Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Von Knobelsdorff Brenkenhoff, Florian ^a   Rudolph, André ^a   Wassmuth, Ralf ^a   Schulz Menger, Jeanette ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINUS RHYTHM; STEADY STATE; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY;

BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 77956159121     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-36     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. Zoghbi WA Chambers JB Dumesnil JG Foster E, Gottdiener JS Grayburn PA, Khandheria BK Levine RA, Marx GR Miller FA Jr, Nakatani S Quĩones MA, Rakowski H Rodriguez LL, Swaminathan M Waggoner AD, Weissman NJ Zabalgoitia M, American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; Task Force on Prosthetic Valves; American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee; Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography; European Society of Cardiology; Japanese Society of Echocardiography; Canadian Society of Echocardiography; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography; European Society of Cardiology; Japanese Society of Echocardiography; Canadian Society of Echocardiography,, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 975 1014 quiz 1082-1014 10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.013 19733789
2. Echocardiographic follow-up after heart valve replacement. Pflederer T Flachskampf FA, Heart (British Cardiac Society) 96 75 85 20019213
3. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F Rudolph A, Wassmuth R Bohl S, Buschmann EE Abdel-Aty H, Dietz R Schulz-Menger J, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 397 404 392 p following 404 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.840967 19808628
4. Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Djavidani B Debl K, Lenhart M Seitz J, Paetzel C Schmid FX, Nitz WR Feuerbach S, Riegger G Luchner A, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2005 45 2048 2053 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.036 15963408
5. Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. Lin SJ Brown PA Watkins MP Williams TA, Lehr KA Liu W, Lanza GM Wickline SA, Caruthers SD,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004 44 133 137 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.038 15234421
6. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Dill T, Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2008 94 943 948 18552230
7. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Baumgartner H Hung J, Bermejo J Chambers JB, Evangelista A Griffin BP, Iung B Otto CM, Pellikka PA Quinones M, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 1 23 quiz 101-102 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029 19130998
8. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Hatle L Angelsen B Tromsdal A,, Circulation 1979 60 1096 1104 487543
9. Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices. Faletra F Pezzano A Jr Fusco R Mantero A, Corno R Crivellaro W, De Chiara F Vitali E, Gordini V Magnani P, Pezzano A Sr,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1996 28 1190 1197 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00326-9 8890815
10. -2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Bonow RO Carabello BA Chatterjee K de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP Freed MD, Gaasch WH Lytle BW, Nishimura RA O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA Otto CM, Shah PM Shanewise JS, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008 52 1 142 10.1016/j.jacc.2008. 05.007 18848134
11. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Fuster V Rydén LE Cannom DS Crijns HJ, Curtis AB Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL Le Heuzey JY, Kay GN Lowe JE, Olsson SB Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL Wann S, Smith SC Jr Jacobs AK, Adams CD Anderson JL, Antman EM Halperin JL, Hunt SA Nishimura R, Ornato JP Page RL, Riegel B Priori SG, Blanc JJ Budaj A, Camm AJ Dean V, Deckers JW Despres C, Dickstein K Lekakis J, McGregor K Metra M, Morais J Osterspey A, Tamargo JL Zamorano JL, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society,, Circulation 2006 114 257 354 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.177292 16908781
12. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. Friedrich M Schulz-Menger J Dietz R,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004 43 2148 author reply 2148-2149 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.010 15172429
13. Fully refocused gradient recalled echo (FRGRE): factors affecting flow and motion sensitivity in cardiac MRI. Hildebrand LB Buonocore MH, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002 4 211 222 10.1081/JCMR-120003947 12074136
14. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences. Schlosser T Malyar N, Jochims M Breuckmann F, Hunold P Bruder O, Erbel R Barkhausen J, European radiology 2007 17 1284 1290 10.1007/s00330-006-0437-5 17043736
15. Variability between methods of calculating mitral valve area: simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization studies conducted before and after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Klarich KW Rihal CS Nishimura RA,, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996 9 684 690 10.1016/S0894-7317(96) 90065-6 8887872
16. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method? Bleiziffer S Eichinger WB Hettich I Guenzinger R, Ruzicka D Bauernschmitt R, Lange R,, Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2007 93 615 620 17164480
17. Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Binder TM Rosenhek R Porenta G Maurer G, Baumgartner H,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000 36 1355 1361 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00852-4 11028494
18. Evaluation of mitral stenosis in 2008. Messika-Zeitoun D Iung B Brochet E Himbert D, Serfaty JM Laissy JP, Vahanian A,, Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2008 101 653 663 10.1016/j.acvd.2008.06.016 19056072
19. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation: an accurate and novel approach. Zamorano J Cordeiro P, Sugeng L Perez de Isla L, Weinert L Macaya C, Rodriguez E Lang RM, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004 43 2091 2096 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.046 15172418
20. Which method should be the reference method to evaluate the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis? Gorlin's method versus 3D-echo. Perez de Isla L Casanova C Almeria C Rodrigo JL, Cordeiro P Mataix L, Aubele AL Lang R, Zamorano JL,, Eur J Echocardiogr 2007 8 470 473 10.1016/j.euje.2006.08.008 17046330
21. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Nakatani S Masuyama T, Kodama K Kitabatake A, Fujii K Kamada T, Circulation 1988 77 78 85 3335074
22. Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. Dumesnil JG Honos GN, Lemieux M Beauchemin J, The American journal of cardiology 1990 65 1443 1448 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91352-7 2353649
23. Impact of cardiac rhythm on mitral valve area calculated by the pressure half time method in patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis. Kim HK Kim YJ Chang SA Kim DH, Sohn DW Oh BH, Park YB,, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 42 47 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.007 19131001
24. MRI planimetry for diagnosis and follow-up of valve area in mitral stenosis treated with valvuloplasty. Djavidani B Debl K, Buchner S Lipke C, Nitz W Feuerbach S, Riegger G Luchner A, Rofo 2006 178 781 786 16862504
25. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. Messika-Zeitoun D Serfaty JM Laissy JP Berhili M, Brochet E Iung B, Vahanian A,, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2006 48 411 413 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.035 16843196
26. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach. Goland S Trento A, Iida K Czer LS, De Robertis M Naqvi TZ, Tolstrup K Akima T, Luo H Siegel RJ, Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2007 93 801 807 17488766
27. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement. Magne J Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG Tanne D, Dagenais F Doyle D, Pibarot P, Circulation 2007 115 1417 1425 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631549 17339554