Contrast-enhanced bolus-chased whole-body MR angiography using a moving tabletop and quadrature body coil acquisition

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 750-755

  Brennan, Darren D ^a   Johnston, Ciaran ^a   O'Brien, Julie ^a   Taylor, David H ^a   Cronin, Carmel ^a   Eustace, Stephen J ^a  

^a CAPPAGH NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM DO3A BUTRIOL; GADOLINIUM-DO3A-BUTRIOL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHOLE BODY RADIATION; ADULT; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 27744501954     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850750     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, et al. A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR 1997; 169:1655-1661
2. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K, Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Detection of atherosclerosis: systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography-initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227:277-282
3. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:877-881
4. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR angiography for assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40:835-846
5. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. Using a 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for total-body three-dimensional MR angiography: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17:565-571.
6. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR-angiography: the role of contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 2000; 34:247-256
7. Balzer JO, Loewe C, Davis K, et al. Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:2067-2074
8. Goyen M, Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Debatin JF, Bosk S, Ruehm SG. 0.5 M Gd chelate (Magnevist) versus 1.0 M Gd chelate (Gadovist): dose-independent effect on image quality of pelvic three-dimensional MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:602-607