Meta-Analysis of Valve Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Mass Regression for Stentless Versus Stented Aortic Valves

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 73-78

  Kunadian, Babu ^a   Vijayalakshmi, Kunadian ^a   Thornley, Andrew R ^a   de Belder, Mark A ^a   Hunter, Steven ^a   Kendall, Simon ^a   Graham, Richard ^a   Stewart, Michael ^a   Thambyrajah, Jeetendra ^a   Dunning, Joel ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; STENTS;

EID: 34250311155     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. David T.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., Feindel C.M., and Cohen G. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121 (2001) 268-277
2. Hammermeister K., Sethi G.K., Henderson W.G., Grover F.L., Oprian C., and Rahimtoola S.H. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1152-1158
3. Jamieson W.R., Burr L.H., Tyers G.F., and Munro A.I. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration. J Heart Valve Dis 3 (1994) 59-65
4. Levy D., Garrison R.J., Savage D.D., Kannel W.B., and Castelli W.P. Left ventricular mass and incidence of coronary heart disease in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 110 (1989) 101-107
5. Jasinski M.J., Ulbrych P., Kolowca M., Szafranek A., Baron J., and Wos S. Early regional assessment of LV mass regression and function after stentless valve replacement: comparative randomized study. Heart Surg Forum 7 (2004) E462-E465
6. Jasinski M.J., Hayton J., Kadziola Z., Wos S., and Sosnowski A.W. Hemodynamic performance after stented vs stentless aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 43 (2002) 313-317
7. Jin X.Y., Zhang Z.M., Gibson D.G., Yacoub M.H., and Pepper J.R. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 683-690
8. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., and Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 17 (1996) 1-12
9. Clarke M., and Oxman A.D. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.0. Issue 2 (Updated March 2003) (2003), The Cochrane Library, Oxford, UK
10. Ali A., Halstead J.C., Cafferty F., et al. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves?. A prospective randomized trial. Circulation 114 (2006) I535-I540
11. Graham R., Thambyrajah J., Stewart M., et al. Improved haemodynamic profile and left ventricular function following aortic valve replacement with a stentless rather than stented bioprosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Heart 91 (2005) A18
12. Perez de Arenaza D., Lees B., Flather M., et al. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 112 (2005) 2696-2702
13. Bakhtiary F., Schiemann M., Dzemali O., et al. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006) 883-888
14. Totaro P., Degno N., Zaidi A., Youhana A., and Argano V. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130 (2005) 1668-1674
15. Doss M., Martens S., Wood J.P., et al. Performance of stentless versus stented aortic valve bioprostheses in the elderly patient: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23 (2003) 299-304
16. Cohen G., Christakis G.T., Joyner C.D., et al. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves?. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 767-775
17. Maselli D., Pizio R., Bruno L.P., Di Bella I., and De Gasperis C. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 966-971
18. Walther T., Falk V., Langebartels G., et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 100 19 suppl (1999) II6-II10
19. Williams R.J., Muir D.F., Pathi V., MacArthur K., and Berg G.A. Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprotheses: hemodynamic performance at 3 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11 (1999) 93-97
20. Santini F., Bertolini P., Montalbano G., et al. Hancock versus stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years. Ann Thorac Surg 66 (1998) S99-S103
21. Jin X.Y., and Westaby S. In vivo hemodynamic characteristics of porcine stentless aortic valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13 (2001) 67-74
22. Jin X.Y., Gibson D.G., Yacoub M.H., and Pepper J.R. Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented valve in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 60 (1995) S395-S401
23. Westaby S., Jin X.Y., Vaccari G., and Katsumata T. The Sorin stentless pericardial valve: implant technique and hemodynamic profile. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11 (1999) 62-68
24. Silberman S., Shaheen J., Merin O., et al. Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves. Ann Thorac Surg 72 (2001) 1217-1221
25. He G.W., Grunkemeier G.L., Gately H.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 59 (1995) 1056-1062