The "Why's" of Class Size: Student Behavior in Small Classes

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 321-368

  Finn, Jeremy D ^a   Pannozzo, Gina M ^b   Achilles, Charles M ^c  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c Seton Hall University   (United States)

Author keywords

Class behavior; Class size; Engagement; Small classes; Student behavior; Teacher student interactions

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141907302     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543073003321     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Achilles, C. M. (1999). Let's put kids first, finally: Getting class size right. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2. Achilles, C. M., & Finn, J. D. (2002). The varieties of small classes and their outcomes. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 121-146). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
3. Achilles, C. M., Kiser-Kling, K., Aust, A., & Owen, J. (1995, April). A study of reduced class size in primary grades of a fully Chapter 1-eligible school: Success Starts Small. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
4. Achilles, C. M., Nye, B. A., & Zaharias, J. B. (1995, April). Policy use of research results: Tennessee 's Project Challenge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
5. Adams, R. S., & Biddle, B. J. (1970). Realities of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. D. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
7. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Bateman, H. V. (2002). Students' sense of community: Implications for class size. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 63-75). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
9. Bateman, H. V., Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., & Newbrough, J. R. (2000, April). Sense of community in the classroom: Relationship to students' academic goals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
10. Bateman, H. V., Goldman, S. R., Newbrough, J. R., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Students' sense of community in constructivist/collaborative learning environments. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 126-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. ( 1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
12. Blatchford, P. (in press). A systematic observational study of teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes. Learning and Instruction.
13. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
14. Bohrnstedt, G. W., Stecher, B. M., & Wiley, E. W. (2000). The California class size reduction evaluation: Lessons learned. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 201-225). Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
15. Bourke, S. (1986). How smaller is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 558-571.
16. Boyd-Zaharias, J., & Pate-Bain, H. (2000). Early and new findings from Tennessee's Project STAR. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 65-97). Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
17. Bray, R. M., Kerr, N. L., & Atkin, R. S. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.
18. Bryk, A. S., & Thum, Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on dropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 353-383.
19. Cahen, L. S., Filby, N., McCutcheon, G., & Kyle, D. W. (1983). Class size and instruction. New York: Longman.
20. Caldas, S. J. (1993). Reexamination of input and process factor effects on public school achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 206-214.
21. Chase, C. I., Mueller, D. J., & Walden, J. D. (1986). PRIME TIME: Its impact on instruction and achievement. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Education.
22. CSR Research Consortium. (2000). Class size reduction in California: The 1998-99 evaluation findings. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
23. Dennis, B. D. (1986). Effects of small class size (1:15) on the teacher/learning process in grade two. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tennessee State University, Nashville.
24. Egelson, P., & Harman, P. (2000). Ten years of small class size in Burke County, North Carolina. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 279-297). Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
25. Everston, C. M., & Folger, J. K. (1989, March). Small classes, large classes: What do teachers do differently? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
26. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-109.
27. Finn, J. D., Folger, J., & Cox, D. (1991). Measuring participation among elementary grade students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 393-402.
28. Finn, J. D., Forden, M. A., Verdinelli, S., & Pannozzo, G. M. (2001). Evaluation of the class size reduction initiative - Buffalo Public Schools. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, Graduate School of Education.
29. Finn, J. D., Fulton, D., Zaharias, J., & Nye, B. A. (1989). Carry-over effects of small classes. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 75-84.
30. Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103, 45-83.
31. Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentivewithdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95, 421-434.
32. Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. M. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221-234.
33. Finn, J. D., & Wang, M. C. (Eds.). (2002). Taking small classes one step further. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34. Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
35. French, J. R. P., Jr. (1941). The disruption and cohesion of groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 361-377.
36. French, R. L., & Galloway, C. M. (n.d.). Communication events: A new look at classroom interactions. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
37. Gibb, J. R. (1951). The effects of group size and of threat reduction upon certainty in a problem-solving situation. American Psychologist, 6, 324.
38. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1978). Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class size and achievement. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
39. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
40. Hanushek, E. A. (1998). The evidence on class size. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
41. Hardy, C., & Latane, B. (1986). Social loafing on a cheering task. Social Science, 71, 165-172.
42. Harkins, S. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-18.
43. Harkins, S., & Jackson, J. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
44. Haskins, R., Walden, T., & Ramey, C. T. (1983). Teacher and student behavior in high-and low-ability groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 865-876.
45. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A metaanalysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
46. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
47. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48. Johnston, J. M. (1990). What are teachers' perceptions of teaching in different classroom contexts? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320867).
49. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
50. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1995). Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 134-140.
51. Kashti, Y., Arieli, M., & Harel, Y. (1984). Classroom seating as a definition of situation: Observations in an elementary school in one development town. Urban Education, 19, 161-181.
52. Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224-231.
53. Kiser-Kling, K. A. (1995). A comparative study of life in first grade classrooms of 1:14 and 1:23 teacher/pupil ratios. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
54. Krieger, J. D. (2001). Nature of teacher/student interactions in public elementary schools: Does class size make a difference? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.
55. Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532.
56. Lamborn, S. D., Brown, B. B., Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1992). Putting school in perspective: The influence of family, peers, extracurricular participation, and part-time work on academic engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 153-181). New York: Teachers College Press.
57. Latane, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 39, 308-324.
58. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 823-832.
59. Lewit, E. M., & Baker, L. S. (1997). Class size. Future of Children, 7(3), 112-121.
60. Maier, P., Molnar, A., Percy, S., Smith, P., & Zahorik, J. (1997). First year results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education program. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, Center for Urban Initiatives and Research.
61. Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.
62. McDermott, P. A., & Beitman, B. S. (1984). Standardization of a scale for the study of children's learning styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 5-14.
63. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
64. Miles, K. H. (1995). Freeing resources for improving schools: A case study of teacher allocation in Boston Public Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 476-493.
65. Molnar, A., Smith, P., & Zahorik, J. (1999). 1998-99 evaluation results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, School of Education.
66. Molnar, A., Smith, P., & Zahorik, J. (2000). 1999-2000 evaluation results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, School of Education.
67. Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. Future of Children, 5, 113-127.
68. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-237.
69. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1984). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis. Portland, OR: Author.
70. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
71. Peterson, P. L., Swing, S. R., Stark, K. D., & Waas, G. A. (1984). Students, cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 487-515.
72. Petty, R., Harkins, S., Williams, K., & Latane, B. (1977). The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 579-582.
73. 2 in the classroom environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eastern Michigan University.
74. Ringelmann, M. (1913). Recherches sur les moteurs animes: Travail de l'homme. Annales de l'institut National Agronomique, 12, 1-40.
75. Robinson, G. E. (1990). Synthesis of research on effects of class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80-90.
76. Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1996). Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 395-416.
77. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774-786.
78. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79. Shapson, S. M., Wright, E. N., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 141-152.
80. Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
81. Smith, L., Ross, S., Alberg, M., & Lowther, D. (1999). School observation measure: Observer's manual. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
82. Spivak, G., & Cianci, N. (1987). High-risk early behavior pattern and later delinquency. In J. D. Burchard & S. N. Burchard (Eds.), Prevention of delinquent behavior (pp. 44-74). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83. Stasz, C., & Stecher, B. (2002). Before and after class-size reduction: A tale of two teachers. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 19-50). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
84. Swift, M. S., & Spivak, G. (1968). The assessment of achievement-related classroom behavior. Journal of Special Education, 2, 137-149.
85. Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1993). The effect of experimenter evaluation on self-evaluation within the social loafing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 268-286.
86. Veldman, D. J., & Worsham, M. (1983). Types of student classroom behavior. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 204-209.
87. Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Class size and classroom participation. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Class Size Research, London, England.
88. Wang, M. C., & Stull, J. C. (2000). School characteristics and classroom practice: Smaller versus larger classes. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 175-198). Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
89. Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Leski, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia: Palmer Press.
90. Wolff, K. H. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
91. Word, E., Johnston, J., Bain, H., Fulton, D. B., Boyd-Zaharias, J., Lintz, M. N., et al. (1990). Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee's K-3 class size study. Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education.
92. Wright, E. N., Shapson, S. M., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1977). Effects of class size in the junior grades: A study. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.