From points to forecasts: Predicting invasive species habitat suitability in the near term

Diversity

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 738-767

  Holcombe, Tracy R ^a   Stohlgren, Thomas J ^a   Jarnevich, Catherine S ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Invasive species; Maximum entropy modeling; Range shifts

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; FORECASTING METHOD; HABITAT QUALITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MAXIMUM ENTROPY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79961147695     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14242818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/d2050738     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, L.W.J. Control of invasive seaweeds. Bot. Mar. 2007, 50, 418-437.
2. Noonburg, E.G.; Byers, J.E. More harm than good: When invader vulnerability to predators enhances impact on native species. Ecology 2005, 86, 2555-2560.
3. Snyder, W.E.; Evans, E.W. Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 2006, 37, 95-122.
4. Crowl, T.A.; Crist, T.O.; Parmenter, R.R.; Belovsky, G.; Lugo, A.E. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 238-246.
5. Wilcove, D.S.; Rothstein, D.; Dubow, J.; Phillips, A.; Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 1998, 48, 607-615.
6. Pimentel, D.; Zuniga, R.; Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 52, 273-288.
7. Leung, B.; Lodge, D.M.; Finnoff, D.; Shogren, J.F.; Lewis, M.A.; Lamberti, G. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269, 2407-2413.
8. Moody, M.E.; Mack, R.N. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. J. App. Ecol. 1988, 25, 1009-1021.
9. Rejmanek, M.; Pitcairn, M.J. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? In Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species; Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N., Eds.; IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 249-253.
10. Thuiller, W.; Albert, C.; Araujo, M.B.; Berry, P.M.; Cabeza, M.; Guisan, A.; Hickler, T.; Midgely, G.F.; Paterson, J.; Schurr, F.M.; Sykes, M.T.; Zimmermann, N.E. Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: Future challenges. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 2008, 9, 137-152.
11. Vitousek, P.M.; Dantonio, C.M.; Loope, L.L.; Westbrooks, R. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 1996, 84, 468-478.
12. Bradley, B.A.; Oppenheimer, M.; Wilcove, D.S. Climate Change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Global Change Biol. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01824.x.
13. Hampe, A.; Petit, R.J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 461-467.
14. Stohlgren, T.J.; Barnett, D.T.; Jarnevich, C.S.; Flather, C.; Kartesz, J. The myth of plant species saturation. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 313-322.
15. Hijmans, R.J.; Graham, C.H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biol. 2006, 12, 2272-2281.
16. Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135, 147-186.
17. Stohlgren, T.J. Measuring Plant Diversity: Lessons from the Field; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007.
18. Stohlgren, T.J.; Schnase, J.L. Risk analysis for biological hazards: What we need to know about invasive species. Risk Anal. 2006, 26, 163-173.
19. Pearson, R.G.; Dawson, T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12, 361-371.
20. Guisan, A.; Thuiller, W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 993-1009.
21. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231-259.
22. Morisette, J.T.; Jarnevich, C.S.; Ullah, A.; Cai, W.J.; Pedelty, J.A.; Gentle, J.E.; Stohlgren, T.J.; Schnase, J L. A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4, 11-17.
23. Ficetola, G.F.; Thuiller, W.; Miaud, C. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species-the American bullfrog. Divers. Distrib.13, 476-485.
24. Galatowitsch, S.M.; Anderson, N.O.; Ascher, P.D. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 1999, 19, 733-755.
25. Ibarraf, F.A.; Cox, J.R.; Martinr, M.H.; Crowl, T.A.; Call, C.A. Predicting buffelgrass survival across a geographical and environmental gradient. J. Range Manag. 1995, 48, 53-59.
26. NIISS National Institute of Invasive Species Science. Available online: http://www.niiss.org/ (accessed February 29, 2010).
27. Graham, J.; Newman, G.; Jarnevich, C.; Shory, R.; Stohlgren, T.J. A global organism detection and monitoring system for non-native species. Ecol. Inform. 2007, 2, 177-183.
28. Nix, H.A. A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia; Longmore, R., Ed.; Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, Australia, 1986.
29. DAYMET. Climatological summaries for the conterminous United States, 1980-1997. In Daily Surface Weather and Climatological Summaries, 2006. Available online: http://daymet.org (accessed March 31, 2009).
30. Daly, C.; Gibson, W.P.; Taylor, G.H.; Johnson, G.L.; Pasteris, P. A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Clim. Res. 2002, 22, 99-113.
31. Jarnevich, C.S.; Stohlgren, T.J. Near term climate projections for invasive species distributions. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 1373-1379.
32. SSI SYSTAT 12.0. Systat Software, Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007.
33. Phillips, S.J.; Dudik, M.; Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Lehmann, A.; Leathwick, J.; Ferrier, S. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 181-197.
34. ESRI ArcGIS 9.3, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.: Redlands, CA, USA, 2008.
35. Swets, J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240, 1285-1293.
36. Scott, J.M.; Heglund, P.; Morrison, M.L.; Raven, P.H. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
37. Lobo, J.M.; Jimenez-Valverde, A.; Real, R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. GlobalEcol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17, 145-151.
38. Hodkinson, D.J.; Thompson, K. Plant dispersal: the role of man. J. App. Ecol. 1997, 34, 1484-1496.
39. Mack, R.N.; Lonsdale, W.M. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience 2001, 51, 95-102.
40. Reichard, S.H.; White, P. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 2001, 51, 103-113.
41. Pearson, R.G.; Raxworthy, C.J.; Nakamura, M.; Peterson, A.T. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34, 102-117.
42. Beaumont, L.J.; Pitman, A.J.; Poulsen, M.; Hughes, L. Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions. Global Change Biol. 13, 1368-1385.
43. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudik, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.; Hijmans, R.J.; Huettmann, F.; Leathwick, J.R.; Lehmann, A.; Li, J.; Lohmann, L.G.; Loiselle, B.A.; Manion, G.; Moritz, C.; Nakamura, M.; Nakazawa, Y.; Overton, J.M.; Peterson, A.T.; Phillips, S.J.; Richardson, K.; Scachetti-Pereira, R.; Schapire, R.E.; Soberon, J.; Williams, S.; Wisz, M.S.; Zimmermann, N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129-151.
44. Evangelista, P.H.; Kumar, S.; Stohlgren, T.J.; Jarnevich, C.S.; Crall, A.W.; Norman, J.B.; Barnett, D.T. Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Divers. Distrib. 14, 808-817.
45. Leathwick, J.R.; Austin, M.P. Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand's old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology 2001, 82, 2560-2573.
46. Anderson, R.P.; Peterson, A.T.; Gomez-Laverde, M. Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 2002, 98, 3-16.
47. Anderson, B.J.; Akcakaya, H.R.; Araujo, M.B.; Fordham, D.A.; Martinez-Meyer, E.; Thuiller, W.; Brook, B.W. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276, 1415-1420.
48. Kumar, S.; Stohlgren, T.J. Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. JENE. 2009, 1, 94-98.
49. Kumar, S.; Spaulding, S.A.; Stohlgren, T.J.; Hermann, K.A.; Schmidt, T.S.; Bahls, L.L. Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Front. Ecol. Environ.2009, 7, 415-420.
50. Araujo, M.B.; New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol.Evol. 2007, 42-47.
51. Stohigren, T.J.; Ma, P.; Kumar, S.; Rocca, M.; Morisette, J.T.; Jarnevich, C.S.; Benson, N. Ensemble habitat mapping of invasive plant species. Risk Anal. 2009, 30, 224-235.
52. Crosier, C.S. Synergistic Methods to Generate Predictive Models at Large Spatial Extents and Fine Resolution; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2004.
53. Stohlgren, T.J.; Jarnevich, C.; Chong, G.W.; Evangelista, P.H. Scale and plant invasions: a theory of biotic acceptance. Preslia 2006, 78, 405-426.