Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 547-551

  Springer, Jonathon ^a   Enns, Robert ^b   Romagnuolo, Joseph ^c   Ponich, Terry ^d   Barkun, Alan N ^e   Armstrong, David ^f  

^a ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTITIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; GUIDED IMAGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PANCREATITIS; PEDIATRICS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STENT; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VATER PAPILLOTOMY;

EID: 49449104993     PISSN: 08357900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2008/582787     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armstrong D, Enns R, Ponich T, Romagnuolo J, Springer J, Barkun AN. Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic privileges: An overview. Can J Gastroenterol 2007;21:797-801.
2. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547-57.
3. Tse F, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. The elective evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:437-48.
4. Menon K, Barkun AN, Romagnuolo J, et al. Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2646-50.
5. Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, et al; American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Outcomes Research Committee. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:165-9.
6. Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63(4 Suppl):S29-34.
7. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for training in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Surg Endosc 2007;21:1010-1.
8. Cockeram A. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Practice Guideline for clinical competence in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol 1997;11:535-8.
9. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:780-3.
10. Conjoint committee for the recognition of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterological Society of Australia. Information for Registrants. (Version current at May 5, 2008).
11. Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, Affronti J, Browning CL, Bute BP. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:983-9.
12. Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Baron TH, Adler DG. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: A single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:394-400.
13. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al; BSG Audit of ERCP. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective study of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821-9.
14. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, et al. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:628-36.
15. Baillie J, Testoni PA. Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP? Gut 2007;56:744-6. (Erratum in 2007;56:1644).
16. Cotton PB. Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl):S283-90.
17. Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Barkun A, Ginsberg GG, Amman S, Cohen J, Ponsky J, Rex DK, Schembre D, Wilcox CM. Excellence in endoscopy: towards practical metrics. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:286-91.
18. Cass OW. Endoscopic ability and disability. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:401-2.
19. Schlup MM, Williams SM, Barbezat GO. ERCP: A review of technical competency and workload in a small unit. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:48-52.
20. Jowell PS. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Toward a better understanding of competence. Endoscopy 1999;31:755-7.
21. Chutkan RK, Ahmad AS, Cohen J, et al; ERCP Core Curriculum prepared by the ASGE Training Committee. ERCP core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:361-76.
22. Vitale GC, Zavaleta CM, Vitale DS, Binford JC, Tran TC, Larson GM. Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2006;20:149-52.
23. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for individuals in training. General Recommendations on Training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. (Version current at May 22, 2008)
24. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425-34.
25. García-Cano J. 200 supervised procedures: The minimum threshold number for competency in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1254-5.
26. Carr-Locke DL. Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl):S170-4.
27. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl):S273-82.
28. Freeman ML. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Patient and technique-related risk factors. JOP 2002;3:169-76.
29. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003;13:775-98, xi.
30. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18.
31. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al; Standards of Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:633-8.
32. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:845-64.
33. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: A review. Endoscopy 1997;29:288-97.
34. Nelson DB, Freeman ML. Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: Risk factor analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994;19:283-7.
35. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel EL, et al. Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:757-64.
36. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:7-17.
37. Sivak MV Jr. "Trained in ERCP". Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:412-4.
38. Baillie J. ERCP training: For the few, not for all. Gut 1999;45:9-10.
39. Baillie J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006;16:529-42, viii.
40. Bar-Meir S. Simbionix simulator. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006;16:471-8, vii.
41. Sedlack R, Petersen B, Binmoeller K, Kolars J. A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:886-90.
42. Matthes K, Cohen J. The Neo-Papilla: A new modification of porcine ex vivo simulators for ERCP training (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:570-6.
43. Jenkins JT, Glass G, Ballantyne S, Fullarton GM. Effect of MRCP introduction on ERCP practice: Are there implications for service and training? Gut 2006;55:1365-6.
44. Sahel J, Barthet M, Gasmi M. The substitution of endoscopic ultrasonography for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: Implications for service development and training. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16:291-4.
45. Meenan J, Tibble J, Prasad P, Wilkinson M. The substitution of endoscopic ultrasound for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: Implications for service development and training. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16:299-303.
46. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425-34.
47. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
48. Freeman ML. Procedure-specific outcomes assessment for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1999;9:639-47, vii.
49. Cotton PB. How many times have you done this procedure, doctor? Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:522-3.