Interactions of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors with an electrospun nanofbrillar surface in vitro

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 559-570

  Rahjouei, Ali ^a,b   Kiani, Sahar ^a   Zahabi, Azadeh ^a   Mehrjardi, Narges Zare ^a   Hashemi, Mehrdad ^b   Baharvand, Hossein ^a,c  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND CULTURE   (Iran)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Human embryonic stem cells; Migration; Nanofbrillar surface; Neural progenitors; Proliferation

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY; NEURONS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

DIFFERENTIATION; ELECTROSPUNS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; IN-VITRO; MIGRATION; NANOFBRILLAR SURFACE; NEURAL PROGENITOR; PROLIFERATION; STEM CELL TECHNOLOGY;

STEM CELLS;

MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOFIBER; NESTIN; POLYAMIDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PAX6; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX1;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSPINNING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IN VITRO STUDY; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NERVE GROWTH; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEURITE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 79961055812     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/IJAO.2011.8511     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science. 2009;324(5935):1673-1677. Medline. doi:10.1126/sci-ence.1171643
2. Ahmed I, Ponery AS, Nur EKA, et al. Morphology, cytoskel-etal organization, and myosin dynamics of mouse embryonic fbroblasts cultured on nanofbrillar surfaces. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;301(1-2):241-249. Medline. doi:10.1007/ s11010-007-9417-6
3. Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, Vacanti J P. A biodegradable nanofber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24(12):2077-2082. Medline. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X
4. Yim EK. Nanotopography-induced cell behavior and human stem cell differentiation. Seminar held at Duke University on September 21, 2006.
5. Farzaneh Z, Pournasr B, Aghdami N, Ebrahimi M, Baha-rvand H. Enhanced functions of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Hepatocyte-like Cells on Three-dimensional Nanofbrillar Surfaces. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2010;6(4):601-610. doi: 10.1007/s12015-010-9179-5
6. Piryaei A, Valojerdi MR, Shahsavani M, Baharvand H. Differentiation of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Hepatocyte-like Cells on Nanofbers and Their Transplantation into a Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Liver Fibro-sis Model. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7(1):103-118. doi: 10.1007/ s12015-010-9126-5
7. Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, et al. A three-dimensional nanof-brous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26(6):599-609. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.005
8. Gerardo-Nava J, Fuhrmann T, Klinkhammer K, et al. Human neural cell interactions with orientated electrospun nanof-bers in vitro. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2009;4(1):11-30. Med-line. doi:10.2217/17435889.4.1.11
9. Li WJ, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, Tuan RS. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nano-fbrous poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67(4):1105-1114. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10101
10. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electro-spun nanofbrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60(4):613-621. Medline. doi:10.1002/jbm.10167
11. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5395):1145-1147. Medline. doi:10.1126/sci-ence.282.5391.1145
12. Erceg S, Ronaghi M, Stojkovic M. Human embryonic stem cell differentiation toward regional specifc neural precursors. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):78-87. Medline. doi:10.1634/ stemcells.2008-0543
13. He L, Liao S, Quan D, et al. Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(8):2960-2969. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.039
14. Kumbar SG, James R, Nukavarapu S P, Laurencin CT. Electro-spun nanofber scaffolds: engineering soft tissues. Biomed Mater. 2008;3(3):034002. Medline. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034002
15. Baharvand H, Ashtiani SK, Taee A, et al. Generation of new human embryonic stem cell lines with diploid and triploid karyotypes. Dev Growth Differ. 2006;48(2):117-128. Medline. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.2006.00851.x
16. Mollamohammadi S, Taei A, Pakzad M, et al. A simple and effcient cryopreservation method for feeder-free dissociated human induced pluripotent stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2468-2476. Medline. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep244
17. Hatami M, Mehrjardi NZ, Kiani S, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursor transplants in collagen scaffolds promote recovery in injured rat spinal cord. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(5):618-630. Medline. doi:10.1080/14653240903005802
18. Pfaff MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians T P. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeep-er--Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Bio-technol Lett. 2004;26(6):509-515. Medline. doi:10.1023/ B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47
19. Hall PE, Lathia JD, Caldwell MA, Ffrench-Constant C. Lami-nin enhances the growth of human neural stem cells in de-fned culture media. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9:71. Medline.doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-71
20. Cohen MA, Itsykson P, Reubinoff BE. Neural differentiation of human ES cells. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2007; 36:23.7.1-20. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb2307s36
21. Choudhary RK, Daniels KM, Evock-Clover CM, Garrett W, Capuco AV. Technical note: A rapid method for 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) immunostaining in bovine mammary cryosections that retains RNA quality. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(6):2574-2579. Medline. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2837
22. Bullwinkel J, Baron-Luhr B, Ludemann A, Wohlenberg C, Gerdes J, Scholzen T. Ki-67 protein is associated with ribo-somal RNA transcription in quiescent and proliferating cells. J Cell Physiol. 2006;206(3):624-635. Medline. doi:10.1002/ jcp.20494
23. Perrier AL, Tabar V, Barberi T, et al. Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(34):12543-12548. Medline. doi:10.1073/pnas.0404700101
24. Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T, et al. Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1134-1140. Medline. doi:10.1038/nbt1201-1134
25. Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brustle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1129-1133. Medline. doi:10.1038/nbt1201-1129
26. Schuldiner M, Eiges R, Eden A, et al. Induced neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Brain Res. 2001;913(2):201-205. Medline. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02776-7
27. Shin S, Mitalipova M, Noggle S, et al. Long-term proliferation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neuroepithe-lial cells using defned adherent culture conditions. Stem Cells. 2006;24(1):125-138. Medline. doi:10.1634/stem-cells.2004-0150
28. Chambers SM, Fasano CA, Papapetrou E P, Tomishima M, Sad-elain M, Studer L. Highly effcient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat Bio-technol. 2009;27(3):275-280. Medline. doi:10.1038/nbt.1529
29. Daadi MM, Maag AL, Steinberg GK. Adherent self-renewable human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cell line: functional engraftment in experimental stroke model. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(2):e1644.
30. Dhara SK, Hasneen K, Machacek DW, Boyd NL, Rao RR, Stice SL. Human neural progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells in feeder-free cultures. Differentiation. 2008;76(5):454-464. Medline. doi:10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00256.x
31. Hong S, Kang UJ, Isacson O, Kim KS. Neural precursors derived from human embryonic stem cells maintain long-term proliferation without losing the potential to differentiate into all three neural lineages, including dopaminergic neurons. J Neurochem. 2008; 104(2): 316-324.
32. Joannides AJ, Fiore-Heriche C, Battersby AA, et al. A scale-able and defned system for generating neural stem cells from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25(3):731-737. Medline. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0562
33. Koch P, Opitz T, Steinbeck JA, Ladewig J, Brustle O. A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(9):3225-3230. Medline. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808387106
34. Hu Q, Zhang L, Wen J, et al. The EGF receptor-sox2-EGF receptor feedback loop positively regulates the self-renewal of neural precursor cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28(2):279-286.
35. Schindler M, Ahmed I, Kamal J, et al. A synthetic nanofbrillar matrix promotes in vivo-like organization and morphogenesis for cells in culture. Biomaterials. 2005;26(28):5624-5631. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomate-rials.2005.02.014
36. Xie J, Willerth SM, Li X, et al. The differentiation of embryonic stem cells seeded on electrospun nanofbers into neural lineages. Biomaterials. 2009;30(3):354-362. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.046
37. Ahmed I, Liu HY, Mamiya PC, et al. Three-dimensional nanofbrillar surfaces covalently modifed with tenascin-C-derived peptides enhance neuronal growth in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76(4):851-860. Medline. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30587
38. NurE-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Babu AN, Schindler M, Meiners S. Covalently attached FGF-2 to three-dimensional polyamide nanofbrillar surfaces demonstrates enhanced biological stability and activity. Mol Cell Biochem.2008;309(1-2):157-166. Medline. doi:10.1007/s11010-007-9654-8
39. Nur-E-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Schindler M, Meiners S. Three-dimensional nanofbrillar surfaces promote self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24(2):426-433. Medline. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0170
40. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(1):63-73. Medline. doi:10.1038/nrm2597
41. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJ, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fbroblast spreading and proliferation. Tissue Eng. 2002;8(6):1099-1108. Medline. doi:10.1089/107632702320934191
42. Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M. Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:463-518. Medline. doi:10.1146/annurev.cell-bio.12.1.463
43. Cary LA, Han DC, Guan JL. Integrin-mediated signal trans-duction pathways. Histol Histopathol. 1999;14:1001-1009. Medline.
44. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110(6):673-687. Medline. doi:10.1016/ S0092-8674(02)00971-6
45. Legate KR, Wickstrom SA, Fassler R. Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling. Genes Dev. 2009;23(4):397-418. Medline. doi:10.1101/gad.1758709
46. Nur-E-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Schindler M, Meiners S. Three dimensional nanofbrillar surfaces induce activation of Rac. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;331(2):428-434. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.195