Discrete deposition of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on a titanium implant with predisposing substrate microtopography accelerated osseointegration

Nanotechnology

Volumn 18, Issue 24, 2007, Pages

  Nishimura, Ichiro ^a   Huang, Yuhong ^b   Butz, Frank ^a   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a   Lin, Audrey ^a   Wang, Chiachien Jake ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Chemat Technology Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPOSITION; HYDROXYAPATITE; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOPOGRAPHY;

DISCRETE DEPOSITION; MICROTOPOGRAPHY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

NANOPARTICLES;

3 AMINOPROPYLTRIETHOXYSILANE; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HEALING; IMPLANT; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 34249702381     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/24/245101     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Stevens M M and George J H 2005 Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface Science 310 1135-8
2. Tasker L H, Sparey-Taylor G J and Nokes L D 2007 Applications of nanotechnology in orthopaedics Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 456 243-9
3. Palin E, Liu H and Webster T J 2005 Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation Nanotechnology 16 1828-35
4. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T and Yamamuro T 1990 Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24 721-34
5. Filgueiras M R, La Torre G and Hench L L 1993 Solution effects on the surface reactions of a bioactive glass J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 445-53
6. Chou Y F, Chiou W A, Xu Y, Dunn J C and Wu B M 2004 The effect of pH on the structural evolution of accelerated biomimetic apatite Biomaterials 25 5323-31
7. Oh S H, Finones R R, Daraio C, Chen L H and Jin S 2005 Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes Biomaterials 26 4938-43
8. Matsuoka H, Akiyama H, Okada Y, Ito H, Shigeno C, Konishi J, Kokubo T and Nakamura T 1999 In vitro analysis of the stimulation of bone formation by highly bioactive apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic: released calcium ions promote osteogenic differentiation in osteoblastic ROS17/2.8 cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47 176-88
9. Chou Y F, Huang W, Dunn J C, Miller T A and Wu B M 2005 The effect of biomimetic apatite structure on osteoblast viability, proliferation, and gene expression Biomaterials 26 285-95
10. Price R L, Waid M C, Haberstroh K M and Webster T J 2003 Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibres Biomaterials 24 1877-87
11. Price R L, Ellison K, Haberstroh K M and Webster T J 2004 Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofibre compacts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 70 129-38
12. Webster T J, Ergun C, Doremus R H, Siegel R W and Bizios R 2000 Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 475-83
13. Webster T J, Siegel R W and Bizios R 1999 Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics Biomaterials 20 1221-7
14. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh K M and Webster T J 2002 Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion Tissue Eng. 8 753-61
15. Webster T J, Ergun C, Doremus R H, Siegel R W and Bizios R 2001 Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics Biomaterials 22 1327-33
16. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih J H, Ryu K H, Sukotjo C, Yang J M and Nishimura I 2000 Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats J. Dent. Res. 79 1857-63
17. Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang T L and Nishimura I 2006 Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 21 687-95
18. Castano H, O'Rear E A, McFetridge P S and Sikavitsas V I 2004 Polypyrrole thin films formed by admicellar polymerization support the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells Macromol. Biosci. 4 785-94
19. Dalby M J, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson C D and Oreffo R O 2006 Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths Biomaterials 27 1306-15
20. Ozawa S, Ogawa T, Iida K, Sukotjo C, Hasegawa H, Nishimura R D and Nishimura I 2002 Ovariectomy hinders the early stage of bone-implant integration: histomorphometric, biomechanical, and molecular analyses Bone 30 137-43
21. Blind O, Klein L H, Dailey B and Jordan L 2005 Characterization of hydroxyapatite films obtained by pulsed-laser deposition on Ti and Ti-6AL-4v substrates Dent. Mater. 21 1017-24
22. Peraire C, Arias J L, Bernal D, Pou J, Leon B, Arano A and Roth W 2006 Biological stability and osteoconductivity in rabbit tibia of pulsed laser deposited hydroxylapatite coatings J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 77 370-9
23. Richard D, Dumelie N, Benhayoune H, Bouthors S, Guillaume C, Lalun N, Balossier G and Laurent-Maquin D 2006 Behavior of human osteoblast-like cells in contact with electrodeposited calcium phosphate coatings J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 79 108-15
24. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L and Li N 2006 Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel Science 311 622-7
25. 2 particles Powder Technol. 123 194-8
26. Gosain A K 2005 Biomaterials for reconstruction of the cranial vault Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 116 663-6
27. Kwon B and Jenis L G 2005 Carrier materials for spinal fusion Spine J. 5 224S-30
28. Chang B S, Lee C K, Hong K S, Youn H J, Ryu H S, Chung S S and Park K W 2000 Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations Biomaterials 21 1291-8
29. Hing K A, Best S M, Tanner K E, Bonfield W and Revell P A 1999 Quantification of bone ingrowth within bone-derived porous hydroxyapatite implants of varying density J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 10 663-70
30. Simank H G, Stuber M, Frahm R, Helbig L, van Lenthe H and Muller R 2006 The influence of surface coatings of dicalcium phosphate (DCPD) and growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5) on the stability of titanium implants in vivo Biomaterials 27 3988-94
31. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T and Nakamura T 2006 Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants Biomaterials 27 5892-900
32. Ban S, Iwaya Y, Kono H and Sato H 2005 Surface modification of titanium by etching in concentrated sulfuric acid Dent. Mater. 22 1115-20
33. 2 nanoparticles J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 5 759-65
34. Brunette D M 1988 The effects of implant surface topography on the behaviour of cells Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 3 231-46
35. Curtis A and Wilkinson C 1997 Topographical control of cells Biomaterials 18 1573-83
36. Matsuzaka K, Walboomers F, de Ruijter A and Jansen J A 2000 Effect of microgrooved poly-l-lactic (PLA) surfaces on proliferation, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralized matrix formation of rat bone marrow cells Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 11 325-33
37. Teixeira A I, Abrams G A, Bertics P J, Murphy C J and Nealey P F 2003 Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates J. Cell. Sci. 116 1881-92
38. Sawyer A A, Hennessy K M and Bellis S L 2007 The effect of adsorbed serum proteins, RGD and proteoglycan-binding peptides on the adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells to hydroxyapatite Biomaterials 28 383-92
39. Woo K M, Seo J, Zhang R and Ma P X 2007 Suppression of apoptosis by enhanced protein adsorption on polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds Biomaterials 28 2622-30