Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1781-1788

  Andriulli, Angelo ^a   Loperfido, Silvano ^b   Napolitano, Grazia ^a   Niro, Grazia ^a   Valvano, Maria Rosa ^a   Spirito, Fulvio ^a   Pilotto, Alberto ^a   Forlano, Rosario ^a  

^a CASA SOLLIEVO DELLA SOFFERENZA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; DATA BASE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FATALITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFECTION; MORTALITY; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34250860050     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Freeman ML. Toward improving outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 48 : 96 102.
2. Gottlieb K, Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Amer 1998 8 : 87 114 NIH State-of the science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. Available at : http://consensus.nih.gov. Accessed September 2006.
3. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 57 : 633 8.
4. Sherman S, Lehman GL. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991 6 : 350 67.
5. Gottlieb S, Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Gastroint Endosc Clin N Am 1998 8 : 87 114.
6. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991 37 : 383 93.
7. Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results form a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 2002 34 : 991 7.
8. Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA, et al. Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: Factors influencing the complication rate. Endoscopy 1994 26 : 209 16.
9. Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro MJ, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy- induced pancreatitis: Increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 1994 89 : 327 33.
10. Choudari CP, Sherman S, Fogel EL, et al. Success of ERCP at a referral center after a previously unsuccessful attempt. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 52 : 478 83.
11. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, et al. Complications of ERCP: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 60 : 721 31.
12. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: Patient-related and operative risk factors. Endoscopy 2002 34 : 286 92.
13. Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF, et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related? Gut 1997 41 : 545 8.
14. Dickinson RJ, Davies S. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: The role of operative and patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998 10 : 423 8.
15. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996 335 : 909 18.
16. Köklü S, Parlak E, Yüksel O, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: A prospective and comparative study. Age Ageing 2005 34 : 572 7.
17. Lal D, Lane M, Wong P. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. N Z Med J 2003 116 : U496.
18. Leese T, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg 1985 7 : 215 9.
19. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 48 : 1 10.
20. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 : 417 23.
21. Ong TZ, Khor JL, Selamat DS, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post_MRCP era: A tertiary center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2005 11 : 5209 12.
22. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Bulling D, et al. Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: Preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment. Endoscopy 2000 32 : 10 9.
23. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991 101 : 1068 75.
24. Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A, et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: A prospective single center study. 2005 52 : 352 5.
25. Tanner AR. ERCP: Present practice in a single region. Suggested standards for monitoring performance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996 8 : 145 8.
26. Tzovaras G, Shukla P, Kow L, et al. What are the risks of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Aust N Z J Surg 2000 70 : 778 82.
27. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCT, et al. Risks factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 : 652 6.
28. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: A survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 53 : 620 7.
29. McMahon AJ, Fischbacher CM, Frame SH, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A population-based study. Lancet 2000 356 : 1632 37.
30. Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, et al. A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 : 334 40.
31. Trap R, Adamsen S, Hart-Hansen Q, et al. Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals. Endoscopy 1999 31 : 125 30.
32. Cotton PB. Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 63 : 378 82.
33. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 59 : 845 63.
34. Andriulli A, Caruso N, Quitadamo M, et al. Antisecretory vs. antiproteasic drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: The evidence-based medicine derived from a meta-analysis study. JOP 2003 4 : 41 8.
35. Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 60 : 544 50.
36. Deviere J, Le Moine O, Van Laethem JL, et al. Interleukin 10 reduces the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2001 120 : 498 505.
37. Prat F, Amaris J, Ducot B, et al. Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective, double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 : 202 8.
38. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Chatzis J, et al. High-dose allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 : 407 15.
39. Sudhindran S, Bromwich E, Edwards PR. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2001 88 : 1178 82.