A global organism detection and monitoring system for non-native species

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 177-183

  Graham, Jim ^a   Newman, Greg ^a   Jarnevich, Catherine ^b   Shory, Rick ^a   Stohlgren, Thomas J ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Database; Detection; Internet; Invasive; Monitoring; Non native

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIOMONITORING; DATABASE; DETECTION METHOD; GIS; INVASIVE SPECIES; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 34548495299     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barnett, D.T., Stohlgren, T.J., Jarnevich, C.S., Ericson, J.A., Davern, T., Simonson, S., in press. The art and science of weed mapping. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. [Feb 6, Electronic publication ahead of print].
2. Bowker G.C. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 30 (2000) 643-683
3. Crall, A.W., Meyerson, L.A., Stohlgren, T.J., Jarnevich, C.S., Newman, G.J., Graham, J.J., 2006. Show me the numbers: what data currently exists for non-native species in the U.S.? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, in review.
4. DiGIR. 2007. digir.sourceforge.net. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval.
5. ECW. 2006. Earth Resources Mapping. www.ermapper.com.
6. Evenden G.I. Cartographic Projection Procedures for the UNIX Environment - A User's Manual, Open-File Report 90-284 (1990), United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey, Woods Hole, MA
7. Jacobson I., Booch G., and Rumbaugh J. The Unified Software Development Process (1998), Addison Wesley Longman Inc., Reading, Massachusetts
8. Jarnevich, C.S. Graham, J., Newman, G., Crall, A., Stohlgren, T., in press. Balancing data sharing requirements for analyses with data sensitivity. Biological Invasions.
9. Kamath Y.H., Smilan R.E., and Smith J.G. Reaping benefits with object-oriented technology. AT&T Technology 72 (1993) 14-24
10. Longley P.A., Goodchild M.F., Maguire D.J., and Rhind D.W. Geographic Information System and Science (2001), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England
11. Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M., and Bazzaz F.A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 689-710
12. Morisette J.T., Jarnevich C.S., Ullah A., Cai W.J., Pedelty J.A., Gentle J.E., Stohlgren T.J., and Schnase J.L. A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (2006) 11-17
13. Pimentel D., Zuniga R., and Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52 (2005) 273-288
14. Schnase J., Stohlgren T.J., and Smith J.A. The national invasive species forecasting system: a strategic NASA/USGS partnership to manage biological invasions. Earth Observation Magazine 11 (2002) 46-49
15. Schnase J.L., Cushing J., Frame M., Forndorf A., Landis E., Maier D., and Silberschatz A. Information technology challenges of biodiversity and ecosystems informatics. Information Systems 28 (2003) 339-345
16. Stohlgren T.J., and Schnase J.L. Risk analysis for biological hazards: what we need to know about invasive species. Risk Analysis 26 (2006) 163-173
17. Wilcove D.S., Rothstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A., and Losos E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48 (1998) 607-615