A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 11-17

  Morisette, Jeffrey T ^a   Jarnevich, Catherine S ^b   Ullah, Asad ^c   Cai, Weijie ^d   Pedelty, Jeffrey A ^a   Gentle, James E ^d   Stohlgren, Thomas J ^b   Schnase, John L ^a  

^a NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^b FORT COLLINS SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC   (United States)

^d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT QUALITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MAPPING;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

TAMARICACEAE; TAMARIX; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA;

EID: 32444434713     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0012:ATHSMF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Christensen EM. 1962. The rate of naturalization of Tamarix in Utah. Am Midl Nat 68: 51-57.
2. Everitt JH and DeLoach CJ. 1990. Remote sensing of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) and associated vegetation. Weed Sci 38: 273-78.
3. Everitt JH, DeLoach CJ, and Hart WG. 1989. Using remote sensing for detecting brush and weeds on rangelands in the southwestern United States. In: Delfosse ES (Ed). Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. 6-11 March 1988, Rome, Italy.
4. Everitt JH, Escobar DE, Alaniz MA, et al. 1996. Using spatial information technologies to map Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) infestations. Weed Sci 44: 194-201.
5. Friedl MA, McIver DK, Hodges JCF, et al. 2002. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83: 287-302.
6. GISD (Global Invasive Species Database). 2005. Tamarix ramosissima (shrub, tree). www.issg.org/database/species/SimilarSpecies.asp?si=72&fr= 1&sts=. Viewed 19 August 2005.
7. Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
8. Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, et al. 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83: 195-213.
9. Justice CO, Townshend JRG, Vermote EF, et al. 2002. An overview of MODIS land data processing and product status. Remote Sens Environ 83: 3-15.
10. Keane RE, Rollins MG, McNicoll CH, and Parsons RA. 2002. Integrating ecosystem sampling, gradient modeling, remote sensing, and ecosystem simulation to create spatially explicit landscape inventories. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
11. Keating KA and Cherry S. 2004. Use and interpretation of logistics regression in habitat selection studies. J Wildlife Manage 68: 774-89.
12. LPDAAC (Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center). 2005. MODIS data products. http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/modis/dataprod.html. Viewed 18 August 2005.
13. Moody A and Johnson DM. 2001. Land-surface phenologies from AVHRR using the discrete Fourier transform. Remote Sens Environ 75: 305-23.
14. NIISS (National Institute for Invasive Species Science). 2005. National Institute for Invasive Species Science. www.NIISS.org. Viewed 18 August 2005.
15. Peterson EB. 2005. Estimating cover of an invasive grass (Bromus tectorum) using tobit regression and phenology derived from two dates of Landsat ETM+ data. Int J Remote Sens 26: 2491-507.
16. Robinson TR. 1965. Introduction, spread, and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey. USGS Professional Paper 491-A.
17. Shafroth PB, Cleverly JR, Dudley TL, et al. 2005. Control of Tamarix in the Western United States: implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environ Manage 35: 231-46.
18. USDoI (United States Department of Interior). 2005. Press release. www.doi.gov/news/05_News_Releases/050513b. Viewed 18 August 2005.