Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the medtronic mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 426-434

  Ruzicka, Daniel J ^a   Eichinger, Walter B ^a   Hettich, Ina M ^a   Bleiziffer, Sabine ^a   Bauernschmitt, Robert ^a   Lange, Ruediger ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VENTRICLES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; SYSTOLE;

EID: 50249148892     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Myken PS. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:486-492
2. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Guenzinger R, et al. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: A better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:382-388; discussion 388-389
3. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: A proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1198-1203
4. Vyavahare N, Hirsch D, Lerner E, et al. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by ethanol preincubation. Efficacy and mechanisms. Circulation 1997;95:479488
5. Vesely I. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of 'zero pressure' fixation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:90-99
6. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977;55: 613-618
7. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-458
8. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-988
9. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-218
10. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Acuna JM, Vega Fernandez M, et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: Implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:273-280
11. Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, et al. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1234-1241
12. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2054-2060
13. Seitelberger R, Bialy J, Gottardi R, et al. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: Comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:358-363
14. Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T. Small aortic annulus: The hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1058-1064
15. Cardiovascular implants - Cardiac valve prostheses. Norm ISO/CD 5840,2002
16. Herz- und Gefäβimplantate - Herzklappenprothesen; Deutsche Fassung. Norm DIN EN ISO 5840: 2005, 2005
17. Baciewicz PA, del Rio C, Goncalves MA, Lattouf OM, Guyton RA, Morris DC. Catastrophic thrombosis of porcine aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:817-819
18. Gharagozloo F, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA. Early thrombotic stenosis of aortic bioprosthetic valves: Report of two cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68: 703-705
19. Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement - cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:59-65
20. Tse HF, Cheung BM, Ng W, Chan JK, Devereux RB, Lau CP. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after treatment of hypertension: Comparison of directed M-echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging in quantification of serial mass changes. J Card Fail 2003;9:122-127
21. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Gunzinger R, et al. European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:333-339
22. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1056-1063
23. Botzenhardt F, Gansera B, Kemkes BM. Mid-term hemodynamic and clinical results of the stented porcine Medtronic Mosaic valve in aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;52:34-41
24. Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Thiene G, Nesseris G, Casarotto D, Gerosa G. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: An 8-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1616-1623
25. Riess FC, Bader R, Cramer E, et al. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to ten years. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1310-1318
26. David TE. Is prosthesis-patient mismatch a clinically relevant entity? Circulation 2005;111:3186-3187
27. Mohty-Echahidi D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006;113:420-426
28. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:15-19