TEST STANDARD; MECHANICAL TESTS; MECHANICAL VERIFICATION; METAL DEVICES; METAL-ION RELEASE; METALLIC DEVICES; MINIMUM LOAD; NEW DESIGN; NOVEL CERAMICS; PRE-CLINICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SAFETY MARGIN; STATE OF THE ART; THIN-WALLED; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS; VERIFICATION TESTS; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (THR);

BONE; CERAMIC MATERIALS; DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HIP PROSTHESES; LOADING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL TESTING; METAL ANALYSIS; METAL IONS; METAL TESTING; ARTHROPLASTY; METALS; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES;

PROSTHETICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CERAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 80051848907     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911411605     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Hedlundh, U., Ahnfelt, L., Hybbinette, C.-H., Wallinder, L., Weckstrom, J., and Fredin, H. Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1996, 333, 226-233. (Pubitemid 26428033)
2. McMinn, D., Treacy, R., Lyn, K., and Pynsent, P. Metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1996, 329S, S89-S98.
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association. National joint replacement registry annual report, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Adelaide, 2008.
4. McMinn, D. and Daniel, J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220, 239-251.
5. Pandit, H., Glyn-Jones, S., McLardy-Smith, P., Gundle, R., Whitwell, D., Gibbons, C. L. M., Ostlere, S., Athanasou, N., Gill, H. S., and Murray, D. W. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2008, 90-B, 847-851. (Pubitemid 352009768)
6. Campbell, P., Shimmin, A., Walter, L., and Solomon, M. Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J. Arthoplasty, 2008, 23, 1080-1085.
7. Boutin, P. Arthroplastie totale de le hanche par prostheses en aluminine fritte. Rev. Chir. Orthop., 1970, 58, 230-246.
8. Amstutz, H.C., Ebramzadeh, E., Sarkany, A., Le Duff, M., and Rude, R. Preservation of bone mineral density of the proximal femur following hemisurface arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 2004, 27, 1266-1271. (Pubitemid 40044958)
9. Wagner, H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1978, 134, 102-130. (Pubitemid 9047593)
10. Freeman, M. A. R. and Brown, G. C. ICLH cemented double cup replacement. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 1978, 92, 191-198. (Pubitemid 9002983)
11. Furuya, K., Tsuchiya, M., and Kawachi, S. Socket-cup arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1978, 134, 41-44. (Pubitemid 9047586)
12. Salzer, M., Knahr, K., Locke, H., and Stark, N. Cement-free bioceramic double-cup endoprosthesis of the hip-joint. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1978, 134, 80-86. (Pubitemid 9047591)
13. Capello, W. N., Ireland, P. H., Trammell, T. R., and Eicher, P. Conservative total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1978, 134, 59-74.
14. Capello, W. N., Misamore, G. W., and Trancik, T. M. Conservative total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1982, 13, 833-842. (Pubitemid 13212973)
15. Hamadouche, M., Boutin, P., Daussange, J., Bolander, M. E., and Sedel, L. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5 year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2002, 84-A, 69-77.
16. Amstutz, H. C., Le Duff, M. J., Campbell, P. A., and Dorey, F. J. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 conserve plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J. Arthoplasty, 2007, 22, 481-489. (Pubitemid 46880181)
17. Steffen, R.T., Pandit, H. P., Palan, J., Beard, D. J., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., Murray, D. W., and Gill, H. S. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2008, 90-B, 436-441. (Pubitemid 351542858)
18. Isaac, G. H., Brockett, C., Breckon, A., van der Jagt, D., Williams, S., Hardaker, C., Fisher, J., and Schepers, A. Ceramic-on-metal bearings in total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2009, 91-B, 1134-1141.
19. Lusty, P. J., Tai, C. C., Sew-Hoy, R. P., Walter, W. L., Walter, W. K., and Zicat, B. A. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2007, 89, 2676-2683. (Pubitemid 350230622)
20. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of safety and effectiveness data: Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) system, 2005, available from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ cdrh-docs/pdf4/ P040033b.pdf (accessed May 2007).
21. Willmann, G. Improving bearing surfaces of artificial joints. Adv. Engng Mater., 2001, 3, 135-141. (Pubitemid 33405693)
22. Pollard, T. C. B., Baker, R. P., Eastaugh-Waring, S. J., and Bannister, G. C. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2006, 88-B, 592-600.
23. Ong, K. L., Kurtz, S. M., Manley, M. T., Rushton, N., Mohammed, N. A., and Field, R. E. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2006, 88-B, 1110-1115.
24. Dickinson, A. S., Taylor, A. C., and Browne, M. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: The influence of prosthesis size and positioning on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2010, 224, 427-440.
25. Dickinson, A. S., Taylor, A. C., and Browne, M. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 2: The influence of prosthesis stem design on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2010, 224, 841-851.
26. Taylor, M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220, 289-297.
27. Morlock, M. M., Bishop, N., Ruther, W., Delling, G., and Hahn, M. Biomechanical, morphological and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220, 333-344.
28. Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., and Rohlmann, A. Hip joint contact forces during stumbling. Langenbecks Arch. Surg., 2004, 389, 53-59. (Pubitemid 38200272)
29. MatWeb.com. Ensinger Radel® R-5500 polyphenylsulfone data sheet, 2010, available from http:// www.matweb.com/search/datasheettext.aspx?matg uid=00049fb49f214b7aa3bf8672a5593c41 (accessed January 2010).
30. ASTM International. ASTM F2068-09: Standard specification for femoral prostheses - metallic implants, 2009 (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
31. British Standards Institution. BS7251-13:1995 Orthopaedic joint prostheses - Part 13: Method for determination of resistance to torque of head fixation of stemmed femoral components, 1995 (BSI, London).
32. Brockett, C., Williams, S., Jin, Z., Isaac, G., and Fisher, J. Friction of total hip replacements with different bearings and loading conditions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2007, 81B, 508-515. (Pubitemid 46685121)
33. Scholes, S. C., Unsworth, A., and Goldsmith, A. A. J. A frictional study of total hip joint replacements. Phys. Med. Biol., 2000, 45, 3721-3735. (Pubitemid 32005285)
34. Venditolli, P.-A., Roy, A., Mottard, S., Girard, J., Lusignan, D., and Lavigne, M. Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2010, 92-B, 12-19.
35. Dickinson, A. S., Browne, M., Jeffers, J. R. T., and Taylor, A. C. FE analysis of the effect of hip resurfacing stem design on femoral head and neck strains. Trans. ORS, 2008, 33, 1804.
36. Pal, B., Gupta, S., and New, A. M. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur. J. Biomech., 2010, 43, 2908-2914.
37. Keyak, J. H., Rossi, S. A., Jones, K. A., and Skinner, H. B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modelling. J. Biomech., 1998, 31, 125-133. (Pubitemid 28195808)
38. Schileo, E., Taddei, F., Cristolfini, L., and Viceconti, M. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in-vitro. J. Biomech., 2008, 41, 356-367.
39. Duchemin, L., Mitton, D., Jolivet, E., Bousson, V., Laredo, J. D., and Skalli, W. An anatomical subject-specific FE-model for hip fracture load prediction. Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Engng, 2008, 11, 105-111.
40. Gabriel, J.-L. and Trousdale, R. T. Stem fracture after hemiresurfacing for femoral head osteonecrosis. J. Arthoplasty, 2003, 18, 96-99. (Pubitemid 36164411)