Characterization of the binding profile of peptide to transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) using Gaussian process regression

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 865-870

  Ren, Yonggang ^a   Wu, Bin ^a   Pan, Yuzhu ^a   Lv, Fenglin ^a   Kong, Xiangjun ^a   Luo, Xiaoli ^a   Li, Yuanchao ^b   Yang, Qingwu ^b  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Gaussian process; Peptide; Transporter associated with antigen processing

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN PROCESSING; BINDING AFFINITIES; BINDING PROFILES; CYTOSOLS; DIVERSE PROPERTIES; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; GAUSSIAN PROCESS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; LIGAND BINDING; MACHINE-LEARNING; NON-LINEAR METHODS; NON-LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PEPTIDE BINDING; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PROTEIN FRAGMENTS; SEQUENCE PATTERNS; SPECIFIC RECOGNITION; TRANSPORTER ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIGEN PROCESSING;

ANTIGENS; BINDING ENERGY; ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDS;

PEPTIDES;

ALANINE; ARGININE; ASPARAGINE; ASPARTIC ACID; CYSTEINE; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTAMINE; GLYCINE; HISTIDINE; ISOLEUCINE; LEUCINE; LYSINE; METHIONINE; PHENYLALANINE; PROLINE; SERINE; THREONINE; TRANSPORTER ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIGEN PROCESSING 1; TRYPTOPHAN; TYROSINE; VALINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BINDING AFFINITY; GAUSSIAN PROCESS; HUMAN; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR SYSTEM; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 80051664115     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Garcia K.C. Molecular interactions between extracellular components of the T-cell receptor signaling complex. Immunol. Rev. 1999, 172:73-85.
2. Lankat-Buttgereit B., Tampe R. The transporter associated with antigen processing TAP: structure and function. FEBS Lett. 1999, 464:108-112.
3. Lankat-Buttgereit B., Tampe R. The transporter associated with antigen processing: function and implications in human diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82:187-204.
4. Gadola S.D., Moins-Teisserenc H.T., Trowsdale J., Gross W.L., Cerundolo V. TAP deficiency syndrome. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2000, 121:173-178.
5. van Endert P.M., Tampe R., Meyer T.H., Tisch R., Bach J.F., McDevitt H.O. A sequential model for peptide binding and transport by the transporters associated with antigen processing. Immunity 1994, 1:491-500.
6. Larsen M.V., Lundegaard C., Lamberth K., Buus S., Lund O., Nielsen M. Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope prediction. BMC Bioinf. 2007, 8:424.
7. Brusic V., van Endert P., Zeleznikow J., Daniel S., Hammer J., Petrovsky N. A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter. In Silico Biol. 1999, 1:109-121.
8. Peters B., Bulik S., Tampe R., van Endert P.M., Holzhutter H.G. Identifying MHC class I epitopes by predicting the TAP transport efficiency of epitope precursors. J. Immunol. 2003, 171:1741-1749.
9. Doytchinova I.A., Hemsley S., Flower D.R. Transporter associated with antigen processing preselection of peptides binding to the MHC: a bioinformatic evaluation. J. Immunol. 2004, 173:6813-6819.
10. TAP: a system for prediction of peptide binding to the human transporter associated with antigen processing. Immun. Res. 2006, 2:3.
11. Lam T.H., Mamitsuka H., Ren E.C., Tong J.C. TAP Hunter: a SVM-based system for predicting TAP ligands using local description of amino acid sequence. Immun. Res. 2010, 6:S6.
12. Bhasin M., Raghava G.P. Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM. Protein Sci. 2004, 13:596-607.
13. Larsen M.V., Lundegaard C., Lamberth K., Buus S., Brunak S., Lund O., Nielsen M. An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: a combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35:2295-2303.
14. Tenzer S., Peters B., Bulik S., Schoor O., Lemmel C., Schatz M.M., Kloetzel P.M., Rammensee H.G., Schild H., Holzhütter H.G. Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage,TAP transport and MHC class I binding. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62:1025-1037.
15. Doytchinova I.A., Flower D.R., Class I. T-cell epitope prediction: improvements using a combination of proteasome cleavage, TAP affinity, and MHC binding. Mol. Immunol. 2006, 43:2037-2044.
16. Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 2006, MIT Press, MA.
17. Zhou P., Tian F., Chen X., Shang Z. Modeling and prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using genetic algorithm-Gaussian processes. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2008, 90:792-802.
18. Pan Y., Lv F., Tian F., Luo X., Kong X., Li Y., Yang Q. Prediction of waters mobility and disorder in protein crystals using novel local hydrophobic descriptors. Mol. Inf. 2010, 29:195-201.
19. Tian F., Yang L., Lv F., Zhou P. Predicting liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides from the Drosophila melanogaster proteome by machine learning approaches. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 644:10-16.
20. Zhou P., Chen X., Wu Y., Shang Z. Gaussian process: an alternative approach for QSAM modeling of peptides. Amino Acids 2010, 38:199-212.
21. Wold S., Ruhe A., Wold H., Dunn W.J. The collinearity problem in linear regression--the partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 1984, 5:735-743.
22. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning internal representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986, 323:533-536.
23. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20:273-293.
24. Zhou P., Tian F., Lv F., Shang Z. Comprehensive comparison of eight statistical modelling methods used in quantitative structure-retention relationship studies for liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides generated by protease digestion of the Escherichia coli proteome. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:3107-3116.
25. 2!. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20:269-276.
26. Diez-Rivero C.M., Chenlo B., Zuluaga P., Reche P.A. Quantitative modeling of peptide binding to TAP using support vector machine, Proteins 2010, 78:63-72.
27. Daniel S., Brusic V., Caillat-Zucman S., Petrovsky N., Harrison L., Riganelli D., Sinigaglia F., Gallazzi F., Hammer J., van Endert P.M. Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. J. Immunol. 1998, 161:617-624.
28. Toseland C.P., Clayton D.J., Mcsparron H., Hemsley S.L., Blythe M.J., Paine K., Doytchinova I.A., Guan P., Hattotuwagama C.K., Flower D.R. AntiJen: a quantitative immunology database integrating functional, thermodynamic, kinetic, biophysical, and cellular data. Immun. Res. 2005, 1:4.
29. Tian F., Yang L., Lv F., Yang Q., Zhou P. In silico quantitative prediction of peptides binding affinity to human MHC molecule: an intuitive quantitative structure-activity relationship approach. Amino Acids 2009, 36:535-554.
30. Tian F., Lv F., Zhou P., Yang Q., Jalbout A.F. Toward prediction of binding affinities between the MHC protein and its peptide ligands using quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach. Protein Pept. Lett. 2008, 15:1033-1043.
31. Heravi M.J., Parastar F. Use of artificial neural networks in a QSAR study of anti-HIV activity for a large group of HEPT derivatives. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40:147-154.
32. Obrezanova O., Csanyi G., Gola J.M.R., Segall M.D. Gaussian processes: a method for automatic QSAR modeling of ADME properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47:1847-1857.
33. Gubler B., Daniel S., Armandola E.A., Hammer J., Caillat-Zucman S., van Endert P.M. Substrate selection by transporters associated with antigen processing occurs during peptide binding to TAP. Mol. Immunol. 1998, 35:427-433.
34. van Endert P.M. Peptide selection for presentation by HLA class I: a role for the human transporter associated with antigen processing. Immunol. Res. 1996, 15:265-279.
35. Falk K., Rotzschke O., Stevanovic S., Jung G., Rammensee H.G. Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature 1991, 351:290-296.