Neoliberalism is dead, long live neoliberalism? neostructuralism and the international aid regime of the 2000s

Progress in Development Studies

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 307-319

  Murray, Warwick E ^a   Overton, John D ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Development theory; Heterodox paradox; International aid; Neoliberalism; Neostructuralism

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT THEORY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; INTERNATIONAL AID; NEOLIBERALISM; PARADIGM SHIFT; POVERTY;

LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 80051756516     PISSN: 14649934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146499341001100403     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Action Aid. 2008: Making aid accountable and effective. Action Aid, Johannesburg.
2. Barton, J.R. and Murray, W.E. 2002: The end of transition? Chile 1990-2000. Bulletin of Latin American Research 21, 329-38.
3. Brohman, J. 1996: Popular development: Rethinking the theory and practice of development. Blackwell Publishers.
4. Buchanan, P. 2008: Prospects and problems of indigenous socialism in Latin America. In Murray, W.E. and Rabel, R., editors, Latin America today: Challenges, opportunities and trans-Pacific perspectives. New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, 57-70.
5. Buiter, W.H. 2007: Country ownership: A term whose time has gone. Development in Practice 17, 647-52.
6. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001: The case for participation: The new tyranny? In Cooke, B. and Kothari, U., editors, Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books, 1-23.
7. Cornwall, A. 2007: Buzzwords and fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice 17, 471-84.
8. Craig, D. and Porter, D. 2003: Poverty reduction strategy papers: A new convergence. World Development 31, 53-69.
9. Craig, D. and Porter, D. 2006: Development beyond neoliberalism? Governance, poverty reduction and political economy. Routledge.
10. Cramer, C., Stein, H. and Weeks, J. 2006: Ownership and donorship: Analytical issues and a Tanzanian case study. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 24, 415-36.
11. de Haan, A. 2009: How the aid industry works: An introduction to international development. Kumarian Press.
12. ECLAC. 1990: Changing production patterns with social equity. Santiago, ECLAC.
13. Eurodad. 2008: Outcome-based conditionality: Too good to be true? Brussels, European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad).
14. Eyben, R. 2007: Harmonisation: How is the orchestra conducted? Development in Practice 17, 640-46.
15. Fine, B. 1997: The developmental state is dead: Long live social capital? Development and Change 30, 1-19.
16. Gould, J. 2005: The new conditionality: The politics of poverty reduction strategies. Zed Books.
17. Gwynne, R.N. and Kay, C. 2000: Views from the periphery: Futures of neoliberalism in Latin America. Third World Quarterly 21, 141-56.
18. Gwynne, R.N. and Kay, C.2004: Latin America transformed: Globalization and modernity. Arnold Publication.
19. Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. 2004: Towards participation as transformation: Critical themes and challenges. In Hickey, S. and Mohan, G., editors, Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Zed Books, 3-24.
20. Hojman, D. 1997: El Mercurio's editorial page ('La Semana Economica') and neoliberal policy making in today's Chile. In Fowler, W., editor, Ideologues and ideologies in Latin America. Greenwood, 171-85.
21. Howell, J. and Lind, J. 2008: Changing donor policy and practice in civil society in the post-9/11 aid context. Third World Quarterly 30, 1279-96.
22. Hyden, G. 2008: After the Paris Declaration: Taking on the issue of power. Development Policy Review 26, 259-74.
23. Ishkanian, A. 2006: From inclusion to exclusion: Armenian NGOs' participation in the PRSP. Journal of International Development 18, 729-40.
24. Kay, C. 1989: Latin American theories of development and underdevelopment. Routledge.
25. Kay, C. 1997: Latin America's exclusionary rural development in a neoliberal world. Paper presented at the 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico, 17-19 April.
26. Kennedy, C. and Murray, W.E. 2008: Running to stand still - Inequality in Chile 1968-2008. Paper presented at International Geographic Union Economic Geography Commission Conference, Barcelona, 21-24 August.
27. Killick, T. 2005: The politics of Ghana's budgetary system, CDD/ODI Policy Brief No. 2, CDD-Ghana.
28. Koeberle, S. and Stavreski, Z. 2006: Budget support: Concepts and issues. In Koeberle, S., Stavreski, Z. and Walliser, J., editors, Budget support as more effective aid. World Bank, 3-27.
29. Leiva, F. 2008: Toward a critique of Latin American neostructuralism. Latin American Politics and Society 50, 1-25.
30. Murray, W.E. 2006: Geographies of globalization. Routledge.
31. Murray, W.E. and Pastor, R. 2008: Growth with equity? Neostructuralism in Chile. In Murray, W.E. and Rabel, R., editors, Latin America today: Challenges, opportunities and trans-Pacific perspectives. New Zealand Institute of International Affairs/Victoria Institute for Links with Latin America.
32. Murray, W.E. and Rabel R. 2008: Latin America today: Challenges, opportunities and trans-Pacifi c perspectives. New Zealand Institute of International Affairs/Victoria Institute for Links with Latin America.
33. Ocampo, J. 1993: Terms of trade and center-periphery relations. In Sunkel, O., editor, Development from within: Toward a neostructuralist approach for Latin America. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 333-60.
34. OECD. 2008: Accra agenda for action. OECD.
35. Prebisch, R. 1949: Introduction: The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Economic Survey of Latin America 1948. ECLAC.
36. Prebisch, R. 1959: Commercial policy in under-developed countries. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 492, 251-73.
37. Saith, A. 2006: From universal values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in translation? Development and Change 37, 1167-99.
38. Silva, E. 1997: The politics of sustainable development: Native forest policy in Chile, Venezuela, Costa Rica and Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 29, 457-93.
39. Smith, H. 2005: Ownership and capacity: Do current donor approaches help or hinder the achievement of international and national targets for education? International Journal of Educational Development 25, 445-55.
40. Stiglitz, J.E. 1998: More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the post Washington Consensus. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, 7 January. Global Policy Forum, http:///www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209/4325.html, last accessed on 18 June 2010.
41. Stiglitz, J.E. 2005: The post Washington Consensus consensus. Presentation, Sao Paulo, 22 August 2005, http:///www.who.int/trade/glossary/story074/en/index.html, last accessed on 18 June 2010.
42. Storey, D., Bulloch, H. and Overton, J. 2005: The poverty consensus: Some limitations of the 'popular agenda'. Progress in Development Studies 5, 30-44.
43. Sunkel, O. 1990: The environmental dimension in development planning. ECLAC.
44. van Reesch, E. 2006: Ten years into the sector-wide approach: Did we do what we intended to do? In A Rich Menu for the Poor: Food for Thought on Effective Aid Politics. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DEK).
45. Wallace, T., Bornstein, L. and Chapman, J. 2007: The aid chain: Coercion and commitment in development NGOs. Intermediate Technology Publications/Practical Action Publications.
46. Wohlgemuth, L. 2006: Changing aid modalities in Tanzania (Policy Management Brief 17),ECDPM Policy Management Briefs. ECPDM.