The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 108-116

  Tsukimura, Naoki ^a   Kojima, Norinaga ^a   Kubo, Katsutoshi ^b   Att, Wael ^a   Takeuchi, Kazuo ^b   Kameyama, Yoichiro ^b   Maeda, Hatsuhiko ^b   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone titanium integration; Chemistry; Osseointegrated implant; Osseointegration; Osteoblast

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BONE; CELL CULTURE; GENE EXPRESSION; OSTEOBLASTS; RATS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

OSSEOINTEGRATION; SPUTTER DEPOSITIONING; SUPERFICIAL CHEMISTRY; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

TITANIUM COMPOUNDS;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOPOGRAPHY;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 36949039214     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31422     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:17-29.
2. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:15-46.
3. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:675-690.
4. Ong JL, Prince CW, Raikar GN, Lucas LC. Effect of surface topography of titanium on surface chemistry and cellular response. Implant Dent 1996;5:83-88.
5. Park BS, Heo SJ, Kim CS, Oh JE, Kim JM, Lee G, Park WH, Chung CP, Min BM. Effects of adhesion molecules on the behavior of osteoblast-like cells and normal human fibroblasts on different titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:640-651.
6. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials 2003;24:4663-4670.
7. Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V, Knowles JC. Sol-gel-modified titanium with hydroxyapatite thin films and effect on osteoblast-like cell responses. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:294-305.
8. Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:18-27.
9. Chosa N, Taira M, Saitoh S, Sato N, Araki Y. Characterization of apatite formed on alkaline-heat-treated Ti. J Dent Res 2004;83:465-469.
10. Li D, Liu B, Han Y, Xu K. Effects of a modified sandblasting surface treatment on topographic and chemical properties of titanium surface. Implant Dent 2001;10:59-64.
11. Mustafa K, Pan J, Wroblewski J, Leygraf C, Arvidson K. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of titanium surfaces cultured with osteoblast-like cells derived from human mandibular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:655-664.
12. Zhu X, Kim K, Ong JL, Jeong Y. Surface analysis of anodic oxide films containing phosphorus on titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:331-336.
13. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Byon E, Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005;26:6720-6730.
14. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Roser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:1025-1031.
15. Saruwatari L, Aita H, Butz F, Nakamura HK, Ouyang J, Yang Y, Chiou WA, Ogawa T. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro- and ultrastructure. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:2002-2016.
16. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Schenk-Meuser K, Linez P, Biehl V, Duschner H, Breme J, Hildebrand H. Interactions between cells and titanium surfaces. Biomol Eng 2002;19:243-249.
17. McAlarney ME, Oshiro MA, McAlarney CV. Effects of titanium dioxide passive film crystal structure, thickness, and crystallinity on C3 adsorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:73-80.
18. Wang G, Cheng XR. Characterizations of three surface-modified titanium oxide films. Chin J Dent Res 2000;3:49-52.
19. Oji MO, Wood JV, Downes S. Effects of surface-treated cpTi and Ti6Al4V alloy on the initial attachment of human osteoblast cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:869-872.
20. MacDonald DE, Rapuano BE, Deo N, Stranick M, Somasundaran P, Boskey AL. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: Effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004;25:3135-3146.
21. Denholm EM, Cauchon E, Poulin C, Silver PJ. Inhibition of human dermal fibroblast proliferation by removal of dermatan sulfate. Eur J Pharmacol 2000;400:145-153.
22. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces. Part 1. Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
23. Oshida Y, Sachdeva R, Miyazaki S. Changes in contact angles as a function of time on some pre-oxidized biomaterials. J Mater Sci 1992;3:306-312.
24. Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:200-210.
25. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:296-305.
26. Nakamura H, Saruwatari L, Aita H, Takeuchi K, Ogawa T. Molecular and biomechanical characterization of mineralized tissue by dental pulp cells on titanium. J Dent Res 2005;84:515-520.
27. Tang ZG, Callaghan JT, Hunt JA. The physical properties and response of osteoblasts to solution cast films of PLGA doped polycaprolactone. Biomaterials 2005;26:6618-6624.
28. Ber S, Torun Kose G, Hasirci V. Bone tissue engineering on patterned collagen films: An in vitro study. Biomaterials 2005;26:1977-1986.
29. Jansen EJ, Sladek RE, Bahar H, Yaffe A, Gijbels MJ, Kuijer R, Bulstra SK, Guldemond NA, Binderman I, Koole LH. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005;26:4423-4431.
30. He B, Wan Y, Bei J, Wang S. Synthesis and cell affinity of functionalized poly(L-lactide-co-β-malic acid) with high molecular weight. Biomaterials 2004;25:5239-5247.
31. Wang YW, Wu Q, Chen GQ. Reduced mouse fibroblast cell growth by increased hydrophilicity of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates via hyaluronan coating. Biomaterials 2003;24:4621-4629.
32. Stein GS, Lian JB. Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/ differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. Endocr Rev 1993;14:424-442.
33. Siddhanti SR, Quarles LD. Molecular to pharmacologic control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Biochem 1994;55:310-320.
34. Alborzi A, Mac K, Glackin CA, Murray SS, Zernik JH. Endochondrial and intramembranous fetal bone development: Osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist, and histone H4. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1996;16:94-106.
35. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone LM, Wilming L, Tassinari MS, Kennedy MB, Pockwinse S, Lian JB, Stein GS. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990;143:420-430.
36. Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002;11:241-247.
37. Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:683-692.
38. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, Vaudaux P, Tonetti M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Simpson JP, Descouts P. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. I. Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:208-216.
39. 2 hybrid coating on Ti implants. J Biomater Appl 2006;20:195-208.
40. Li LH, Kong YM, Kim HW, Kim YW, Kim HE, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials 2004;25:2867-2875.
41. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004;25:4087-4103.