Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 2158-2163

  Sanders, James O ^a   Polly Jr , David W ^b   Cats Baril, William ^c,d   Jones, JoAnn ^e   Lenke, Larry G ^f   O'Brien, Michael F ⁱ   Richards, B Stephens ^g,h   Sucato, Daniel J ^g,h  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^d Data Harbor   (United States)

^e Medtronic Sofamor Danek   (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Intermedics Orthopedics Inc   (United States)

^h TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

ⁱ NONE

Author keywords

Appearance; Cosmesis; Outcomes instrument; Scoliosis; Visible deformity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BRACE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENT; PATIENT; PELVIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RIB; ROTATION; SCAPULA; SCOLIOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER GIRDLE; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT INDICATION; WALTER REED VISUAL ASSESSMENT SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; HIP; HUMANS; PARENTS; PATIENTS; POSTURE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RIBS; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHOULDER; SPINE;

EID: 0141590493     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA, et al. Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine. 1986;11:784-789.
2. Edgar MA, Mehta MH. Long-term follow-up of fused and unfused idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:712-716.
3. Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL, et al. Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:222-226.
4. Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, et al. Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:909-912.
5. Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, et al. Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine. 2001;26(4):E55-E63.
6. Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, et al. Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine. 2002;27:1543-1552.
7. Weisz I, Jefferson RJ, Carr AJ, et al. Back shape in brace treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 1989;157-163.
8. Vandegriend B, Hill D, Raso J, et al. Application of computer graphics for assessment of spinal deformities. Med Biol Engl Comput. 1995;33:163-166.
9. Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine. 2002;25:2381-2386.
10. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine. 2002;25:1795-1802.
11. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine. 1999;24:1435-1440.
12. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999;24:1693-1707.
13. Koch KD, Buchanan R, Birch JG, et al. Adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: how physical and psychological characteristics relate to patient satisfaction with the cosmetic result. Spine. 2001;26(19):2119-2124.
14. Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, et al. Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:712-717.
15. Miller DW, Polly DW, McHale KA. (unpublished data).
16. Haher TR, Merola A, Zipnick RI, et al. Meta-analysis of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A 35-year English literature review of 11,000 patients. Spine. 1995;20:1575-1584.
17. Climent JM, Reig A, Sanchez J, et al. Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine. 1995;20:2006-2011.
18. Climent JM, Sanchez J. Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of Adolescents with Spine Deformities. Spine. 1999;24:1903-1908.
19. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J. 2002;10:278-288.
20. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, et al. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27(4):E87-E91;2002;27:E87-91.
21. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, et al. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27(4):E87-E91;2002;27:E87-91.
22. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine. 2002;27(2):176-180.
23. Bridwell KH, Shufflebarger HL, Lenke LG, et al. Parents' and patients' preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine. 2002;25:2392-2399.