A national audit of temporal trends in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Norway

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 116-121

  Glomsaker, Tom ^a   Søreide, Kjetil ^a,b   Aabakken, Lars ^c,d   Søreide, Jon Arne ^a,b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Education; ERCP; Organization; Volume

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; META ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORWAY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; SURGICAL WARD; TREND STUDY;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CLINICAL AUDIT; HUMANS; NORWAY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78651367981     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: 15027708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.513063     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968;167:752-6.
2. Classen M, Demling L. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974;99:496-7.
3. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, Tada M, Koli Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974;20:148-51.
4. Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bassler B, Adamek HE, Layer G, Riemann JF. ERCP and MRCP in the differentiation of pancreatic tumors. Dig Dis 2004;22:18-25.
5. Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Dusak A, Erdem Z, Karademir B, Aydemir S, et al. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature. J Dig Dis 2008;9:162-9.
6. Parnaby CN, Jenkins JT, Ferguson JC, Williamson BW. Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1165-72.
7. Rösch T, Meining A, Frühmorgen S, Zillinger C, Schusdziarra V, Hellerhoff K, et al. A prospective comparison ofthe diagnostic accuracy ofERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:870-6.
8. Mazen JamalM, Yoon EJ, Saadi A, Sy TY, Hashemzadeh M. Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:966-75.
9. Tennoe B, Stiris MG, Dullerud R, Lunde OC, Aadland E. Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts [In Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1999;119:3252-6.
10. Mala T, Lunde OC, Nesbakken A, Aadland E, Stiris M. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-a 4-year retrospective study [In Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2000;120:560-2
11. Population statistics of Norway, 2010. Available at: http://www.ssb.no/ emner/02/[Cited May 2010]
12. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18.
13. Aronson N, Flamm CR, Bohn RL, Mark DH, Speroff T. Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl):S294-302.
14. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:721-31.
15. Kay CL. Which test to replace diagnostic ERCP-MRCP or EUS? Endoscopy 2003;35:426-8.
16. Zhong L, Xiao SD, Stoker J, Nj Tytgat G. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Chin J Dig Dis 2004;5: 139-48.
17. Bret PM, Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1997;29:472-86.
18. Aabakken L, Aagenaes I, Sanengen T, Aasen S, Emblem R, Bjørnland K. Utility of ERCP in neonatal and infant cholestasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:431-6.
19. Aabakken L, Bretthauer M, Line PD. Double-balloon enteroscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Endoscopy 2007;39: 1068-71.
20. Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith HJ, Aasen S, Boberg KM, Schrumpf E. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4: 514-20.
21. Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F, Kerstan E, Vogel W, Schreiber F. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic ret-rograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. Endoscopy 2008;40: 625-30.
22. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821-9.
23. Andriulli A, Loperfido S. Efficacy Versus effectiveness of octreotide in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1539 (Pubitemid 46976308)
24. Gall Stone Registry of Sweden, 2008. Available at: www.ucr. uu.se/gallriks/.
25. Jones WB, Roettger RH, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in general surgery: how much are we outsourcing? Am Surg 2009;75: 1050-3.