Bayesian approaches to sensory integration for motor control

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 419-428

  Berniker, Max ^a   Kording, Konrad ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961245330     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.125     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Faisal AA, Selen LP, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:292-303.
2. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 2004, 427:244-247.
3. Weiss Y, Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:598-604.
4. Miyazaki M, Nozaki D, Nakajima Y. Testing Bayesian models of human coincidence timing. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:395-399.
5. Miyazaki M, Yamamoto S, Uchida S, Kitazawa S. Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:875-877.
6. Körding KP, Ku SP, Wolpert D. Bayesian Integration in force estimation. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:3161-3165.
7. Knill D, Richards W. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge: University Press; 1996.
8. Chater N, Tenenbaum JB, Yuille A. Probabilistic models of cognition: where next? Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:292-293.
9. Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ. Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91:410-423.
10. Tassinari H, Hudson TE, Landy MS. Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task. J Neurosci 2006, 26:10154-10163.
11. Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH, Heeger DJ. Probability distributions of optical flow. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Mauii, Hawaii: 1991, 310-315.
12. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
13. Alais D, Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 2004, 14:257-262.
14. Maloney LT, Landy MS. A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, Visual Communications and Image Processing IV. Bellingham, WA: Pearlman; 1989, 1154-1163.
15. van Ee R, Adams WJ, Mamassian P. Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception. J Opt Soc Am A 2003, 20:1398-1406.
16. Kersten D, Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003, 13:150-158.
17. Ernst MO, Bulthoff HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:162-169.
18. Geisler WS, Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:508-510.
19. Rosas P, Wagemans J, Ernst MO, Wichmann FA. Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination. J Opt Soc Am A 2005, 22:801-809.
20. Knill DC. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J Vis 2007, 7:1-24.
21. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:1355-1364.
22. Knill DC, Saunders JA. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 2003, 43:2539-2558.
23. Young MJ, Landy MS, Maloney LT. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Res 1993, 33:2685-2696.
24. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS, Banks MS. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. J Vis 2004, 4:967-992.
25. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 2002, 298:1627-1630.
26. Jacobs RA. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 1999, 39:3621-3629.
27. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 1995, 35:389-412.
28. Flanagan JR, Bittner JP, Johansson RS. Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr Biol 2008, 18:1742-1747.
29. Berniker M, Kording K. Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11:1454-1461.
30. Todorov E. Optimal control theory. In: Doya K, ed. Bayesian Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006, 269-298.
31. Stengel RF. Optimal Control and Estimation. New York: Dover Publications; 1994.
32. Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis 2008, 8:1-19.
33. Korenberg AT, Ghahramani Z. A Bayesian view of motor adaptation. Curr Psychol Cogn 2002, 21: 537-564.
34. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.
35. Mehta B, Schaal S. Forward models in visuomotor control. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:942-953.
36. Wallace MT, Roberson GE, Hairston WD, Stein BE, Vaughan JW, Schirillo JA. Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res 2004, 158:252-258.
37. Warren DH, Welch RB, McCarthy TJ. The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses. Percept Psychophys 1981, 30:557-564.
38. Thurlow WR, Jack CE. Certain determinants of the "ventriloquism effect". Percept Mot Skills 1973, 36: 1171-1184.
39. Jack CE, Thurlow WR. Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect. Percept Mot Skills 1973, 37:967-979.
40. Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e943.
41. Sato Y, Toyoizumi T, Aihara K. Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism after effect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli. Neural Comput 2007, 19:3335-3355.
42. Wei K, Kording KP. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 2008, 101: 655-664.
43. Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L. Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. J Vis 2008, 8:1-11.
44. Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11:551-559.
45. Tenenbaum JB, Niyogi S. Learning causal laws. In: 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2003.
46. Steyvers I, Tenenbaum JB, Wagenmakers EJ, Blum B. Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cogn Sci 2003, 27:453-489.
47. Gopnik A, Glymour C, Sobel DM, Schulz LE, Kushnir T, Danks D. A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:3-32.
48. Saxe R, Tenenbaum JB, Carey S. Secret agents: inferences about hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants. Psychol Sci 2005, 16:995-1001.
49. Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB. From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries. Cognition 2006, 103:180-226.
50. Holland P. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 1986, 81:945-960.
51. Pearl J. Causality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
52. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. J Opt Soc Am A 2003, 20:1419-1433.
53. Maloney LT, Trommershäuser J, Landy MS. Questions without words: a comparison between decision making under risk and movement planning under risk. In: Gray W, ed. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006, 297-313.
54. Trommershäuser J, Gepshtein S, Maloney LT, Landy MS, Banks MS. Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability. J Neurosci 2005, 25:7169-7178.
55. Najemnik J, Geisler WS. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 2005, 434:387-391.
56. Najemnik J, Geisler WS. Eye movement statistics in humans are consistent with an optimal search strategy. J Vis 2008, 8:1-14.
57. Najemnik J, Geisler WS. Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search. Vision Res 2009, 49:1286-1294.
58. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101: 9839-9842.
59. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47: 263-291.
60. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends Cogn Sci 2008, 12:291-297.
61. MacKay DJC. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
62. Bishop C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Cambridge, UK: Springer; 2006.
63. Ma WJ, Beck JM, Latham PE, Pouget A. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:1432-1438.
64. Fiser J, Berkes P, Orban G, Lengyel M. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn Sci 2010, 14:119-130.
65. Angelaki DE, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Dickman JD. Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature 2004, 430:560-564.
66. Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 1998, 394:780-784.
67. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:1226-1235.
68. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 1962, 160:106-154.