Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 397-404

  Von Knobelsdorff Brenkenhoff, Florian ^a   Rudolph, André ^a   Wassmuth, Ralf ^a   Bohl, Steffen ^a   Buschmann, Eva Elina ^a   Abdel Aty, Hassan ^a   Dietz, Rainer ^a   Schulz Menger, Jeanette ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Imaging; MRI; Surgery; Valves

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROLAPSE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; AORTIC VALVE REPAIR; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BREATH HOLDING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; STENT; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; BIOPROSTHESIS; EVALUATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70350494909     PISSN: 19419651     EISSN: 19420080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.840967     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baumgartner H, Khan SS, DeRobertis M, Czer LS, Maurer G. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area: an in vitro study. Circulation. 1992;85:2275-2283.
2. Rothbart RM, Castriz JL, Harding LV, Russo CD, Teague SM. Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:817-824.
3. Brasch AV, Luo H, Khan SS. Effect of harmonic imaging for planimetry on transthoracic echocardiography on visualization of the aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:1047-1049.
4. Kim CJ, Berglund H, Nishioka T, Luo H, Siegel RJ. Correspondence of aortic valve area determination from transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J. 1996;132:1163-1172.
5. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, Pilz B, Uhlich F, Dietz R. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J. 2002;144:329-334.
6. John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, Rau M, Ricken W, Bachmann G, Hamm CW. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:519-526.
7. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, Watkins MP, Williams TA, Lehr KA, Wickline SA. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation. 2003;108:2236-2243.
8. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, Gillam LD, Hodgson JM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM, Lesser JR, Martin ET, Messer JV, Redberg RF, Rubin GD, Rumsfeld JS, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG, Woodard PK, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Patel MR; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475-1497.
9. Matsue H, Sawa Y, Matsumiya G, Matsuda H, Hamada S. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005;14:630-636.
10. De Arenaza DP, Lees B, Flather M, Nugara F, Husebye T, Jasinski M, Cisowski M, Khan M, Henein M, Gaer J, Guvendik L, Bochenek A, Wos S, Lie M, Van Nooten G, Pennell D, Pepper J; on behalf of the ASSER (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) investigators. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation. 2005;112:2696-2702.
11. Dill T. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Heart. 2008; 94:943-948.
12. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:1-25.
13. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Strohm O, Dick AJ, Dietz R. The diagnostic impact of 2D- versus 3D-left ventricular volumetry by MRI in patients with suspected heart failure. MAGMA. 2000;11:16-19.
14. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS; 2006 Writing Committee Members; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008; 118:e523-e661.
15. Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, Weissman NJ, Brindis RG, Patel MR, Khandheria B, Alpert JS, Fitzgerald D, Heidenreich P, Martin ET, Messer JV, Miller AB, Picard MH, Raggi P, Reed KD, Rumsfeld JS, Steimle AE, Tonkovic R, Vijayaraghavan K, Weissman NJ, Yeon SB, Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Patel MR, Peterson E, Wolk MJ, Allen JM; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American Society of Echocardiography; American College of Emergency Physicians; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American College of Chest Physicians; Society of Critical Care Medicine. ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50: 187-204.
16. Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, Sharples L, Rose F, Coulden R, Lee E, Dunning J, Argano V, Tsui S. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2006;114: I535-I540.
17. Walther T, Lehmann S, Falk V, Metz S, Doll N, Rastan A, Viehweg M, Richter M, Gummert J, Mohr FW. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stented xenograft hemodynamic function in the aortic position. Circulation. 2004;110:II74-II78.
18. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Guenzinger R, Wagner IM, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff et al MRI of Aortic Bioprostheses 403 by Gerrit Jan KRAMER on January 11, 2010circimaging.ahajournals.orgDownloaded from for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2054-2060.
19. Griffith MJ, Carey C, Coltart DJ, Jenkins BS, Webb-Peploe MM. Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade the severity of aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1989;62:372-378.
20. Rahimtoola S. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20-24.
21. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108:983-988.
22. Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 2006;114:I553-I558.
23. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:1116-1127.
24. Dittrich HC, McCann HA, Walsh TP, Blanchard DG, Oppenheim GE, Waack TC, Donaghey LB, Wheeler K. Transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of prosthetic and native aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:758-761.
25. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, Magnin D, Anguenot T, Schiele F, Bassand JP. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart. 1997;78:68-73.
26. Poh KK, Levine RA, Solis J, Shen L, Flaherty M, Kang YJ, Guerrero JL, Hung J. Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2526-2535.
27. Goland S, Trento A, Iida K, Czer LS, De Robertis M, Naqvi TZ, Tolstrup K, Akima T, Luo H, Siegel RJ. Assessment of aortic stenosis by threedimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach. Heart. 2007;93:801-807.
28. Friedrich M, Schulz-Menger J, Dietz R. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2148.
29. Hildebrand LB, Buonocore MH. Fully refocused gradient recalled echo (FRGRE): factors affecting flow and motion sensitivity in cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;4:211-222.
30. Schlosser T, Malyar N, Jochims M, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, Bruder O, Erbel R, Barkhausen J. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRIcomparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1284-1290.
31. Pouleur AC, Le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JLJ, Gerber BL. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology. 2007;244:745-754.
32. Grunkemeier GL, Bodnar E. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:49-55.
33. Cohn LH, Collins JJ Jr, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, Couper GS, Aranki SF. Twenty-year follow-up of the Hancock modified orifice porcine aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:30-34.