Testing Bayesian models of human coincidence timing

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 395-399

  Miyazaki, Makoto ^a,b   Nozaki, Daichi ^a   Nakajima, Yasoichi ^a  

^a NATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COINCIDENCE TIMING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 21544441749     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01168.2004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aschersleben G and Prinz W. Synchronization actions with events: the role of sensory information. Percept Psychophys 57: 305-317, 1995.
2. Bayes T. Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 53: 370-418, 1763.
3. Bernardo JM and Smith AFM. Bayesian Theory. New York: Wiley, 1994.
4. α type) in human coordination. Phys Rev Lett 79: 4501-4504, 1997.
5. Delignières D, Lemoine L, and Torre K. Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion. Hum Mov Sci 23: 87-103, 2004.
6. Ding M, Chen Y, and Kelso JAS. Statistical analysis of timing errors. Brain Cogn 48: 98-106, 2002.
7. Dunlap K. Reactions to rhythmic stimuli, with attempts to synchronize. Psychol Rev 17:399-416, 1910.
8. Ehrsson HH, Fagergren A, Jonsson T, Westling G, Johansson RS, and Forssberg H. Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol 83: 528-536, 2000.
9. Gibbon J, Church RM, and Meek WH. Scalar timing in memory. In: Timing and Time Perception, edited by Gibbon J and Allan L. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1984, p. 52-77.
10. Gibbon J, Malapani C, Dale CL, and Gallistel CR. Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 170-184, 1997.
11. Guo K, Nevado A, Robertson RG, Pulgarin M, Thiele A, and Young MP. Effects on orientation perception of manipulating the spatio-temporal prior probability of stimuli. Vision Res 44: 2349-2358, 2004.
12. Haggard P, Clark S, and Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5: 382-385, 2002.
13. Ivry RB and Spencer RMC. The neural representation of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14: 225-232, 2004.
14. Kersten D, Mamassian P, and Knill DC. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception 26: 171-192, 1997.
15. Körding KP, Ku S, and Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in force estimation. J Neurophysiol 92: 3161-3165, 2004.
16. Körding KP and Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
17. Lee DN. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5: 437-459, 1976.
18. Liu Z, Knill DC, and Kersten D. Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vision Res 35: 549-568, 1995.
19. Meek WH and Benson AM. Dissecting the brain's internal clock: how frontal-striatal circuitry keeps time and shifts attention. Brain Cogn 48: 195-211, 2002.
20. Rao RPN. An optimal estimation approach to visual perception and learning. Vision Res 39: 1963-1989, 1999.
21. Rao SM, Mayer AR, and Harrington DL. The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nat Neurosci 4: 317-323, 2001.
22. Ripoll H and Latin I. Effect of expertise on coincident-timing accuracy in a fast ball game. J Sports Sci 15: 573-580, 1997.
23. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985, 2001.
24. Spencer RMC, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J, and Ivry RB. Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science 300: 1437-1439, 2003.
25. Takahashi CD, Scheidt RA, and Reinkensmeyer DJ. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J Neurophysiol 86: 1047-51, 2001.
26. Tresilian JR. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Percept Psychophys 57: 231-245, 1995.
27. van Beers RJ, Baraduc P, and Wolpert DM. Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 357: 1137-1145, 2002.
28. Vorberg D and Wing A. Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In: Handbook of Perception and Action, edited by Heuer H and Keele SW. London: Academic Press, 1996, vol. 2, p. 181-262.
29. Weiss Y, Simoncelli EP, and Adelson EH. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 5: 598-604, 2002.
30. Williams LRT, Katene WH, and Fleming K. Coincidence timing of a tennis stroke: effects of age, skill level, gender, stimulus velocity, and attention demand. Res Q Exerc Sport 73: 28-37, 2002.
31. Wing AM and Kristofferson AB. The timing of interresponse intervals. Percept Psychophys 13: 455-460, 1973.
32. Yamamoto S and Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat Neurosci 4: 759-765, 2001.