Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2400-2407

  Randall, William M ^a   Smith, Janette L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conflict; Go NoGo; Inhibition; N2; P3

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONFLICT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051703626     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aron A.R. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:214-228.
2. Azizian A., Freitas A., Parvaz M.A., Squires N.K. Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:253-260.
3. Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R., van der Molen M.W. Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition. Psychol Res 2003, 67:266-279.
4. Banquet J.P., Renault B., Lesevre N. Effect of task and stimulus probability on evoked potentials. Biol Psychol 1981, 13:203-214.
5. Bartholow B.D., Pearson M.A., Dickter C.L., Sher K.J., Fabiani M., Gratton G. Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:33-42.
6. Boksem M.A.S., Meijman T.F., Lorist M.M. Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:123-132.
7. Bokura K., Yamaguchi S., Kobayashi S. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:2224-2232.
8. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.C., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001, 108:624-652.
9. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:1172-1182.
10. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A., van Staveren A.S.J. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:1660-1671.
11. Connor W.H., Lang P.J. Cortical slow-wave and cardiac rate responses in stimulus orientation and reaction time conditions. J Exp Psychol 1969, 82:310-320.
12. Damen E.J.P., Brunia C.H.M. Changes in heart rate and slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:700-713.
13. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: Do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply an oddball effect?. Biol Psychol 2008, 77:324-336.
14. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?. Brain Cogn 2006, 62:98-112.
15. Donkers F.C.L., Van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cogn 2004, 56:165-176.
16. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 1999, 101:267-291.
17. Geczy I., Czigler I., Balazs L. Effects of cue information on response production and inhibition measured by event-related potentials. Acta Physiol Hungarica 1999, 86:37-44.
18. Gehring W.J., Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf 1992, 18:198-216.
19. Hajcak G., Mosera J.S., Yeung N., Simons R.F. On the ERN and the significance of errors. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:151-160.
20. Harnishfeger KK. The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In Dempster FN, Brainerd DJ, editors. Interference and inhibition in cognition. London: Academic Press 1995;175-04.
21. Heil M., Osman A., Wiegelmann J., Rolke B., Hennighausen E. N200 in the Eriksen-task: Inhibitory executive processes?. J Psychophysiol 2000, 14:218-225.
22. Jodo E., Inoue K. Effects of practice on the P300 in a Go/NoGo task. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 76:249-257.
23. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 82:477-482.
24. Kok A. Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol 1986, 23:21-38.
25. Kok A., Ramautar J.R., De Ruiter M.B., Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiol 2004, 41:9-20.
26. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralised readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 99:19-27.
27. Kopp B., Rist F., Mattler U. N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioural tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiol 1996, 33:282-294.
28. Kornhuber H.H., Deecke L. Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passive bewegungen des menschen: Bereitschaftspotential une reafferente potentiale. Pflügers Archiv 1965, 284:1-17.
29. Lansbergen M.M., Böcker K.B.E., Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L. Neural correlates of stopping and self-reported impulsivity. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:2089-2103.
30. MacKay W.A., Bonnet M. CNV, stretch reflex and reaction time correlates of preparation for movement direction and force. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 76:47-62.
31. MacLeod C, Dodd M, Sheard E, Wilson D, Bibi U. In opposition to inhibition. In Ross B, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol 43. San Diego: Elsevier Science, 2003:163-214.
32. Nakata H., Inui K., Nishihira Y., Hatta A., Sakamoto M., Kida T., et al. Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:361-368.
33. Nakata H., Inui K., Wasaka T., Tamura Y., Akatsuke K., Kida T., et al. Higher anticipated force required a stronger inhibitory process in go/nogo tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:1669-1676.
34. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J.D. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiol 2004, 41:157-160.
35. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003, 3:17-26.
36. Nigg J.T. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 2000, 126:220-246.
37. Ofek E., Pratt H. Ear advantage and attention: an ERP study of auditory cued attention. Hear Res 2004, 189:107-118.
38. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Weller B.J., Kopell B.S. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1985, 60:423-434.
39. Ramautar J.R., Kok A., Ridderinkhof K.R. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain Cogn 2004, 56:234-252.
40. Ramautar J.R., Kok A., Ridderinkhof K.R. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:96-109.
41. Schmajuk M., Liotti M., Busse L., Woldorff M.G. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:384-395.
42. Schröger E. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli following transient shifts of spatial attention in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 1993, 36:183-207.
43. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifact, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiol 1986, 23:695-703.
44. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual go/nogo tasks. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1977, 43:864-875.
45. Smith JL, Douglas KM. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging, in press. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.03.002.
46. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol 2006, 61:121-133.
47. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:343-355.
48. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:704-714.
49. Sterr A. Preparing not to move: Does no-response priming affect advance movement preparation processes in a response priming task?. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:154-159.
50. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed 1996, HarperCollins, New York.
51. Van Boxtel G.J.M., Böcker K.B.E. Cortical measures of anticipation. J Psychophysiol 2004, 18:61-76.
52. van 't Ent D, Apkarian P. Motoric response inhibition in finger movement and saccadic eye movement: a comparative study. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1058-072.
53. van Veen V., Carter C.S. The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 14:593-602.
54. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
55. Wang Y., Tian S., Wang H., Cui L., Zhang Y. Event-related potentials in a no-go task involving response-tendency conflict. Clin Electroenceph 2002, 33:82-85.
56. Weerts T.C., Lang P.J. The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV). Biol Psychol 1973, 1:1-19.
57. Wijnen J.G., Ridderinkhof K.R. Response inhibition in motor and oculomotor conflict tasks: different mechanisms, different dynamics?. Brain Cogn 2007, 63:260-270.
58. Wright M.J., Geffen G.M., Geffen L.B. Event related potentials during covert orientation of visual attention: effects of cue validity and directionality. Biol Psychol 1995, 41:183-202.