A case study of enabling factors in the technology integration change process

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 213-228

  Hsu, Pi Sui ^a   Sharma, Priya ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational change; Educational leadership; Educational technology; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961238659     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2002). The experience of a professional community: teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace. Educational Research, 44(3), 237-254.
2. Balach, C. A., & Szymanski, G. J. (2003). The growth of a professional learning community through collaborative action research. A paper presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
3. Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
4. Banathy, B. H. (2001). We enter the twenty-first century with schooling designed in the nineteenth. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18, 287-290.
5. Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (2003). Leaders: strategies for taking charge. New York, NY: Harper Business.
6. Brown, K. (2007). Technology Funding: A How-To Guide, retrieved August 2, 2008 from http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.php?articleID=196604546.
7. Brown, L. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2001). Exploring the relationship between learning and leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22 (5/6), 274-281.
8. Brooks-Young, S. (2007). Going Corporate: Corporations Can Be a Great Source for Grant Funding. Technology and Learning, 27(7), 32-36.
9. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., & Rutowski, K. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72.
10. Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 525-545.
11. Cibulka, J., & Nakayama, M. (2001). Practitioners guide to learning communities, Washington, DC: National partnerships for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
12. Dexter, R. R. (2005). Instructional leadership for systemic change: The story of San Diego's reform. School Administrator, 62(9), 57-57.
13. th Ed.), New York, NY: Columbia University.
14. nd Ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
15. Holloway, R. E. (1996). Diffusion and adoption of educational technology: A critique of research design. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1107-1133.
16. Grove, K., Strudler, N., & Odell, S. (2004). Mentoring toward technology use: Cooperating teacher practice in supporting student teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 85-109.
17. Joseph, R., Jenlink, P. M., Reigeluth, C. M., Carr-Chellman, A., & Nelson, L. M. (2002). Banathy's influence on the guidance system for transforming education. World Future, 58, 379-394.
18. Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Linn, M. C. (2003). Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727-758.
21. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Mount, M. K.,& Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the "Big Five" article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51(4), 849-858.
24. Mullen, C. A. (2002). The original ten: a multisite case study of Florida's Millennium High School reform model. Education policy analysis archives, 10 (40), Retrieved May 20, 2008 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n40.html.
25. National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Nesbit, C. R., DiBiase, W. J., Miller, A. S., & Wallace, J. D. (2001). In their own words: what science and mathematics teacher leaders say are important aspects of professional development, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
27. PASCO Scientific (2008). PASCO Probeware (Version 1) [Computer software], Roseville, CL: PASCO Scientific.
28. Reigeluth, C. M. (1994). The imperative for systemic change. Envisioning a new system of education. In C. Reigeluth, & R. Garfinkle (Eds.), Systemic change in education, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology, 3-11.
29. Rowland, G. (2004). The concept of sustainability in the evolutionary guidance of an educational institution. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(4), 285-296.
30. Seels, B., Campbell, S., & Talsma, V. (2003). Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 91-104.
31. Senge, P., & Lannon-Kim C. (1991). Recapturing the spirit of learning through a systems approach. The School Administrator, 3, 23-28.
32. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B, Walker, L. J., Halverson, R, & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918-940.
33. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Surry, D. W., & Ely, D. P. (2006). Adoption, diffusion, implementation, and institutionalization of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser, & V. J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education, 104-112.
35. Taylor, N., & Wochenske, J. (2001). The San Diego Science Alliance. In Thorson, A. (Ed.), Partnerships with Business and the Community, Columbus, OH: Eisenhower National Clearing House for Mathematics and Science Education, 37-38.
36. Tom Snyder Productions (2008). Tom Snyder Science Court (Version 1) [Computer software], Watertown, MA: Tom Snyder Productions.
37. Vernier Software Technology (2008). PASPORT Sensor (Version 1) [Computer software], Beaverton, OR: Vernier Software Technology.
38. Windschitl, M. (2000). Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 48 (2), 81-96.
39. Yin, R. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd Ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2002). Technology tools for supporting scientific inquiry: A preservice science education course. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 465 602.