Poverty reduction strategy papers: A new convergence

World Development

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 53-69

  Craig, David ^a   Porter, Doug ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Africa; Governance; Poverty reduction; PRSP; Uganda

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; POWER RELATIONS;

UGANDA;

EID: 0037225043     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00147-X     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. ADB (1996). Review of the bank's program lending policies. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
2. ADB (1999). Review of ADB's program lending policies, November. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
3. Amis, P. (2000). Decentralization and central local funding mechanisms in Uganda: report for Danida. Kampala.
4. Anderson, P. (2000). Renewals. New Left Review, 11(1), 11.
5. Appleton, S. (2000). Poverty In Uganda 1999/2000. Preliminary estimates from Uganda national household survey. Mimeo. Kampala. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
6. BBC Correspondent (2001). Pro.ts of doom. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/correspondent/ newsid34000/1634502.stm.
7. Beck, U. (1998). Democracy without enemies. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Bevan, D., Palomba, G. (2000). Uganda: the budget and medium term expenditure framework set in a wider context. Background paper for the World Bank poverty reduction support credit. Mimeo. Department for International Development, The World Bank.
9. Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21-39.
10. Callinicos, A. (2000). Against the third way. Cambridge: Polity.
11. Carino, L., Flaman, R., Kulessa, M. (2000). Evaluation of decentralisation and local governance, UNDP role Uganda report. New York: German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and UNDP.
12. Cerny, P. G. (2000). Structuring the political arena: public goods, states and governance in a globalizing world. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: contemporary theories (pp. 21-35). London: Routledge.
13. Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts, DP 346, Sussex. Institute for Development Studies.
14. CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency) (2001). CIDA's experience with the PRSP process in Bolivia Ottawa: CIDA.
15. Collier, P. (2000). For a new relationship between donors and recipients: the end of conditionality. Washington, DC: World Bank.
16. Craig, D., and Porter, D. (1997). Framing participation: development projects, professionals and organisations. In M. Tegegn (Ed.), Development and patronage. A development in practice reader (pp. 50-57). Oxford: Oxfam.
17. DANIDA (Danish Ministry of Foreign A.airs) (2001). Contribution to the PRSP review. Copenhagen: DANIDA.
18. Dollar, D., and Svensson, J. (1998). What explains the success or failure of structural adjustment programs?. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19. Easterly, W. (2001). The illusive quest for growth: economist's adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
20. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Fforde, A. (2001). Light within the ASEAN gloom? The Vietnamese economy since the first Asian Economic Crisis (1997) and in the light of the 2001 downturn. In: Paper presented at the Vietnam update 2001: Governance in Vietnam: the Role of Organizations. National University of Singapore.
22. Friedman, T. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree. London: Harper Collins.
23. Goetz, A., Gaventa, J. (2001). Bringing citizen voice and client focus into service delivery. IDS Working Paper 138. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.
24. Government of Uganda (2000a). Poverty reduction strategy paper: Uganda's poverty eradication action plan: summary and main objectives. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
25. Government of Uganda (2000b). Learning from the poor. Uganda participatory poverty assessment report. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Kampala.
26. Government of Uganda (2001a). Fiscal decentralization in Uganda: the way forward, Kampala. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development/Donor Sub-group on Decentralization.
27. Government of Uganda (2001b). Poverty reduction strategy paper: progress report 2001. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Kampala.
28. Graham, H. (Ed.). (2000). Understanding health inequalities. Buckingham: Open University.
29. Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
31. Hellinger, D., Hansen-Kuhn, K., and Fehling, A. (2001). Stripping adjustment policies of their poverty reduction clothing: a new convergence in the challenge to current global economic management. Available at http://www.developmentgap.org/UN%20paper.pdf.
32. IMF/World Bank (2001) The challenge of maintaining long-term external debt sustainability, development committee (Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the bank and the fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries), DC2001-0013.
33. IMF/World Bank (2002). Review of the poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP) approach: early experience with interim PRSPs and full PRSPs.
34. ITAD (International Technical and Agricultural Development) (1999). District development project: evaluation review report. UN Capital Development Fund Evaluation, Kampala.
35. Kanbur, R. (1999). The strange case of the washington consensus: a brief note on John Williamson's ''What should the bank think about the Washington consensus?'' Available at http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/ sk145/papers/Washington%20Consensus.pdf.
36. Kanbur, R. (2001). Economic policy, distribution and poverty:the nature of disagreements. World Development, 29(6), 1083-1094.
37. Kanbur, R., and Squire, L. (1999). The evolution of thinking about poverty: exploring the interactions. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
38. Kasozi, A. B. K. (1997). Decentralization and social reconciliation in Uganda since 1986: a study of four districts. Kampala: UNDDSMS/UNDP.
39. Kullenberg, L., and Porter,. (1998). Accountability in decentralised planning and financing for rural services in Uganda. Entwicklung und Landlicher raum, 32(3), 11-15.
40. Levine, R., and Zervos, S. (1993). What have we learnt about policy and growth from cross country regressions. The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 82(2), 426-430.
41. Levitas, R. (1998). The inclusive society. London: Macmillan.
42. Lister, S. et al. (2001). Study to de.ne modalities for the proposed PMA "non-sectoral conditional grant". Report to PMA Group, Uganda.
43. Lynch, J. W., Davey-Smith, G., Kaplan, G. A., and House, J. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of both individual income psychosocial environment or material conditions. British Medical Journal, 320(29), 1200-1204.
44. Manning, N. (2001). The legacy of new public management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, V(67), 297-321.
45. Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.
46. Ministry of Social Development (2001). Pathways to opportunity: from social welfare to social development. Available at http://www.msp.govt.nz /keyinitiatives/ pathwaystoopportunity.html.
47. Moore, M. (1999). Death without taxes: democracy, state capacity and dependence in the fourth world. In M. Robinson and G. White (Eds.), The democratic developmental state: politics and institutional design (pp. 84-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Musisi, K. (1998). Decentralisation in Uganda: report of the national forum on the implementation of decentralisation. Kampala.
49. Naim, M. (1999). Fads and fashion in economic reforms: Washington consensus or Washington confusion? Working Draft of a paper prepared for the IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, Washington, DC. Available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/1999/reforms/Naim.HTM.
50. Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., and Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: crying out for change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. New Zealand Treasury (2001). Towards an inclusive economy. Available at http://www.treasury.govt.nz/ working papers/2001/01-15.asp.
51. Njinkeu, D. (2001). Treatment of pro-poor growth in PRSPs. African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi.
52. Obwona, M., Ste.ensen, J., Trollegaad, S., Mwanga, Y., Luwangwa, F., Twodo, B., Ojoo, A., and Seguya, F. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and sub-national government finance in relation to service provision in Uganda. Washington, DC: NALAD and World Bank.
53. Onyach-Olaa, M., Porter, D. (1999). Local government performance and accountability. In: Proceedings of African Union of Local Authorities Conference, Kampala.
54. Parker, A., and Serrano, R. (2000). Promoting good local governance through social funds and decentralization. Washington, DC and New York: World Bank and UN Capital Development Fund.
55. Porter, D., and Craig, D. (2002). Devolving the hydra, respecting local domains: decentralised approaches to governance in indigenous Australia. (da.craigαuckland.ac.nz).
56. Porter, D., and Onyach-Olaa, M. (1999). Inclusive planning and allocation for rural services. Development in Practice, 1/2(February), 56-67.
57. Ravallion, M. (2000). Growth, inequality and poverty: looking beyond averages. World Bank Economic Growth Research Working Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/research/growth/ pd.les/growthequality∝verty.pdf.
58. Rodriguez, F., and Rodrik, D. (1999). Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic's guide to the cross national evidence. NBER working paper 7081. Available at www.nber.org/papers/w7081.
59. Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high quality growth: what are they and how to get them? Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 2-31.
60. Rodrik, D. (2001). Trading in Illusions. Foreign policy, March-April. Available at http://www.foreignpolicy. com/issuer̄apr01/rodrick.html.
61. Rose, N. (1999a). Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Rose, N. (1999b). Inventiveness in politics. Economy and Society, 28(3), 467-493.
63. Ross, N., Wolfson, M., Dunn, J. R., Berthelot, J.-M., Kaplan, G. A., and Lynch, J. W. (2000). Relation between income inequality in Canada and in the United States: cross-sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. BMJ (320), 898-902.
64. Rowden, R. A. (2001). World of debt. The American Prospect, 12(2), 2-16, Available at http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/12/rowden-r.html.
65. Royal Government of Cambodia (2000) Interim poverty reduction strategy paper. Phnom Penh.
66. Rugumayo, C. (1999). A local government country profile study of Uganda, report for NORAD, Pretoria. Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
67. Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand reforms? World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123-131.
68. Stiglitz, J. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the post-Washington consensus. The 1998 WIDER lecture, Helsinki, Finland January 7. Available at www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/extme/js-010798/ wider.htm.
69. Stiglitz, J. (1999). Whither reform? Ten years of the transition. Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, April 28-30.
70. Stiglitz, J. (2000). Unravelling the Washington consensus: an interview with Joseph Stiglitz. Multinational Monitor, 21(4). Available at www.essential.org/monitor/ mm2000/00april/interview.html.
71. Villadsen, S., and Lubanga, F. (Eds.). (1996). Democratic decentralization in Uganda: a new approach to local governance. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.
72. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
73. Wade, R. (2001a). Economic growth and the role of government: or how to stop New Zealand from falling out of the OECD. Paper presented to the Catching the Knowledge Wave Conference August 1-3; Aukland, New Zealand. Available at www.knowledgewave.org.nz.
74. Wade, R. (2001b). Winners and losers. Economist Print edition, April 26 Available at http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm? Story-587251.
75. Wilkinson, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: the affictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
76. Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? (pp. 18-23). Washington DC: IIE.
77. Williamson, J. (1999). What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus? Paper prepared as a background to the World Bank's World Development Report 2000. Institute for International Economics Papers. Available at http://207.238.152.36/papers/williamson0799.htm.
78. World Bank (1991). Assistance Strategies to Reduce Poverty. Washington, DC; The World Bank.
79. World Bank (1992a). Poverty handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
80. World Bank (1992b). Operational Directive 4.15. Washington, DC.
81. World Bank (2000a). World development report: attacking poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. World Bank (2000b). World bank aid and reform in Africa: lessons from ten case studies. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/developmentnews.
83. World Bank (2001a). Reviewing poverty reduction strategy program. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/developmentnews/stories/html/ 080601a.htm.
84. World Bank (2001b). World development report: building institutions for markets. New York: Oxford Univertsity Press.