Quantitative modeling of peptide binding to TAP using support vector machine

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 63-72

  Diez Rivero, Carmen M ^a   Chenlo, Bernardo ^a   Zuluaga, Pilar ^a   Reche, Pedro A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Antigen processing; Peptide; Prediction; Svm; Tap; Weka

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTER ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIGEN PROCESSING 1; ABC TRANSPORTER; PEPTIDE; TRANSPORTER ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIGEN PROCESSING (TAP);

ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

GALLIRALLUS AUSTRALIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 77949368187     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22535     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Paul WE. Fundamental immunology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
2. Von Boehmer H. Positive and negative selection of the ab T cell repertoire in. vivo. Curr Opin Immunol 1991; 3: 210-215.
3. Craiu A, Akopiau T, Goldberg A, Rock KL. IVo distinct proteolytic processes in the generation of a major histocompatibility complex class I-presented peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 1997; 94: 10850-10855. (Pubitemid 27430824)
4. Yewdell JW, Haeryfar SM. Understanding presentation of viral antigens to CD8+ T cells in vivo: the key to rational vaccine design. Annu Rev Immunol 2005; 26: 651-682.
5. Pamer E, Cresswell P. Mechanisms of MHC class I-restricted antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol 1998; 16: 323-358. (Pubitemid 28183368)
6. YorkIA,GoldbergAL,MoXY,RockKL. ProteolysisandclassImajorhistocompatibilitycomplexantigenpresentation. ImmunolRev1999;172:49-66.(Pubitemid30000468)
7. Serwold T, Gonzalez F, Kim J, Jacob N. ERAAP customizes peptides for MHC Class I molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 2002; 419: 480-483. (Pubitemid 34293432)
8. BeekmanNJ,VanVeelenPA,VanHallT,NeisigA,SijtsA,CampsM,Kloetzel.PM, NeefjesJJ,MeliefCJ,OssendorpF. AbrogationofCTLepitopeprocessingbysingleaminoacidsubstitutionflankingtheC- terminalproteasomecleavagesite.JImmunol2000;164:1898-1905.(Pubitemid30108744)
9. SmithKD,LutzCT.Peptide-dependentexpressionofH.LA-B7onantigenprocessing- deficientT2cells.JImmunol1996;156:3755-3764.(Pubitemid26137661)
10. Zhong W, Reche PA, Lai CC, Reinhold B, Reinherz EL. Genome-wide characterization of a viral cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope repertoire. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 45135-45144. (Pubitemid 37432646)
11. Wang M, Lamberth K, Hamdahl M, Roder G, Stryhn A, Larsen MV, Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Tang ST, Dziegiel MH, Rosenkvist J, Pedersen AE, Buus S, Claesson MH, Lund O. CTL epitopes for influenza A including the H5N1 bird flu; genome-, pathogen-, and HLA-wide screening. Vaccine 2007; 25: 2823-2831.
12. Uebel S, Krass P, Kienle S, Wiesmuller KH, Jung G, Tampe R. Recognition principle of the TAP transporter disclosed by combinatorial peptide libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 8976-8981.
13. Aekerman AL, Cresswell P. Cellular mechanisms governing crosspresentation of exogenous antigens. Nat Immunol 2004; 5: 678-684.
14. Androlewicz MJ, Cresswell P. Human transporters associated with antigen processing possess a promiscuous peptide-binding site. Immunity 1994; 1: 7-14.
15. Abele R, Tampe R. The ABCs of immunology: structure and function of TAP, the transporter associated with antigen processing. Physiology (Bethesda) 2004; 19: 216-224.
16. Shepherd JC, Schumacher TN, Ashton-Rickardt PG, Imaeda S, Ploegh HL, Janeway CA, Tonegawa S. TAPl-dependent peptide translocation in vitro is ATP dependent and peptide selective. Cell. 1993; 74: 577-584.
17. Neefjes JJ, Momburg F, Hammerling GJ. Selective and ATP-dependeut translocation of peptides by the MHC-encoded transporter. Science .1993; 261: 769-771.
18. Van Endert PM, Tampe R, Meyer TH, Tisch R, Bach JF, Mcdevitt HO. A sequential model for peptide binding and transport by the transporters associated with antigen processing. Immunity 1994; 1: 491-500.
19. Gubler B, Daniel S, Armándola EA, Hammer J, Caillat-Zucman S, Van Endert PM. Substrate selection by transporters associated with antigen processing occurs during peptide binding to TAP. Moi Immunol 1998; 35: 427-1133
20. Armandola EA, Momburg F, Nijenhuis M, Bulbuc N, Fruh K, Hammerling GJ. A point mutation in the human transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP2) alters the peptide transport specificity. Eur J Immunol 1996; 26: 1748-1755.
21. Momburg F, Roelse J, Howard JC, Butcher GW, Hammerling GJ, Neefjes JJ. Selectivity of MHC-encoded peptide transporters from human, mouse and rat. Nature 1994; 367: 648-651.
22. Van Endert PM, Riganelli D, Greco G, Fleischhauer K, Sidney J, Sette A, Bach JF. The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing. J Exp Med 1995; 182: 1883-1895.
23. Daniel S, Brusič V, Caillat-Zucman S, Petrovsky N, Harrison L, Riganelli D, Sinigaglia F, Gallazzi F, Hammer J, Van Endert PM. Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. J Immunol 1998; 161: 617-624.
24. Brusic V, Van Endert P, Zeleznikow J, Daniel S, Hammer J, Petrovsky N. A. neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter. In Silico Biol 1999; 1: 109-121.
25. Zhang GL, Petrovsky N, Kwoh CK, August JT, Brusič V. PRED(TAP): a system for prediction of peptide binding to the human transporter associated with antigen processing. Immunome Res 2006; 2: 3.
26. Bhasin M, Raghava G. Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM. Protein Sci 2004; 13: 596-607.
27. Donnes P, Kohlbacher O. Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway. Protein Sci 2005; 14: 2132-2140.
28. Peters B, Bulik S, Tampe R, Van Endert PM, Holzhutter HG. Identifying MHC class I epitopes by predicting the TAP transport efficiency of epitope precursors. J Immunol 2003; 171: 1741-1749.
29. Doytchinova I, Hemsley S, Flower DR. Transporter associated, with antigen processing preselection of peptides binding to the MHC: a bioinformatic evaluation, J Immunol 2004; 173: 6813-6819.
30. Doytchinova IA, Blythe MJ, Flower DR. Additive method for the prediction of protein-peptide binding affinity. Application to the MHC class I molecule HLA-A*0201. J Proteome Res 2002; 1: 263-272.
31. Toseland CP, Clayton DJ, Mcsparron H, Hemslev SL, Blythe MJ, Paine K, Doytchinova IA, Guan P, Hattotuwagama CK, Flower DR. Antijen: a quantitative immunology database integrating functional, thermodynamic, kinetic, biophysical, and cellular data. Immunome Res 2005; 1: 4.
32. Neuwaid AF, Liu JS, Lawrence CE. Gibbs motif sampling detection of bacterial outer membrane protein, repeats. Protein Sci 1995; 4: 1618-1632.
33. Sathiamurthy M, Peters B, Bui HH, Sidney J, Mokili J, Wilson SS, Fieri W, Mcguinness DL, Bourne PE, Sette A. An ontology for immune epitopes: Application to the design of a broad scope database of immune reactivities. Immunome Res 2005; 1: 2.
34. Reche PA, Zhang H, Glutting JR Reinherz EL. EPIMHC: a curated database of MHC-binding peptides for customized computational vaccinology. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2140-2141.
35. Frank E, Hall M, Trigg L, Holmes G, Witten IH. Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 2479-2481.
36. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B. A Tutorial on support vector regression. NC2-TR-1998-2030 NTRS. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1998.
37. Shevade SK, Keerthi SS, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK. Improvements to SMO Algorithm for SVM Regression, Technical Report CD-99-116, 2000.
38. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution, matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 1992; 89: 10915-10919.
39. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European, molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 2000; 16: 276-277.
40. Meng X-L, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. Comparing correlated, correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 1992; 111: 172-175.
41. Yang ZR. Biological applications of support vector machines. Brief Bioinform 2004; 5: 328-338.
42. Bhasin M, Reinherz EL, Reche PA. Recognition and classification of histones using support vector machine. J Comput Biol 2006; 13: 102-112.
43. Bhasin M, Zhang H, Reinherz EL, Reche PA. Prediction of methylated CpGs in DNA sequences using a support vector machine. FEBS Lett 2005; 579: 4302-4308.
44. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical, learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995.