Reliability and validity of adapted french canadian version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 623-628

  Beauséjour, Marie ^a,b   Joncas, Julie ^a   Goulet, Lise ^b   Roy Beaudry, Marjolaine ^a   Parent, Stefan ^a,b   Grimard, Guy ^a,b   Forcier, Martin ^a   Lauriault, Sophie ^a   Labelle, Hubert ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cross cultural adaptation; Health related quality of life; Scoliosis; SRS Outcomes Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL BIAS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FRANCE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; BODY IMAGE; CHILD; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUEBEC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65549167798     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181973e58     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24: 1435-40.
2. Hyland ME. A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:24.
3. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25: 2381-6.
4. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scolio-sis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
5. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
6. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74 -7.
7. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton DC. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:473-8.
8. Glattes RC, Burton DC, Lai SM, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity. Spine 2007;32:1778-84.
9. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164 -9; discussion 2169.
10. Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine 2007;32:2220-5.
11. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Os-westry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455- 61.
12. Monticone M, Carabalona R, Negrini S. Reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (Italian version) in mild adolescent vertebral deformities. Eura Medicophys 2004;40:191-7.
13. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:705-9.
14. Alanay A, Akin C, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-8.
15. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idio-pathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population. Spine 2005;30: 1197-201.
16. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idio-pathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1202-5.
17. Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, Alanay A, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2007;32:1141-5.
18. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1986.
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186 -91.
20. Kane WJ. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;126:43-6.
21. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 1997;19:179-86.
22. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, PennA, etal. Replicability ofSF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke 1999;30:1213-7.
23. Feise RJ, Donaldson S, Crowther ER, et al. Construction and validation of the scoliosis quality of life index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1310-5.
24. Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kukl TR, et al. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2719 -22.
25. Mehlman CT, Wall EJ, Foad SL. Patients who've been told they have scoli-osis score the same on the SRS-22 as scoliosis patients requiring treatment. Euro Spine J 2005;14(suppl 1):S6-7.