Enhanced bone-integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanopolymorphic titanium in micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 30, 2011, Pages 7297-7308

  Ueno, Takeshi ^a   Tsukimura, Naoki ^a   Yamada, Masahiro ^a   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental and orthopedic implant; Nanotechnology; Nanotuft; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

BONE AREA; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; CRITICAL PARAMETER; HEALING TIME; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; HYBRID SURFACE; IMPLANT FIXATION; IMPLANT SURFACE; MACHINED SURFACE; MICRO-NANO; MICRO-ROUGHNESS; MICROFEATURES; NANOFEATURES; NANOTUFT; NODULAR STRUCTURES; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOCONDUCTIVITY; RAT MODEL; SOFT TISSUE; TITANIUM SURFACES;

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; INTEGRATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; TISSUE; TITANIUM;

BONE;

ALKALI; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CONDUCTION; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTURE HEALING; HEAT TREATMENT; IMPLANT; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NANOANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SOFT TISSUE;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; FEMUR; HOT TEMPERATURE; MALE; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

RATTUS;

EID: 80051551945     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.033     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Chun Y.W., Webster T.J. The role of nanomedicine in growing tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37:2034-2047.
2. Stevens M.M., George J.H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005, 310:1135-1138.
3. Curtis A., Wilkinson C. Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 2001, 19:97-101.
4. Vogel V., Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:265-275.
5. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Curtis A.S., Oreffo R.O. Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2007, 2:129-138.
6. Nuffer J.H., Siegel R.W. Nanostructure-biomolecule interactions: implications for tissue regeneration and nanomedicine. Tissue Eng Part A 2010, 16:423-430.
7. Debbage P. Targeted drugs and nanomedicine: present and future. Curr Pharm Des 2009, 15:153-172.
8. Ikkala O., ten Brinke G. Hierarchical self-assembly in polymeric complexes: towards functional materials. Chem Commun (Camb) 2004, 2131-2137.
9. Martins A., Chung S., Pedro A.J., Sousa R.A., Marques A.P., Reis R.L., et al. Hierarchical starch-based fibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2009, 3:37-42.
10. Soler-Illia G.J., Sanchez C., Lebeau B., Patarin J. Chemical strategies to design textured materials: from microporous and mesoporous oxides to nanonetworks and hierarchical structures. Chem Rev 2002, 102:4093-4138.
11. Variola F., Yi J.H., Richert L., Wuest J.D., Rosei F., Nanci A. Tailoring the surface properties of Ti6Al4V by controlled chemical oxidation. Biomaterials 2008, 29:1285-1298.
12. Seunarine K., Curtis A., Meredith D., Wilkinson C., Riehle M., Gadegaard N. A hierarchical response of cells to perpendicular micro- and nanometric textural cues. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2009, 8:219-225.
13. Spatz J.P. Nano- and micropatterning by organic-inorganic templating of hierarchical self-assembled structures. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002, 41:3359-3362.
14. Zhang EW, Wang YB, Shuai KG, Gao F, Bai YJ, Cheng Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SLA titanium surfaces with further alkali or hydrogen peroxide and heat treatment. Biomed Mater 6(2):025001. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
15. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25:63-74.
16. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20(Suppl. 4):172-184.
17. Mendonca G., Mendonca D.B., Aragao F.J., Cooper L.F. Advancing dental implant surface technology - from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3822-3835.
18. Sato M., Webster T.J. Nanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications. Expert Rev Med Dev 2004, 1:105-114.
19. Cooper L.F., Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., Felton D.A. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998, 13:163-174.
20. Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., Felton D.A., Cooper L.F. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998, 13:17-29.
21. Guo J., Padilla R.J., Ambrose W., De Kok I.J., Cooper L.F. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5418-5425.
22. Khang D., Lu J., Yao C., Haberstroh K.M., Webster T.J. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29:970-983.
23. Kubo K., Tsukimura N., Iwasa F., Ueno T., Saruwatari L., Aita H., et al. Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5319-5329.
24. Tsukimura N., Yamada M., Iwasa F., Minamikawa H., Att W., Ueno T., et al. Synergistic effects of UV photofunctionalization and micro-nano hybrid topography on the biological properties of titanium. Biomaterials 2011, 32:4358-4368.
25. Sanchez C., Arribart H., Guille M.M. Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems. Nat Mater 2005, 4:277-288.
26. Ogawa T., Saruwatari L., Takeuchi K., Aita H., Ohno N. Ti nano-nodular structuring for bone integration and regeneration. J Dent Res 2008, 87:751-756.
27. Nishimura I., Huang Y., Butz F., Ogawa T., Lin A., Wang C.J. Discrete deposition of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on a titanium implant with predisposing substrate microtopography accelerated osseointegration. Nanotechnology 2007, 18.
28. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004, 19:659-666.
29. Kim H.M., Miyaji F., Kokubo T., Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1996, 32:409-417.
30. Nishio K., Neo M., Akiyama H., Nishiguchi S., Kim H.M., Kokubo T., et al. The effect of alkali- and heat-treated titanium and apatite-formed titanium on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 52:652-661.
31. Nishiguchi S., Nakamura T., Kobayashi M., Kim H.M., Miyaji F., Kokubo T. The effect of heat treatment on bone-bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium. Biomaterials 1999, 20:491-500.
32. Ogawa T., Ozawa S., Shih J.H., Ryu K.H., Sukotjo C., Yang J.M., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000, 79:1857-1863.
33. Ueno T., Yamada M., Suzuki T., Minamikawa H., Sato N., Hori N., et al. Enhancement of bone-titanium integration profile with UV-photofunctionalized titanium in a gap healing model. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1546-1557.
34. Aita H., Hori N., Takeuchi M., Suzuki T., Yamada M., Anpo M., et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1015-1025.
35. Ogawa T., Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:200-210.
36. Takeuchi K., Saruwatari L., Nakamura H.K., Yang J.M., Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 72A:296-305.
37. Saruwatari L., Aita H., Butz F., Nakamura H.K., Ouyang J., Yang Y., et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro- and ultrastructure. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:2002-2016.
38. Butz F., Ogawa T., Chang T.L., Nishimura I. Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006, 21:687-695.
39. Ogawa T., Nishimura I. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res 2006, 85:566-570.
40. Ogawa T., Sukotjo C., Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002, 11:241-247.
41. Weinlaender M., Kenney E.B., Lekovic V., Beumer J., Moy P.K., Lewis S. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992, 7:491-496.
42. Butz F., Aita H., Wang C.J., Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006, 85:560-565.
43. Butz F., Aita H., Takeuchi K., Ogawa T. Enhanced mineralized tissue adhesion to titanium over polystyrene assessed by the nano-scratch test. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 74:164-170.
44. Nakamura H., Shim J., Butz F., Aita H., Gupta V., Ogawa T. Glycosaminoglycan degradation reduces mineralized tissue-titanium interfacial strength. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 77:478-486.
45. Nakamura H.K., Butz F., Saruwatari L., Ogawa T. A role for proteoglycans in mineralized tissue-titanium adhesion. J Dent Res 2007, 86:147-152.
46. Cooper L.F., Zhou Y., Takebe J., Guo J., Abron A., Holmen A., et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006, 27:926-936.
47. Tsukimura N., Kojima N., Kubo K., Att W., Takeuchi K., Kameyama Y., et al. The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 84:108-116.