Toward a critique of Latin American neostructuralism

Latin American Politics and Society

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1-25

  Leiva, Fernando Ignacio ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPITALISM; MODERNITY; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL ECONOMY; SOCIAL POLICY;

LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 64349099570     PISSN: 1531426X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00028.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bates, Robert, and Anne Krueger. 1993. Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Policy Reform: Evidence from Eight Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Bitar, Sergio. 1988. Neoliberalismo versus neoestructuralismo en América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL 34 (April).
3. Bouzas, Roberto. 2005. El nuevo regionalismo y el área de libre comercio de las Américas: Un enfoque menos indulgente [The New Regionalism and the Free Trade Area of the Americas: A Less Complacent View]. Revista de la CEPAL 85 (April): 7-12.
4. Colclough, Christopher. 1991. Structuralism versus Neoliberalism: An Introduction. In States and Markets: Neoliberalism and the Development Policy Debate, ed. Colclough and J. Manor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Eagleton, Terry. 1986. Against the Grain: Essays 1975-1985. London: Verso.
6. Eagleton, Terry. 1991. On Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
7. Eagleton, Terry. 1996. The Illusions of Postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 1990. Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: United Nations.
9. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 1992. Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach. Santiago: United Nations.
10. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 1994. Latin America and the Caribbean: Policies to Improve Linkages with the Global Economy. Santiago: United Nations.
11. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2004. Productive Development in Open Economies. Santiago: United Nations.
12. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2007. Social Cohesion: Inclusion and a Sense of Belonging in Latin America and the Caribbean. Press release. February 16.
13. Fine, Ben. 2000. Economic Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift? World Development 30, 12: 2057-70.
14. Giddens, Anthony. 1998. The Third Way and the Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Greaves, Edward F. 2004. Municipality and Community in Chile: Building Imagined Civic Communities and Its Impact on the Political. Politics and Society 34, 2: 203-30.
16. Green, Duncan. 2003. Silent Revolution: The Rise and Fall of Market Economics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
17. Gwynne, Robert, and Cristóbal Kay. 2004. Latin America Transformed: Globalization and Modernity. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Kay, Cristóbal. 1989. Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge.
19. Kay, Cristóbal, and Robert Gwynne. 2002. Relevance of Structuralist and Dependency Theories in the Neoliberal Period: A Latin American Perspective. In Critical Perspectives on Globalization and Neoliberalism in Developing Countries, ed. Richard L. Harris and Melinda J. Seid. Leiden: Brill Academic.
20. Kirby, Peadar. 2003. Introduction to Latin America: Twenty-First Century Challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21. Korzeniewicz, Roberto P., and William C. Smith. 2000. Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Latin America: Searching for the High Road to Globalization. Latin American Research Review 35, 3: 7-54.
22. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Leiva, Fernando Ignacio. 2005. From Pinochet's State Terrorism to the Politics of Participation. In Democracy in Chile: The Legacy of September 11, 1973, ed. Silvia Nagy-Zekmi and Leiva. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
24. Leiva, Fernando Ignacio. 2008. Latin American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Luhnow, David. 2005. Latin America's Left Takes Pragmatic Tack. Wall Street Journal, March 2: A15.
26. Machinea, José Luis, and Martin Hopenhayn. 2005. La esquiva equidad en el desarrollo latinoamericano: Una visión estructural, una aproximación multifacética [Elusive Equity in Latin American Development: A Structural Vision, A Multidimensional Approach]. Informe y Estudio Especial no. 14. Santiago: United Nations. June.
27. Meller, Patricio, ed. 1991. The Latin American Development Debate: Neostructuralism, Neomonetarism, and Adjustment Processes. Boulder: Westview Press.
28. Ocampo, José A., ed. 2000. Equidad, desarrollo y ciudadanía: Visión global. Vol. 1, Visión global; vol. 2, Agenda social; vol. 3, Agenda económica. Santiago/ Bogotá: CEPAL/Alfaomega.
29. Ocampo José A., and Juan Martín, eds. 2002. Globalization and Development. Santiago: United Nations.
30. Osorio, Jaime. 2002. Sobre las recetas para salir del subdesarrollo. Política y Cultura 17: 69-98.
31. Ottone, Ernesto, and Ana Sojo. 2007. Cohesión social: inclusión y sentido de pertenencia en América Latina y el Caribe [Social Cohesion: Inclusion and a Sense of Belonging in Latin America and the Caribbean]. Santiago: United Nations.
32. Petras, James, and Fernando I. Leiva. 1994. Democracy and Poverty in Chile: The Limits to Electoral Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
33. Prebisch, Raúl. 1981. Dialogue on Friedman and Hayek from the Standpoint of the Periphery. CEPAL Review 15: 153-74.
34. Robinson, William I. 2003. Transnational Conflicts: Central America, Social Change, and Globalization. London: Verso.
35. Robinson, William I. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Rosales, Osvaldo. 1991. Posibilidades y desafíos de una estrategia de desarrollo alternativo [Possibilities and Challenges for an Alternative Development Strategy]. In Chile: Problemas y perspectivas del actual modelo de desarrollo, vol. 2. Santiago: Sociedad Chilena de Economía Políitica.
37. Rosales, Osvaldo. 1995. Hacia una modernización solidaria: El debate entre progresismo y neoliberalismo. Debates y Propuestas: Revista del Instituto Fernando Otorgués 3: 98-126.
38. Rosenthal, Gert. 2000. Los años ochenta y noventa. In La CEPAL en sus 50 años: Notas de un seminario conmemorativo. Santiago: United Nations. 73-80.
39. Schild, Verónica. 2000. Neoliberalism's New Gendered Market Citizens: The "Civilizing" Dimensions of Social Programmes in Chile. Citizenship Studies 4, 3: 275-305.
40. Stallings, Barbara, and Wilson Peres. 2000. Growth, Employment, and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/ECLAC.
41. Sunkel, Osvaldo, ed.. 1993. Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
42. Weyland, Kurt. 2007. The Political Economy of Market Reform and a Revival of Structuralism. Latin American Research Review 42, 3: 235-50.