Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 543-553

  Wilson, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; IMITATION; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REVIEW;

COGNITION; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 85047684769     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.543     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Neural expectations: A possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language. Communication and Cognition, 29, 393-424.
2. Awh, E., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780-790.
3. Ayres, T. J., Jonides, J., Reitman, J. S., Egan, J. C., & Howard, D. A. (1979). Differing suffix effects for the same physical suffix. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 315-321.
4. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 647-667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Beardsworth, T., & Buckner, T. (1981). The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 19-22.
8. Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. (1997). The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 560-564.
9. Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 667-721.
10. Cabe, P. A., & Pittenger, J. B. (2000). Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 313-324.
11. Campbell, R., & Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 85-99.
12. Clark, A., & Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7, 5-16.
13. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umilta, C. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8, 347-349.
14. Crowder, R. G., & Surprenant, A. M. (1995). On the linguistic module in auditory memory. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (pp. 49-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Decety, J., & Grezes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
16. Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F., & Fazio, F. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions: Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain, 120, 1763-1777.
17. Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86-89.
18. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
19. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiohgy, 73, 2608-2611.
20. Foreit, K. G. (1976). Short-lived auditory memory for pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 268-370.
21. Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realistic perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
22. Fowler, C. A. (1994). Auditory "objects": The role of motor activity in auditory perception and speech perception. In K. H. Pribram (Ed.), Brain and self organization (pp. 593-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Fowler, C. A., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1990). Duplex perception: A comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 742-754.
24. Gallagher, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 211-233.
25. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
26. Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1-29.
27. Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Bertolani, L., Daprati, E., & Gangitano, M. (2000). Recognising a hand by grasp. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 125-135.
28. Gewirtz, J. L., & Stingle, K. G. (1968). Learning of generalized imitation as the basis for identification. Psychological Review, 75, 374-397.
29. Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: II. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
30. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.
31. Greene, R. L., & Crowder, R. G. (1984). Modality and suffix effects in the absence of auditory stimulation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 371-382.
32. Greene, R. L., & Samuel, A. G. (1986). Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 517-524.
33. Grezes, J., Costes, N., & Decety, J. (1998). Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 553-582.
34. Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers: Phonetic coding in temporal order recall. Memory & Cognition, 18, 604-610.
35. Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., Kirveskari, E., Salenius, S., & Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: A neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 15061-15065.
36. Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 603-621.
37. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999, December 24). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
38. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
39. Johansson, G. (1977). Studies on visual perception of locomotion. Perception, 6, 365-376.
40. Jones, G. V. (1990). Misremembering a common object: When left is not right. Memory & Cognition, 18, 174-182.
41. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.-P., & Viviani, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 706-716.
42. Klapp, S. T., Porter-Graham, K. A., & Hoifjeld, A. R. (1991). The relation of perception and motor action: Ideomotor compatibility and interference in divided attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 155-162.
43. Klima, E. S., Tzeng, O., Fok, A., Bellugi, U., & Corina, D. (1996). From sign to script: Effects of linguistic experience on perceptual categorization (Tech. Rep. No. INC-9604). San Diego: University of California, San Diego, Institute for Neural Computation.
44. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 2, 253-270.
45. Kourtzi, Z., & Shiffrar, M. (1999). Dynamic representations of human body movement. Perception, 28, 49-62.
46. Kunkler-Peck, A. J., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 279-294.
47. Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1989, January 27). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
49. Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
50. Locke, J. L., & Kutz, K. J. (1975). Memory for speech and speech for memory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 176-191.
51. Mann, V. A., & Liberman, A. M. (1983). Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition, 14, 211-235.
52. Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [(Latin small letter esh)]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
53. Martin, M., & Jones, G. V. (1998). Generalizing everyday memory: Signs and handedness. Memory & Cognition, 26, 193-200.
54. Martin, M., & Jones, G. V. (1999). Hale-Bopp and handedness: Individual differences in memory for orientation. Psychological Science, 10, 267-270.
55. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753-771.
56. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
57. McLeod, P., & Posner, M. I. (1984). Privileged loops from percept to act. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 55-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977, October 6). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.
59. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1995). Infants' understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 43-69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179-192.
61. Miklósi, A. (1999). From grasping to speech: Imitation might provide a missing link. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 151-152.
62. Miller, J. L. (1990). Speech perception. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language (pp. 69-93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raso, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (Area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226-2230.
64. Ohala, J. (1996). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1718-1725.
65. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
66. Parson, L. M., & Fox, P. T. (1998). The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 583-615.
67. Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., Jerabek, P. A., & Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375, 54-58.
68. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
69. Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., & Tweney, R. (1981). Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American Sign Language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1146-1159.
70. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
72. Ramus, F., Hauser, M. D., Miller, C., Morris, D., & Mehler, J. (2000, April 14). Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351.
73. Reed, C. L., & Farah, M. J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 334-343.
74. Reid, T. (1965). Essays on the intellectual powers of man. In R. J. Herrnstein & E. G. Boring (Eds.), A source book in the history of psychology (pp. 172-178). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1785)
75. Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M. (1989). "Enacted" auditory images are ambiguous; "pure" auditory images are not. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 619-641.
76. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 188-194.
77. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1999). Reply. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 152.
78. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
79. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., & Fazio, F. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246-252.
80. Roberts, L. A. (1986). Modality and suffix effects in memory for melodic and harmonic musical materials. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 123-157.
81. Romanski, L. M., Tian, B., Fritz, J. B., Mishkin, M., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2000). Nature Neuroscience, 3, 965-966.
82. Rubin, D. C., & Kontis, T. C. (1983). A schema for common cents. Memory & Cognition, 11, 335-341.
83. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
84. Scheerer, E. (1984). Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 77-97). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
85. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2-28.
86. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.
87. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379-384.
88. Shiffrar, M., Lichtey, L., & Chatterjee, S. H. (1997). The perception of biological motion across apertures. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 51-59.
89. Shiffrar, M., & Pinto, J. (in press). The visual analysis of bodily motion. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol. 19. Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
90. Smith, J. D., Reisberg, D., & Wilson, M. (1992). Subvocalization and auditory imagery: Interactions between the inner ear and inner voice. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 95-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Smith, J. D., Wilson, M., & Reisberg, D. (1995). The role of inner speech in auditory imagery. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1433-1454.
92. Smyth, M. M., Pearson, N. A., & Pendleton, L. R. (1988). Movement and working memory: Patterns and positions in space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 497-514.
93. Smyth, M. M., & Scholey, K. A. (1994a). Characteristics of spatial memory span: Is there an analogy to the word length effect, based on movement time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 91-117.
94. Smyth, M. M., & Scholey, K. A. (1994b). Interference in immediate spatial memory. Memory & Cognition, 22, 1-13.
95. Spoehr, K. T., & Corin, W. J. (1978). The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 6, 583-589.
96. Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M., & Decety, J. (2000). New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. NeuroReport, 11, 109-115.
97. Surprenant, A. M., Pitt, M. A., & Crowder, R. G. (1993). Auditory recency in immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A, 193-223.
98. Thornton, I. M., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1998). The visual perception of human locomotion. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 535-552.
99. Valenti, S. S., & Costall, A. (1997). Visual perception of lifted weight from kinematic and static (photographic) displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 181-198.
100. Viviani, P. (1990). Motor-perceptual interactions: The evolution of an idea. In M. P. Palmarini (Ed.), Cognitive science in Europe: Issues and trends (pp. 11-39). Boulder, CO: Golem.
101. Viviani, P., Baud-Bovy, G., & Redolfi, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1232-1252.
102. Viviani, P., & Mounoud, P. (1990). Perceptual-motor compatibility in pursuit tracking of two-dimensional movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 407-443.
103. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
104. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992a). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 603-623.
105. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992b). Motor-perceptual interactions. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 229-248). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
106. Whalen, D. H., & Liberman, A. M. (1987, July 10). Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science, 237, 169-171.
107. Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44-57.
108. Wilson, M., Bettger, J. G., Niculae, I., & Klima, E. S. (1997). Modality of language shapes working memory: Evidence from digit span and spatial span in ASL signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 150-160.
109. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1997a). A "phonological loop" in visuospatial working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 25, 313-320.
110. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1997b). Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of working memory. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 123-132.
111. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1998a, November). Spatial coding in working memory for signs. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Washington, DC.
112. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1998b). A "word length effect" for sign language: Further evidence on the role of language in structuring working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 584-590.
113. Wilson, M., Iverson, A., & Emmorey, K. (2001). Further investigation of the phonological similarity effect for sign language: Two effects of spatial similarity. Manuscript submitted for publication.