Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: Do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?

Biological Psychology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 324-336

  Dimoska, Aneta ^a   Johnstone, Stuart J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Inhibition; Lateralised readiness potential (LRP); Stimulus probability; Stop signal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AROUSAL; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 39249084616     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R., and van der Molen M.W. Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition. Psychol. Res. 67 (2003) 266-279
2. Band G.P.H., and van Boxtel G.J.M. Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol. 101 (1999) 179-211
3. Band G.P.H., van der Molen M.W., and Logan G. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol. 112 (2003) 105-142
4. Banquet J.P., Renault B., and Lesevre N. Effect of task and stimulus probability on evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol. 13 (1981) 203-214
5. Bedard A.-C., Ickowicz A., Logan G.D., Hogg-Johnson S., Schachar R., and Tannock R. Selective inhibition in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder off and on stimulant medication. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 31 (2003) 315-327
6. Bedard A.-C., Nichols S., Barbosa J.A., Schachar R., Logan G.D., and Tannock R. The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span. Dev. Neuropsychol. 21 (2002) 93-111
7. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Hoeksma M.R., Talsma D., and Verbaten M.N. The pure electrophysiology of stopping. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 55 (2005) 191-198
8. Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Canavan A.G., and Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behaviour. Physiol. Rev. 70 (1990) 1-41
9. Bruin K.J., and Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 (2002) 1172-1182
10. Coles M.G. Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 251-269
11. Coles M.G.H., Gratton G., Bashore T.R., Eriksen C.W., and Donchin E. A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 11 (1985) 529-553
12. Czigler I., Csibra G., and Ambro A. Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: an event-related potential study. Biol. Psychol. 43 (1996) 27-40
13. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?. Brain Cogn. 62 (2006) 98-112
14. Dimoska A., Johnstone S., Barry R., and Clarke A. Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol. Psychiat. 54 (2003) 1345-1354
15. Donkers F.C.L., and van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in Go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cogn. 56 (2004) 165-176
16. Duncan-Johnson C.C., and Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14 (1977) 456-467
17. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol. Psychol. 35 (1993) 123-138
18. Eimer M., and Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 1737-1747
19. Enoki H., Sanada S., Yoshinaga H., Oka E., and Ohtahara S. The effects of age on the N200 component of the auditory event-related potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 1 (1993) 161-167
20. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. 101 (1999) 267-491
21. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Christ S., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol. Psychol. 51 (2000) 87-107
22. Falkenstein M., Koshlykova V.N., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 36-43
23. Filipovic S.R., Jahanshani M., and Rothwell J.C. Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision. Exp. Brain Res. 132 (2000) 411-415
24. Gehring W.J., Coles M.G.H., Meyer D.E., and Donchin E. A brain potential manifestation of error-related processing. Perspect. Event-Related Potentials Res.: EEG 44 Suppl. 44 (1995) 261-272
25. Hanes D.P., and Carpenter R.H.S. Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Res. 39 (1999) 2777-2791
26. Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., Anderson J.W., and Coyle S.F. Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an oddball task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 24 (1996) 223-238
27. Johnstone S.J., Pleffer C.B., Barry R.J., Clarke A.R., and Smith J.L. Development of inhibitory processing during the Go/Nogo task. J. Psychophysiol. 19 (2005) 11-23
28. Karlin L., and Martz M.J. Response probability and sensory-evoked potentials. In: Kornblum S. (Ed). Attention and Performance, vol. IV (1973), Academic Press, New York 175-184
29. Kok A., Ramautar J., de Ruiter M., Band G.P.H., and Ridderinkhof K.R. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful inhibition in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 9-20
30. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., and Rist F. N2,P3 and the lateralised readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 99 (1996) 19-27
31. Kutas M., and Donchin E. Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 202 (1980) 95-115
32. Lappin J.S., and Eriksen C.W. Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. J. Exp. Psychol. 72 (1966) 805-811
33. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a user's guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 189-239
34. Logan G.D., and Burkell J. Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: a comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12 (1986) 549-563
35. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B., and Davis K.A. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 10 (1984) 276-291
36. Li C.-R., Huang C., Constable T., and Sinha R. Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task. NeuroImage 32 (2006) 1918-1929
37. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 203-208
38. Miller J., Hackley S.A., and Ulrich R. Jacknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 99-115
39. Mordkoff J.T., and Gianaros P.J. Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 347-360
40. Näätanen R. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol. Bull. 92 (1982) 605-640
41. Näätanen R., and Michie P.T. Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol. Psychol. 8 (1979) 81-136
42. Nieuwenhuis S., Ridderinkhof K.R., Blom J., Band G.P.H., and Kok A. Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 752-760
43. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3 (2003) 17-26
44. Ollman R.T. Simple reactions with random countermanding of the "Go" signal. In: Kornblum S. (Ed). Attention and Performance IV (1973), Academic Press, New York 571-581
45. Pailing P.E., and Segalowitz S.J. The error-related negativity as a state and trait measure: motivation, personality, and ERPs in response to errors. Psychophysiology 41 8 (2004) 4-95
46. Pfefferbaum A., and Ford J.M. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.: Evoked Potentials 71 (1988) 55-63
47. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Weller B.J., and Kopell B.S. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60 (1985) 423-434
48. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R.J., Miller G.A., Ritter W., Ruchkin D.S., Rugg M.D., and Taylor M.J. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 127-152
49. Ramautar J., Kok A., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain Cogn. 56 (2004) 234-252
50. Ramautar J.R., Kok A., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol. Psychol. 72 (2006) 96-109
51. Rockstroh B., Mueller M., Cohen R., and Elbert T. Probing the functional brain state during P300-evocation. J. Psychophysiol. 6 (1992) 175-184
52. Ruchkin D.S., and Glaser E.M. Simple digital filters for examining CNV and P300 on a single trial basis. In: Otto D. (Ed). Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Brain Potential (1978), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 579-581
53. Schmajuk M., Liotti M., Busse L., and Worldoff M.G. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 44 3 (2006) 384-395
54. Schwarzenau P., Falkenstein M., Hoorman P., and Hohnsbein J. A new method for the estimation of the onset of lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 30 (1998) 110-117
55. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., and Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 695-703
56. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (1989), HarperCollins, New York
57. van Boxtel G.J.M. Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data. Behav. Res. Meth. Ins. C. 30 (1998) 87-102
58. van Boxtel G.J., van der Molen M.W., Jennings J.R., and Brunia C.H. A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol. Psychol. 58 (2001) 229-262
59. Van Veen V., and Carter C.S. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol. Behav. 77 (2002) 477-482