In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 736-742

  von Knobelsdorff Brenkenhoff, Florian ^a   Dieringer, Matthias A ^a   Greiser, Andreas ^b   Schulz Menger, Jeanette ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blood flow velocity; Heart valve prosthesis; Heart valves; Hemodynamics; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GLYCEROL; WATER;

AORTA ROOT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; ORIFICE AREA PLANIMETRY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; STEADY STATE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AORTA; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PULSATILE FLOW; STENTS;

EID: 80051575159     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: 1873734X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.040     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rahimtoola S.H. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults. An update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:2413-2426.
2. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F., Rudolph A., Wassmuth R., Bohl S., Buschmann E.E., Abdel-Aty H., Dietz R., Schulz-Menger J. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:397-404.
3. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F., Rudolph A., Wassmuth R., Schulz-Menger J. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010, 12:36.
4. Frydrychowicz A., Berger A., Russe M.F., Stalder A.F., Harloff A., Dittrich S., Hennig J., Langer M., Markl M. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008, 136:400-407.
5. Markl M., Geiger J., Kilner P.J., Foll D., Stiller B., Beyersdorf F., Arnold R., Frydrychowicz A. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of cardiovascular flow paths in volunteers and patients with Fontan circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011, 39:206-212.
6. Eichinger W., Dabritz S., Lange R. Update of the European standards for inactive surgical implants in the area of heart valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007, 32:690-695.
7. David T.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., Feindel C.M., Cohen G. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 121:268-277.
8. Borger M.A., Nette A.F., Maganti M., Feindel C.M. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2007, 83:2054-2058.
9. Botzenhardt F., Eichinger W.B., Bleiziffer S., Guenzinger R., Wagner I.M., Bauernschmitt R., Lange R. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:2054-2060.
10. Botzenhardt F., Gansera B., Kemkes B.M. Mid-term hemodynamic and clinical results of the stented porcine medtronic mosaic valve in aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 52:34-41.
11. Bottio T., Tarzia V., Rizzoli G., Gerosa G. The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008, 7:750-754.
12. Bottio T., Rizzoli G., Thiene G., Nesseris G., Casarotto D., Gerosa G. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 127:1616-1623.
13. Dellgren G., David T.E., Raanani E., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002, 124:146-154.
14. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Keithahn A., Guenzinger R., Bleiziffer S., Wagner I., Bauernschmitt R., Lange R. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005, 129:1056-1063.
15. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I.M., Ruzicka D., Badiu C.C., Guenzinger R., Bauernschmitt R., Lange R. Hemodynamic characterization of the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis at rest and exercise. J Heart Valve Dis 2009, 18:95-100.
16. Jamieson W.R., Forgie W.R., Hayden R.I., Langlois Y., Ling H., Stanford E.A., Roberts K.A., Dolman W.B. Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis-optimizing management for the small aortic annulus. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010, 58:69-75.
17. Zoghbi W.A., Chambers J.B., Dumesnil J.G., Foster E., Gottdiener J.S., Grayburn P.A., Khandheria B.K., Levine R.A., Marx G.R., Miller F.A., Nakatani S., Quinones M.A., Rakowski H., Rodriguez L.L., Swaminathan M., Waggoner A.D., Weissman N.J., Zabalgoitia M. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22:975-1014.
18. Rosenhek R., Binder T., Maurer G., Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16:1116-1127.
19. Brown J.M., O'Brien S.M., Wu C., Sikora J.A., Griffith B.P., Gammie J.S. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:82-90.
20. Gerosa G., Tarzia V., Rizzoli G., Bottio T. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 131:1058-1064.
21. Bakhtiary F., Dzemali O., Steinseiffer U., Schmitz C., Glasmacher B., Moritz A., Kleine P. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 134:657-662.
22. Strohm O., Schulz-Menger J., Hanlein D., Dietz R., Friedrich M.G. Magnetic resonance planimetry of the vena contracta as a new approach to assessment of stenotic heart valves: an in vitro study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14:31-34.
23. Schlosser T., Malyar N., Jochims M., Breuckmann F., Hunold P., Bruder O., Erbel R., Barkhausen J. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:1284-1290.
24. Kvitting J.P., Dyverfeldt P., Sigfridsson A., Franzen S., Wigstrom L., Bolger A.F., Ebbers T. In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 31:1075-1080.
25. Dyverfeldt P., Kvitting J.P., Sigfridsson A., Engvall J., Bolger A.F., Ebbers T. Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: in vivo feasibility of generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28:655-663.