![]() |
Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 21-28
|
Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION;
CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY;
COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY;
DOPPLER FLOWMETER;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
OUTCOMES RESEARCH;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CAROTID STENOSIS;
CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY;
ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;
|
EID: 0036293923
PISSN: 00223050
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.1.21 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (119)
|
References (15)
|