Contemporary use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Norwegian prospective, multicenter study

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1144-1151

  Glomsaker, Tom ^a,b   Søreide, Kjetil ^a,b   Hoff, Geir ^d,e,f   Aabakken, Lars ^c,d   Søreide, Jon Arne ^a,b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e TELEMARK HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^f CANCER REGISTRY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Demographics; ERCP; Indications; Multicenter; Procedures; Prospective; Registry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DISEASE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILE LEAKAGE; CANNULATION; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DEVICE REMOVAL; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NORWAY; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PANCREATITIS; POST ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPHINCTEROTOMY; STENT; TOOL USE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; CHOLESTASIS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051778055     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: 15027708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.594085     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Al-Hashem H, Muralidharan V, Cohen H, Jamidar PA. Biliary disease in pregnancy with an emphasis on the role of ERCP. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:58-62.
2. Ali M, Ward G, Staley D, Duerksen DR. A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of ERCP in octogenarians. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:586-90.
3. Carr-Locke DL. Overview of the role of ERCP in the management of diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl):S157-60. (Pubitemid 36236835)
4. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, Fleischer D, Hecht GA, Loehrer PJ Sr, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56: 803-9. (Pubitemid 36236707)
5. Darge K, Anupindi S. Pancreatitis and the role of US, MRCP and ERCP. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39(Suppl 2):S153-7.
6. Jafri SM, Monkemuller K, Lukens FJ. Endoscopy in the elderly: a review of the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010;44: 161-6.
7. Paris C, Bejjani J, Beaunoyer M, Ouimet A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:938-42.
8. Ross AS. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the surgically modified gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2009;19:497-507.
9. Tang SJ, Mayo MJ, Rodriguez-Frias E, Armstrong L, Tang L, Sreenarasimhaiah J, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69(3 Pt 1):453-61.
10. Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, Egan J, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:1-8. (Pubitemid 40931917)
11. Bourke MJ, Costamagna G, Freeman ML. Biliary cannula-tion during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogra-phy: core technique and recent innovations. Endoscopy 2009;41:612-17.
12. Bretthauer M, Seip B, Aasen S, Kordal M, Hoff G, Aabakken L. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007;39:58-64. (Pubitemid 46403128)
13. Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1211-19.
14. Kethu SR, Adler DG, Conway JD, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, et al. ERCP cannulation and sphincterotomy devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:435-45.
15. Lopes TL, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2010;39:99-107.
16. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1781-8. (Pubitemid 47206695)
17. Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F, Kerstan E, Vogel W, Schreiber F. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. Endoscopy 2008;40:625-30.
18. Vitte RL, Morfoisse JJ. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures performed in general hospitals in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007; 31(8-9 Pt 1):740-9.
19. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821-9. (Pubitemid 46854199)
20. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417-23.
21. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425-34. (Pubitemid 33661145)
22. www.kreftregisteret.no/en/Research/Projects/Gastronet/. Oslo 2010 (updated 10 Aug 2010).
23. Glomsaker T, Søreide K, Aabakken L, Søreide JA. A national audit of temporal trends in endoscopic retrograde cholan-giopancreatography in Norway. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46:116-21.
24. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10. (Pubitemid 28337421)
25. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18. (Pubitemid 26314443)
26. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:80-8.
27. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. 25 years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: assessment of the experience in 3498 patients. Endoscopy 1998;30:A194-201.
28. Halttunen J, Keranen I, Udd M, Kylanpaa L. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc 2009;23:745-9.
29. Goff JS. Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: trans-pancreatic sphincter approach. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41: 502-5.
30. Demling L. Papillotomy: indications and technique. Endos-copy 1983;15(Suppl 1):162-4.
31. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Deviere J, Mariani A, Rigaux J, Baron TH, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guidelines: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2010;42:503-15.
32. Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A, Lachter J, Chermech I, Karban A, et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepatogastroenter-ology 2005;52:352-5. (Pubitemid 40469423)
33. Springer J, Enns R, Romagnuolo J, Ponich T, Barkun AN, Armstrong D. Canadian credentialing guidelines for endo-scopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastro-enterol 2008;22:547-51.
34. Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101: 892-7.