People watching: Visual, motor, and social processes in the perception of human movement

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 68-78

  Shiffrar, Maggie ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961238725     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.88     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Plunkett Research Limited. Available at:. (Accessed May 10, 2010).
2. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 1973; 14: 201-211.
3. Johansson G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: an experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychol Res 1976; 38: 379-393.
4. Blake R, Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Ann Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 47-74.
5. Fox R, McDaniels C. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 1982; 218: 486-487.
6. Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 809-813.
7. Pinto J. Developing body representations: a review of infants' responses to biological-motion displays. In: Knoblich G, Grosjean M, Thornton and I, Shiffrar M, eds. Perception of the Human Body from the Inside Out. Oxford University Press; 2006; 305-322.
8. Blake R, Turner L, Smoski M, Pozdol S, Stone W. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with Autism. Psychol Sci 2003; 14: 151-157.
9. Freire A, Lewis TL, Maurer D, Blake R. The development of sensitivity to biological motion in noise. Perception 2006; 35: 647-657.
10. Bertenthal BI, Pinto J. Global processing of biological motions. Psychol Sci 1994; 5: 221-225.
11. Sumi S. Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception 1984; 13: 283-286.
12. Cohen LR. The role of experience in the perception of biological motion, Unpublished dissertation. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; 2002.
13. Giese MA, Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 179-192.
14. Bulthoff I, Bulthoff H, Sinha P. Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 254-257.
15. Jacobs A, Pinto J, Shiffrar M. Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2004; 30: 822-835.
16. Neri P, Morrone C, Burr DC. Seeing biological motion. Nature 1998; 395: 894-896.
17. Thornton I, Pinto J, Shiffrar M. The visual perception of human locomotion. Cogn Neuropsychol 1998; 15: 535-552.
18. Shiffrar M, Freyd JJ. Apparent motion of the human body. Psychol Sci 1990; 1: 257-264.
19. Shiffrar M, Pinto J. In: Prinz W, Hommel B, eds. The Visual Analysis of Bodily Motion. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance, vol. XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002; 381-399.
20. Pinto J, Shiffrar M. The visual perception of human and animal motion in point-light displays. Social Neuro 2009; 4: 332-346.
21. Thornton IM, Rensink RA, Shiffrar M. Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception 2002; 31: 837-853.
22. Thornton IM, Vuong QC. Incidential processing of biological motion. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 1084-1089.
23. Viviani P. Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: a tutorial. In: Prinz W, Hommel B, eds. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance, vol. XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002; 406-442.
24. Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, Knoblich G. Fitts' Law Holds for Action Perception. Psychol Sci 2007; 18: 95-99.
25. Knoblich G, Flach R. Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychol Sci 2001; 12: 467-472.
26. Jacobs A, Shiffrar M. Walking perception by walking observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005; 31: 157-169.
27. Hamilton A, Wolpert D, Frith U. Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 493-498.
28. Kilner J, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ. An interference effect of observed biological motion on action. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 522-525.
29. Kilner J, Hamilton AF, Blakemore SJ. Interference effect of observed human motion on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Social Neuro 2007; 2: 158-166.
30. Casile A, Giese MA. Non-visual motor learning influences the recognition of biological motion. Curr Biol 2006; 16: 69-74.
31. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. Euro J Cogn Psychol 1997; 9: 129-154.
32. Wilson M, Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol Bull 2005; 131: 460-473.
33. Reed CL, McGoldrick JE. Action during body perception: processing time affects self-other correspondences. Social Neuro 2007; 2: 134-149.
34. Wilson M. Perceiving imitatable stimuli: consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychol Bull 2001; 127: 543-553.
35. Loula F, Prasad S, Harber K, Shiffrar M. Recognizing people from their movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005; 31: 210-220.
36. Prasad S, Shiffrar M. Viewpoint and the recognition of people from their movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009; 35: 39-49.
37. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1982.
38. Brothers L. Friday's Footprint: How Society Shapes the Human Mind. London: Oxford University Press; 1997.
39. Pelphrey KA, Carter EJ. Brain mechanisms for social perception: lessons from autism and typical development. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1145: 283-299.
40. Pollick FE, Kay JW, Heim K, Stringer R. Gender recognition from point-light walkers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005; 31: 1247-1265.
41. Johnson KL, Gill S, Reichman V, Tassinary LG. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007; 93: 321-334.
42. Sebanz N, Shiffrar M. Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychol Bull Rev 2009; 16: 170-175.
43. Chouchourelou A, Matsuka T, Harber K, Shiffrar M. The visual analysis of emotional actions. Social Neuro 2006; 1: 63-74.
44. Pollick FE, Paterson HM, Bruderlin A, Sanford AJ. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 2001; 82: 51-61.
45. Clarke TJ, Bradshaw MF, Field DT, Hampson SE, Rose D. The perception of emotion from body movement in point-light displays of interpersonal dialogue. Perception 2005; 34: 1171-1180.
46. Shiffrar M, Kaiser M, Chouchourelou A. Seeing human movement as inherently social. RB, In: Adams Jr. Ambady N, Nakayama K, Shimojo S, eds. The Science of Social Vision. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010; 262-277.
47. Saygin AP. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas are necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 2007; 130: 2452-2461.
48. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2009; 5: 24-34.
49. Puce A, Perrett DI. Electrophysiological and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358: 435-445.
50. Grossman ED, Blake R, Kim CY. Learning to see biological motion: brain activity parallels behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16: 1669-1679.
51. Grossman ED, Blake R. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Res 2001; 41: 1475-1482.
52. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 991-1001.
53. Grossman ED, Battelli L, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS over STSp disrupts perception of biological motion. Vision Res 2005; 45: 2847-2853.
54. Saygin AP, Wilson SM, Hagler DJ, Bates E, Sereno MI. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 6181-6188.
55. Ulloa ER, Pineda JA. Recognition of point-light biological motion: mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity. Behav Brain Res 2007; 183: 188-194.
56. Stevens JA, Fonlupt P, Shiffrar M, Decety J. New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 109-115.
57. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser D, Grezes J, Passingham R, Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15: 1243-1249.
58. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 267-278.
59. Gallagher HL, Frith CD. Dissociable neural pathways for the perception and recognition of expressive and instrumental gestures. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1725-1736.
60. Amaral DG. The amygdala, social behavior, and danger detection. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003; 1000: 337-347.
61. Wheaton KJ, Pipingas A, Silberstein RB, Puce. A. Human neural responses elicited to observing the actions of others. Vis Neuro 2001; 18: 401-406.
62. Virji-Babul N, Cheung T, Weeks D, Kerns K, Shiffrar M. Neural activity involved in the perception of human and meaningful object motion. Neuroreport 2007; 18: 1125-1128.
63. Pavlova M, Lutzenberger W, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N. Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological motion: analyzing gamma MEG activity. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14: 181-188.
64. Mather G, West S. Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays. Perception 1993; 22: 759-766.
65. Pyles JA, Garcia JO, Hoffman DD, Grossman ED. Visual perception and neural correlates of novel "biological motion." Vision Res 2007; 47: 2786-2797.
66. Martineau J, Cochin S. Visual perception in children: human, animal and virtual movement activates different cortical areas. Int J Psychophysiol 2003; 51: 37-44.
67. Virji-Babul N, Kerns K, Zhou E, Kapur A, Shiffrar M. Perceptual-motor deficits in children with Down syndrome: implications for intervention. Downs Syndr Res Pract 2006; 10: 74-82.
68. Serino A, Casavecchia C, De Fillippo L, Coccia M, Shiffrar M, Ladavas E. Lesions to the motor system affect action understanding. J CognNeuro 2010; 22: 413-426.
69. Funk M, Shiffrar M, Brugger P. Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception. Exp Brain Res 2005; 164: 341-346.
70. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA; 2000.
71. Kaiser M, Shiffrar M. The visual perception of motion by observers with ASD: a review and synthesis. Psychol Bull Rev 2009; 16: 761-777.
72. Hadjikhani N, Joseph RM, Snyder J, Tager-Flusberg H. Anatomical differences in the mirror neuron system and social cognition network in autism. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 1276-1282.
73. Hurst RM, Mitchell JT, Kimbrel NA, Kwapil TK, Nelson-Gray RO. Examination of the reliability and factor structure of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a non-clinical sample. Pers Individ Dif 2007; 43: 1938-1949.
74. Kaiser M, Shiffrar M. Visual sensitivity to human movement is related to observer social abilities. Submitted for publication.
75. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1986.