Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fiber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2960-2969

  He, Liumin ^a,b   Liao, Susan ^a   Quan, Daping ^b   Ma, Kun ^a   Chan, Casey ^a   Ramakrishna, S ^a   Lu, Jiang ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Arrangement; Diameter; Differentiation; Electrospun fibers; Proliferation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CELL ENGINEERING; CYTOLOGY; ELECTROSPINNING; MAMMALS; NEURONS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; TISSUE;

ALIGNED FIBERS; ARRANGEMENT; DIAMETER; DIFFERENTIATION; ELECTROSPUN FIBERS; FIBER PATTERNS; FIBRE DIMENSIONS; POLY (L-LACTIDE); PROLIFERATION; RANDOM FIBERS;

FIBERS;

MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOFIBER; POLYLACTIDE; POLYESTER; PROTEIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ELONGATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL POLARITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CEREBELLUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBER; MESH SLING; MOUSE; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEURITE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIKARYON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINDLE CELL; STEM CELL; TOPOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; BIOASSAY; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; TIME; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CEREBELLUM; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NEURITES; POLYESTERS; PROTEINS; STEM CELLS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 77956621355     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.039     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-88.
2. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 1997;18:1573-83.
3. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-81.
4. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-7.
5. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Simpson J, Wieland M, Landolt D, et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005;26:1837-47.
6. Lim JY, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Runt J, Donahue HJ. Human fetal osteoblastic cell response to substratum nanotopography: variation in cell morphology, protein synthesis, and osteoblastic phenotype on polymer-demixed nanotopographic islands. J R Soc Interface 2005;2:97-108.
7. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:291-300.
8. Tsuruma A, Tanaka M, Yamamoto S, Fukushima N, Yabu H, Shimomura M. Topographical control of neurite extension on stripe-patterned polymer films. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Aspects 2006;284:470-4.
9. Rajnicek AM, Britland S, McCaig CD. Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. J Cell Sci 1997;110:2905-13.
10. Foley JD, Grunwald EW, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. Biomaterials 2005;26:3639-44.
11. Goldner JS, Bruder JM, Li G, Gazzola D, Hoffman-Kim D. Neurite bridging across micropatterned grooves. Biomaterials 2006;27:460-72.
12. Drotleff S, Lungwitz U, Breunig M, Dennis A, Blunk T, Tessmar J, et al. Biomimetic polymers in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;58:385-407.
13. Elsdale T, Bard J. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol 1972;54:626-37.
14. Riesle J, Hollander AP, Langer R, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Collagen in tissue-engineered cartilage: types, structure, and crosslinks. J Cell Biochem 1998;71:313-27.
15. Blunk T, Gopferich A, Tessmar J. Biomimetic polymers. Biomaterials 2003;24:4335.
16. Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. Tissue engineering: the next generation. Tissue Eng 2006;12:3261-3.
17. Moutos FT, Freed LE, Guilak F. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 2007;6:162-7.
18. Reneker DH, Chun I. Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1996;7:216-23.
19. Shin YM, Hohman MM, Brenner MP, Rutledge GC. Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities. Polymer 2001;42:9955-67.
20. Barnes CP, Sell SA, Boland ED, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Nanofiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:1413-33.
21. Xu CY, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: a potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25:877-86.
22. Tan SH, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Systematic parameter study for ultrafine fiber fabrication via electrospinning process. Polymer 2005;46:6128-34.
23. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly (L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005;26:2603-10.
24. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, Yong T, Ma Z, Ramaseshan R. Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues. Mater Today 2006;9:40-50.
25. Chew SY, Mi RF, Hoke A, Leong KW. The effect of the alignment of electrospun fibrous scaffolds on Schwann cell maturation. Biomaterials 2008;29:653-61.
26. Zhong SP, Teo WE, Zhu X, Beuerman RW, Ramakrishna S, Yue L. An aligned nanofibrous collagen scaffold by electrospinning and its effects on in vitro fibroblast culture. J Biomed Mater Res 2006; 79A: 456-63.
27. Patel S, Kurpinski K, Quigley R, Gao HF, Hsiao BS, Poo MM, et al. Bioactive nanofibers: synergistic effects of nanotopography and chemical signaling on cell guidance. Nano Lett 2007;7:2122-8.
28. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, Bhowmick S. Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007;13:579-87.
29. Badami AS, Kreke MR, Thompson MS, Riffle JS, Goldstein AS. Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly (lactic acid) substrates. Biomaterials 2006;27:596-606.
30. Kwon IK, Kidoaki S, Matsuda T. Electrospun nano- to microfiber fabrics made of biodegradable copolyesters: structural characteristics, mechanical properties and cell adhesion potential. Biomaterials 2005;26:3929-39.
31. Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. Biomacromolecules 2006;7:2796-805.
32. Christopherson GT, Song HJ, Mao HQ. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 2009;30:556-64.
33. Tuszynski GP, Murphy A. Spectrophotometric quantitation of anchoragedependent cell numbers using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent. Anal Biochem 1990;184:189-91.
34. Kong HJ, Liu J, Riddle K, Matsumoto T, Leach K, Mooney DJ. Non-viral gene delivery regulated by stiffness of cell adhesion substrates. Nat Mater 2005;4:460-4.
35. Ingber DE. Mechanical control of tissue growth: function follows form. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:11571-2.
36. Andersson AS, Backhed F, Euler AV, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D, Kasemo B. Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. Biomaterials 2003;24:3427-36.
37. Edgar D, Kenny S, Almond S, Murray P. Topography, stem cell behaviour, and organogenesis. Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20:737-40.
38. Vrieze SD, Camp TV, Nelvig A, Hagström B, Westbroek P, Clerck KD. The effect of temperature and humidity on electrospinning. J Mater Sci 2009;44:1357-62.
39. Wang C, Chien HS, Hsu CH, Wang YC, Wang CT, Lu HA. Electrospinning of polyacrylonitrile solutions at elevated temperatures. Macromolecules 2007;40:7973-83.
40. Tripatanasuwan S, Zhong ZX, Reneker DH. Effect of evaporation and solidification of the charged jet in electrospinning of poly (ethylene oxide) aqueous solution. Polymer 2007;48:5742-6.
41. You Y, Lee SJ, Min BM, Park WH. Effect of solution properties on nanofibrous structure of electrospun poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid). J Appl Polym Sci 2006;99:1214-21.
42. You Y, Min BM, Lee S, Lee TS, Park WH. In vitro degradation behavior of electrospun polyglycolide, polylactide, and poly (lactide-co-glycolide). J Appl Polym Sci 2005;95:193-200.
43. Berkessel A, Adrio JA, Hüttenhain D, Neudörfl JM. Unveiling the "booster effect" of fluorinated alcohol solvents: aggregation-induced conformational changes and cooperatively enhanced H-bonding. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:8421-6.
44. Theron A, Zussman E, Yarin AL. Electrostatic field-assisted alignment of electrospun nanofibres. Nanotechnology 2001;12:384-90.
45. Min BM, Lee G, Kim SH, Nam YS, Lee TS, Park WH. Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2004;25:1289-97.
46. Ma T, Li Y, Yang ST. Effects of pore size in 3-D fibrous matrix on human trophoblast tissue development. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000;70:606-18.
47. Goldstein AS. Effect of seeding osteoprogenitor cells as dense clusters on cell growth and differentiation. Tissue Eng 2001;7:817-27.
48. Takahashi Y, Tabata Y. Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2004;15:41-57.
49. Weiss L. Cell contact phenomena. In Vitro 1970;5:48-78.
50. Li JM, Shi RY. Fabrication of patterned multi-walled poly-L-lactic acid conduits for nerve regeneration. J Neurosci Methods 2007;165:257-64.