Hemodynamic characterization of the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis at rest and exercise

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 95-100

  Bleiziffer, Sabine ^a   Eichinger, Walter B ^a   Hettich, Ina M ^a   Ruzicka, Daniel ^a   Badiu, Catalin C ^a   Guenzinger, Ralf ^a   Bauernschmitt, Robert ^a   Lange, Ruediger ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 65349123559     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Minami K, Zittermann A, Schulte-Eistrup S, Koertke H, Korfer R. Mitroflow synergy prostheses for aortic valve replacement: 19 years' experience with 1, 516 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1699-1705 (Pubitemid 41464286)
2. Yankah CA, Schubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1, 037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:172-179; discussion 179-180 (Pubitemid 47046893)
3. Thulin LI, Thilen UJ, Kymle KA. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Low incidence of structural valve deterioration in elderly patients during an 11-year follow-up. Scand Cardiovasc J 2000;34:192-196
4. Pomar JL, Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Castella M, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to ten years. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S305-S309; discussion S309-S310
5. Richards KL. Assessment of aortic and pulmonic stenosis by echocardiography. Circulation 1991;84:I182-I187
6. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863-871
7. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Hettich I, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Heart 2008;94:637-641 (Pubitemid 351580141)
8. Minami K, Boethig D, Mirow N, et al. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: An analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:112-122 (Pubitemid 30101804)
9. Pomar JL, Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Castella M, Germann E, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement > or =60 years of age. Arm Thorac Surg 1998;66:S53-S56 (Pubitemid 29087130)
10. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Hettich I, et al. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: Which is the best method? Heart 2007;93:615-620 (Pubitemid 46707117)
11. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Guenzinger R, et al. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: A better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:382-388; discussion 388-389
12. Garcia-Bengochea J, Sierra J, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:446-451; discussion 451-452
13. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-988 (Pubitemid 37048229)
14. Eichinger W, Dabritz S, Lange R. Update of the European standards for inactive surgical implants in the area of heart valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:690-695 (Pubitemid 47513535)
15. Houel R, Le Besnerais P, Soustelle C, Kirsch M, Hillion ML, Loisance D. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:368-374; discussion 374-375
16. Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, et al. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1234-1241 (Pubitemid 46635492)
17. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Garcia-Acuna JM, et al. The influence of the design on the medium to long-term hemodynamic behavior of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5(Suppl.3):S317- S323 (Pubitemid 26393625)
18. Franzen SF, Nylander E, Olin CL. Aortic valve replacement with pericardial valves in patients with small aortic roots. Clinical results in a consecutive series of patients receiving 19 and 21 mm prostheses. Scand Cardiovasc J 2001;35:114-118 (Pubitemid 32447725)
19. Jennings LM, El-Gatit A, Nagy ZL, Fisher J, Walker PG, Watterson KG. Hydrodynamic function of the second-generation Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:63-68 (Pubitemid 34734647)
20. Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T. Small aortic annulus: The hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1058-1064