Comparison of whole body MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 Tesla in patients with hereditary hyperlipidemia

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 547-553

  Bannas, Peter ^a   Finck Wedel, Anna Katharina ^a   Buhk, Jan Hendrik ^a   Bley, Thorsten Alexander ^a   Koops, Andreas ^a   Kooijman, Hendrik ^b   Beil, Frank Ulrich ^a   Adam, Gerhard ^a   Weber, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

1.5 Tesla; 3 Tesla; Hereditary hyperlipidemia; MRI; Whole body MR angiography

Indexed keywords

1.5 TESLA; 3 TESLA; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CHI-SQUARE TESTS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DETECTABILITY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES; DIAGNOSTIC QUALITY; FIELD STRENGTHS; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; MR ANGIOGRAPHY; STENOSES; TARGET VESSELS; WHOLE BODY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STATISTICAL TESTS;

IMAGE QUALITY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; HYPERLIPIDEMIAS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 80051571312     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100404     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Fouchier SW, Rodenburg J, Defesche JC, et al. Management of hereditary dyslipidaemia; the paradigm of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:1247-53
2. Viles-Gonzalez JF, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Atherothrombosis: A widespread disease with unpredictable and life-threatening consequences. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1197-207
3. Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21-8
4. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-92
5. Herborn CU. Peripheral contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with 1.0 M gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 2004;14(Suppl. 5):M23-5
6. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K, et al. Total-body 3D magnetic resonance angiography influences the management of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 2006;16:685-91
7. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 2001;357:1086-91
8. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K, et al. Detection of atherosclerosis: Systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography - initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:277-82
9. Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Eriksson MO, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients using a standard clinical scanner. Eur Radiol 2006;16:147-53
10. Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Logager VB, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla using a hybrid protocol in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:877-86
11. Fenchel M, Nael K, Seeger A, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1473-83
12. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, et al. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 2001;36:283-91
13. Hansen T, Ahlstrom H, Wikstrom J, et al. A total atherosclerotic score for whole-body MRA and its relation to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1174-80
14. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, et al. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 2008;28:1983-98
15. Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M, et al. [Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI]. Radiologe 2004;44:49-55
16. Brennan DD, Johnston C, O'Brien J, et al. Contrast-enhanced bolus-chased whole-body MR angiography using a moving tabletop and quadrature body coil acquisition. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:750-5
17. Diehm N, Kickuth R, Baumgartner I, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: Prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2007;42:467-76
18. Huegli RW, Aschwanden M, Bongartz G, et al. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison. Radiology 2006;239:901-8