Can sex differences in science be tied to the long reach of prenatal hormones? brain organization theory, digit ratio (2D/4D), and sex differences in preferences and cognition

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 134-146

  Valla, Jeffrey M ^a   Ceci, Stephen J ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

2D 4D digit ratio; Cognitive sex differences; Hormones

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051821248     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691611400236     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alexander, G. (2006). Associations among gender-linked toy preferences, spatial ability, and digit ratio: Evidence from eye-tracking analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 699-709.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. London: Penguin.
3. Berenbaum, S., & Resnick, S. (2007). The seeds of career choices: Prenatal sex hormone effects on psychological sex differences. In S.J. Ceci & W.M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 147-158). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S.J. (1994). Nature-nurture in developmental perspective: A bioecological theory. Psychological Review, 101, 568-586.
5. Brookes, H., Neave, N., Hamilton, C., & Fink, B. (2007). Digit ratio (2D/4D) and lateralization for basic numerical quantification. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 55-59.
6. Brosnan, M. (2006). Digit ratio and academia: Implications for the relationship between prenatal testosterone and academia. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 455-466.
7. Brosnan, M. (2008). Digit ratio as an indicator of numeracy relative to literacy in 7-year-old British schoolchildren. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 75-85.
8. Bull, R., & Benson, P. (2006). Digit ratio (2D/4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 194-199.
9. Burrelli, J. (2008). Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions (NSF 08-308). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf08308/
10. Ceci, S.J. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Ceci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (Eds.). (2007). Why aren't there more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Ceci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (2010a). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Ceci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (2010b). Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 275-279.
14. Ceci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (in press). Understanding current causes of women's under representation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
15. Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M., & Barnett, S.M. (2009). Women's under representation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218-261.
16. Coates, J.M., Gurnell, M., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 623-628.
17. Cohen-Bendahan, C.C., van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S.A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353-384.
18. Dickens, W.T., & Flynn, J.R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108, 346-369.
19. Else-Quest, N., Hyde, J.S., & Linn, M.C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103-127.
20. Falter, C.M., Arroyo, M., & Davis, G.J. (2006). Testosterone: Activation or organization of spatial cognition? Biological Psychology, 73, 132-140.
21. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Sex Roles, 30, 81-92.
22. Finegan, J., Niccols, G.A., & Sitarenios, G. (1992). Relations between prenatal testosterone levels and cognitive abilities at 4 years. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1075-1089.
23. Fink, B., Brookes, H., Neave, N., Manning, J.T., & Geary, D.C. (2006). Second to fourth digit ratio and numerical competence in children. Brain and Cognition, 61, 211-218.
24. Gallagher, A.M., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Guo, G., & Stearns, E. (2002). The social influences on the realization of genetic potential for intellectual development. Social Forces, 80, 881-910.
27. Halpern, D.F. (2004). A cognitive taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 135-139.
28. Halpern, D.F., Benbow, C.P., Geary, D., Gur, R., Hyde, J.S., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51.
29. Hönekopp, J., Bartholdt, L., Beier, L., & Liebert, A. (2007). Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D/4D) and adult sex hormone levels: New data and a meta-analytic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 313-321.
30. Hooven, C., Chabris, C., Ellison, P., & Kosslyn, S. (2004). The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation. Neuropsychology, 42, 782-790.
31. Hyde, J.S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
32. Hyde, J.S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M.C., Ellis, A.B., & Williams, C.C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495.
33. Hyde, J.S., & Mertz, J.E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 106, 8801-8807.
34. Jordan-Young, R. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Kempel, P., Gohlke, B., Klempau, J., Zinsberger, P., Reuter, M., & Hennig, J. (2005). Second-to-fourth digit length, testosterone and spatial ability. Intelligence, 33, 215-230.
36. Kondo, T., Zákány, J., Innis, J., & Duboule, D. (1997). Of fingers, toes and penises. Nature, 390, 29-30.
37. Lohman, D., & Lakin, J. (2009). Consistencies in sex differences on the cognitive abilities test across countries, grades, test forms, and cohorts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 389-407.
38. Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., & Raggett, P. (2002). Foetal testosterone and eye contact in 12-month old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 327-335.
39. Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., & Manning, J. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Human Development, 77, 23-28.
40. Manning, J. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41. Manning, J., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D., Trivers, R., Singh, D., et al. (2000). The 2nd and 4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution & Human Behavior, 21, 163-183.
42. Manning, J., & Leinster, S. (2001). 2nd to 4th digit ratio and age at presentation of breast cancer. Breast, 10, 355-357.
43. Mayhew, T.M.L., Gillam, R., McDonald, J., & Ebling, F.J.P. (2007). Human 2D (index) and 4D (ring) digit lengths: Their variation and relationship during the menstrual cycle. Journal of Anatomy, 211, 630-638.
44. Moffat, S., & Hampson, E. (1996). A curvilinear relationship between testosterone cognition in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 323-337.
45. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Fierros, E.G., Goldberg, A.L., & Stemler, S.E. (2000, July). Gender differences in achievement: IEA's third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Lynch School of Education, International Study Center. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss1995i/TIMSSPDF/t95_gender_all.pdf
46. Nelson, D., & Brammer, C. (2010) A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Retrieved from http://chem.ou.edu/*djn/diversity/faculty_Tables_FY07/FinalReport07.html
47. Nosek, B.A., Smyth, F.L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N.M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 106, 10593-10597.
48. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
49. Okten, A., Kalyoncu, M., & Yaris, N. (2002). The ratio of secondand fourth-digit lengths and congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Early Human Development, 70, 47-54.
50. Penner, A.M. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology, 114(Suppl.), S138-S170.
51. Puts, D., McDaniel, M., Jordan, C., & Breedlove, S. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100-111.
52. Romano, M., Leoni, B., & Saino, N. (2006). Examination marks of male university students positively correlate with finger length ratios (2D/4D). Biological Psychology, 7, 175-182.
53. Shalala, D.E., Agogino, A.M., Bailyn, L., Birgeneau, R., Cauce, A.M. Deangeles, C., et al. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
54. Shonkoff, J.P., & Phillips, D. (Eds.). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. Sommers, C.H. (2008, March/April).Why can't a woman be more like a man? The American, 2. Retrieved from www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-bemore-like-a-man
56. Spelke, E.S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science: A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950-958.
57. Strand, S., Deary, I.J., & Smith, P. (2006). Sex differences in Cognitive Abilities Test scores: A UK national picture. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 463-480.
58. Valla, J.M., Ganzel, B.L., Yoder, K.J., Chen, G.M., Lyman, L.T., Sidari, A.P., et al. (2010). More than maths and mindreading: Sex differences in empathising/systemising covariance. Autism Research, 3, 174-184.
59. van Anders, S., & Hampson, E. (2005). Testing the prenatal androgen hypothesis: Measuring digit ratios, sexual orientation, and spatial abilities in adults. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 92-98.
60. Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D/4D) research, 1998-2008. Psychological Reports, 104, 922-956.
61. Vuoksimaa, E., Kaprio, J., Kremen, W.S., Hokkanen, L., Viken, R.J., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., & Rose, R.J. (2010). Having a male cotwin masculinizes mental rotation performance in females. Psychological Science, 21, 1069-1071.
62. Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M.C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30-year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412-423.
63. Wainer, H., & Steinberg, L. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323-326.
64. Weis, S.E., Firker, A., & Hennig, J. (2007). Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 485-493.
65. Wisniewski, A. (1998). Sexually-dimorphic patterns of cortical asymmetry, and the role for sex steroid hormones in determining cortical patterns of lateralization. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 519-547.
66. Witelson, S., & Nowakowski, R. (1991). Left out axons make men right: A hypothesis for the origin of handedness and functional asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 29, 327-333.