Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 596-607

  Bhasin, Manoj ^a   Raghava, G P S ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Cascade SVM; CTL epitopes; TAP binder; TAP transporter

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; BINDING PROTEIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; EPITOPE; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN TAP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; AMINO ACIDS, AROMATIC; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; CARRIER PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ELECTROSTATICS; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS I; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 1342268087     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03373104     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abele, R. and Tampe, R. 1999. Function of the transport complex TAP in cellular immune recognition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1461: 405-419.
2. Androlewicz. M.J. and Cresswell, P. 1994. Human transporters associated with antigen processing possess a promiscuous peptide-binding site. Immunity 1: 7-14.
3. Bhasin, M., Singh, H., and Raghava, G.P.S. 2003. MHCBN: A comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides. Bioinformatics 19: 666-667.
4. Bhaskaran, R. and Ponnuswamy, P.K. 1988. Positional flexibilities of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 32: 241-255.
5. Blythe, M.J., Doytchinova, I.A., and Flower, D.R. 2002. JenPep: A database of quantitative functional peptide data for immunology. Bioinformatics 18: 434-439.
6. Brown. M.P.S., Grundy, W.N., Lion. D., Cristianini, N., Sugnet, C.W., Furey, T.S., Ares Jr., M., and Haussler, D. 2000. Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 262-297.
7. Brusic, V., van Endert, P., Zeleznikow, J., Daniel, S., Hammer, J., and Petrovsky, N. 1999. A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter. In Silico Biol. 1: 9-21.
8. Bull, H.B. and Breese, K. 1974. Surface tension of amino acid solutions: A hydrophobicity scale of the amino acid residues. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 161: 665-670.
9. Chothia, C. 1975. Structural invariants in protein folding. Nature 254: 304-308.
10. Cristianini, N. and Shawe-Taylor, J. 2000. Support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Daniel, S., Brusic, V., Caillat-Zucman, S., Petrovsky, N., Harrison, L., Riganelli, D., Sinigaglia, F., Gallazzi, F., Hammer, J., and van Endert, P.M. 1998. Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. J. Immunol. 161: 617-624.
12. De Groot, A.S., Sbai, H., Aubin, C.S., McMurry, J., and Martin, W. 2002. Immuno-informatics: Mining genomes for vaccine components. Immunol. Cell Biol. 80: 255-269.
13. DeLisi, C. and Berzofsky, J.A. 1985. T-cell antigenic sites tend to be amphipathic structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 7048-7052.
14. Ding, C.H.Q. and Dubchak, I. 2001. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics 17: 349-358.
15. Donnes, P. and Elofsson, A. 2002. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 25.
16. Doytchinova, I.A. and Flower, D.R. 2001. Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: coMFA and coMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201. J. Med. Chem. 44: 3572-3581.
17. Eisenberg, D. 1984. Three-dimensional structure of membrane and surface proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53: 595-623.
18. Gulukota, K., Sidney, J., Sette, A., and DeLisi, C. 1997. Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules. J. Mol. Biol. 267: 1258-1267.
19. Hammerling, G.J., Vogt, A.B., and Kropshofer, H. 1999. Antigen processing and presentation: Towards the millennium. Immunol. Rev. 172: 5-11.
20. Heemels, M.T., and Ploegh, H.L. 1994. Substrate specificity of allelic variants of the TAP peptide transporter. Immunity 1: 775.
21. Heemels, M.T., Schuhmacher, T.N.M., Wonigeit, K., and Ploegh, H.L. 1993. Peptide translocation by variants of the transporter associated with antigen processing. Science 262: 2059-2063.
22. Holzhutterer, H.G., Frommel, C., and Kloetzel, P.M. 1999. A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20 S proteasome. J. Mol. Biol. 286: 1251-1265.
23. Hopp, T.P. and Woods, K.R. 1981. Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78: 3824-3828.
24. Janin, J. and Wodak, S. 1978. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins, J. Mol. Biol. 125: 357-386.
25. Joachims, T. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in kernel methods: Support vector learning (eds. B. Scholkopf et al.), pp. 42-56, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Jones, D.D. 1975. ProtScale Tool: Amino acid scale: Refractivity. J. Theor. Biol. 50: 167-184.
27. Karplus, P.A. and Schultz, G.E. 1985. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwissenschaften 72: 212-213.
28. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157: 105-132.
29. Lankat-Buttgereit. B. and Tampe, R. 1999. The transporter associated with antigen processing TAP: Structure and function.FEBS Lett. 464: 108-112.
30. - 2002. The transporter associated with antigen processing: Function and implications in human diseases. Physiol. Rev. 82: 187-204.
31. Levitt, M. 1978. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry 17: 4277-4285.
32. Manavalan, P. and Ponnuswamy, P.K. 1978. Hydrophobic character of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Nature 275: 673-674.
33. Margalit, H., Spouge, J.L., Cornette, J.L., Cease, K.B., Delisi, C., and Berzofsky, J.A. 1987. Prediction of immunodominant helper T cell antigenic sites from the primary sequence. J. Immunol. 138: 2213-2229.
34. Neefjes, J., Gottfried, E., Roelse, J., Gromme, M., Obst, R., Hammerling, G.J., and Momburg, F. 1995. Analysis of the fine specificity of rat, mouse and human TAP peptide transporters. Eur. J. Immunol. 25: 1133-1136.
35. Nussbaum, A.K., Kuttler, C., Tenzer, S., and Schild, H. 2003. Using the World Wide Web for predicting CTL epitopes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15: 69-74.
36. Parker, J.M., Gao, D., and Hodges, R.S. 1986. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: Correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 25: 5425-5432.
37. Parker, K.C., Bednarek, M.A., and Coligan, J.E. 1994. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J. Immunol. 152: 163-175.
38. Peters, B., Bulik, S., Tampe, R., Van Endert, P.M., and Holzhutter, H.G. 2003. Identifying MHC class I epitopes by predicting the TAP transport efficiency of epitope precursors. J. Immunol. 171: 1741-1749.
39. Ragone, R., Facchiano, F., Facchiano, A., Facchiano, A.M., and Colonna, G. 1989. Flexibility plot of proteins. Protein Eng. 2: 497-504.
40. Rammensee, G., Friede, T., and Stevanoviic, S. 1995. MHC ligands and peptide motifs: First listing, Immunogenetics 41: 178-228.
41. Rose, G.D., Geselowitz, A.R., Lesser, G.J., Lee, R.H., and Zehfus, M.H. 1985. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 229: 834-838.
42. Schirle, M., Weinschenk, T., and Stevanovic, S. 2001. Combining computer algorithms with experimental approaches permits the rapid and accurate identification of T cell epitopes from defined antigens. J. Immunol. Methods 257: 1-16.
43. Schumacher, T.N., Kantesaria, D.V., Heemels, M.T., Ashton-Rickardt, P.G., Shepherd, J.C., Fruh, K., Yang, Y., Peterson, P.A., Tonegawa, S., and Ploegh, H.L. 1994. Peptide length and sequence specificity of the mouse TAP1/TAP2 translocator. J. Exp. Med. 179: 533-540.
44. Singh, H. and Raghava, G.P.S. 2003, ProPredl: Prediction of promiscuous MHC class I binding sites. Bioinformatics 19: 1009-1014.
45. Uebel, S. and Tampe, R. 1999. Specificity of the proteasome and the TAP transporter. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11: 203-208.
46. Uebel, S., Kraas, W., Kienle, S., Wiesmuller, K.H., Jung, G., and Tampe, R. 1997. Recognition principle of the TAP transporter disclosed by combinatorial peptide libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 8976-8981.
47. van Endert, P.M., Tampé, R., Meyer, T.H., Tisch, J., Bach, F., and McDevitt, H.O. 1994. A sequential model for peptide binding and transport by the transporters associated with antigen processing. Immunity 1: 491-500.
48. van Endert, P.M., Riganelli, D., Greco, G., Fleischhauer, K., Sidney, J., Sette, A., and Bach, J.F. 1995. The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing. J. Exp. Med. 182: 1883-1895.
49. van Endert, P.M., Saveanu, L., Hewitt, E.W., and Lehner, P. 2002. Powering the peptide pump: TAP crosstalk with energetic nucleotides. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 454-461.
50. Zhang, C.T. and Chou, K.C. 1995. An analysis of protein folding type prediction by seed-propagated sampling and jackknife test. J. Protein Chem. 14: 583-593