Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1211-1219

  Cheung, Justin ^a,b,c   Tsoi, Kelvin K ^d   Quan, Wai Leong ^e   Lau, James Y W ^d   Sung, Joseph J Y ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c ROYAL COLUMBIAN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^e TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; CANNULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 70949101704     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.007     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Cotton P.B., Lehman G., Vennes J., et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 383-393
2. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 909-918
3. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 793-801
4. Andriulli A., Loperfido S., Napolitano G., et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 1781-1788
5. Bai Y., Gao J., Shi X., et al. Prophylactic corticosteroids do not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pancreatology 8 (2008) 504-509
6. Elmunzer B.J., Waljee A.K., Elta G.H., et al. A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 57 (2008) 1262-1267
7. Andriulli A., Leandro G., Federici T., et al. Prophylactic administration of somatostatin or gabexate does not prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: an updated meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 624-632
8. Singh P., Das A., Isenberg G., et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 60 (2004) 544-550
9. Freeman M.L. Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5 (2007) 1354-1365
10. Freeman M.L., and Guda N.M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 112-125
11. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134 (2001) 663-694
12. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 17 (1996) 1-12
13. Schulz K.F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA 274 (1995) 1456-1458
14. Park D.H., Lee S.S., Seo D.W., et al. Is the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis not reduced by guide-wire cannulation?. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 784 author reply, 5
15. Bailey A.A. Is the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis not reduced by guide-wire cannulation?. [author reply]. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 785
16. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 652-656
17. Bashir R.M. Selective, wire guided cannulation of the common bile duct reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis by initially accessing the bile duct with a soft-tipped guidewire, without contrast injection. [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 101 Suppl S (2006) S129-S130
18. Michopoulos S., Nastios A., Manthos G., et al. First intention of the biliary tree cannulation by means of a sphincterotome and a hydrophilic guide wire is a low risk-high success rate ERCP method. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 57 (2003) AB201
19. Lella F., Bagnool F., Colombo E., et al. Guide-wire cannulation of Vater's papilla for detecting the main biliary duct during ERCP: a valid and effective method to avoid post-procedural pancreatitis. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) AB71
20. De Tejada A.H., Calleja J.L., Diaz G., et al. Double guide wire technique compared to conventional method in selected cases of difficult common bile duct cannulation in ERCP. Preliminary data from a controlled randomized study. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) AB231
21. Imaizumi H., Kida M., Kikuchi H., et al. Techniques for cannulation of the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) AB299
22. Karamanolis G., Katsikani A., Viazis N., et al. A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 11 (2005) 1649-1652
23. Park D.H., Lee T.H., Park J.-Y., et al. Can wire-guided cannulation (WGC) prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) AB328
24. Bailey A.A., Lynch P.M., Lee E.Y., et al. Results of a randomised trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post ERCP pancreatitis. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) AB284
25. Artifon E.L., Sakai P., Hondo F.Y., et al. Comparison of deep bile duct cannulation with cannulatome versus cannulatome with guide wire: a prospective randomized trial. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) AB198
26. Lynch P.M., Bailey A.A., Lee E.Y., et al. Preliminary results of a randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post ERCP pancreatitis. [abstract]. Gut 55 (2006) A6
27. Bailey A.A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. Guidewire cannulation improves primary success rates but does not protect against post ERCP pancreatitis: final results of a prospective randomised trial. [abstract]. Endoscopy 38 Suppl II (2006) A24
28. Lella F., Bagnolo F., Colombo E., et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 59 (2004) 830-834
29. Artifon E.L., Sakai P., Cunha J.E., et al. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 2147-2153
30. Gruchy S., Macintosh D.G., Michele F., et al. Is the incidence of post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis reduced in patients undergoing hydrophilic guide wire cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) versus standard cannulation with dye injection: a randomized controlled trial [supplement 2]. Gastroenterology 132 (2007) A643
31. Mangiavillano B., Mariani A., Giussani A., et al. Guidewire assisted cannulation of the papilla of Vater to reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomised study. [abstract]. Endoscopy 39 Suppl I (2007) A373
32. Lee T.H., Park D.H., Park J.Y., et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009) 444-449
33. Katsinelos P., Paroutoglou G., Kountouras J., et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 302-307
34. Bailey A.A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 296-301
35. Mavrogiannis C., Liatsos C., Romanos A., et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999) 334-339
36. Somogyi L., Chuttani R., Croffie J., et al. Guidewires for use in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 571-576
37. Adler D.G., Baron T.H., Davila R.E., et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 1-8