Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 831-854

  Knill, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BAYES THEOREM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONOCULAR VISION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 0037336174     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00003-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aggarwal J.K., Cai Q., Liao W., Sabata B. Nonrigid motion analysis: articulated and elastic motion. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 70:1998;142-156.
2. Bakshi S., Yang Y.H. Towards developing a practical system to recover light, reflectance and shape. International Journal of Pattern Recognition. 11(6):1997;991-1022.
3. Blake, A., & Marinos, C. (1989). Shape from texture: estimation, isotropy and moments. Oxford University Technical Report, OUEL 1774/89.
4. Blake A., Bulthoff H.H., Sheinberg A. Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vision Research. 33(12):1993;1723-1737.
5. Brady M., Yuille A.L. An extremum principle for shape from contour. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. PAMI-6(3):1984;288-301.
6. Buckley D., Frisby J., Blake A. Does the human visual system implement an ideal observer theory of slant from texture? Vision Research. 36(8):1996;1163-1176.
7. Cutting J., Millard R. Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 113(2):1984;198-216.
8. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature Neuroscience. 415:2002;429-433.
9. Freeman W.T. Exploiting the generic viewpoint assumption. International Journal of Computer Vision. 20:1996;243-261.
10. Garding J. Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. 2(4):1992;327-350.
11. Garding, J. (1995). Surface orientation and curvature from differential texture distortion. In Proceedings of 5th international conference on computer vision, Cambridge, MA, pp. 733-739.
12. Gharamani Z., Wolpert D.M., Jordan M.I. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. Morasso P.S., Sanguineti V. Self-organization computational maps and motor control. 1997;North-Holland Press, Amsterdam.
13. Gibson J.J. The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology. 63:1950;367-384.
14. Horaud R., Brady M. On the geometric interpretation of image contours. Artificial Intelligence. 37:1988;333-353.
15. Ikeuchi K., Horn B.K.P. Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;141-184.
16. Jacobs R.A. What determines visual cue reliability? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;345-350.
17. Jepson A., Richards W., Knill D.C. Modal structure and reliable inference. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perceptio as Bayesian inference. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
18. Kanade T. Recovery of the three-dimensional shape of an object from a single view. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;409-460.
19. Knill D.C. Perception of surface contours and surface shape: from computation to psychophysics. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 9(4):1992;1449-1464.
20. Knill D.C. Discriminating surface slant from texture: comparing human and ideal observers. Vision Research. 38:1998;1683-1711.
21. Knill D.C. Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture. Vision Research. 38:1998;2635-2656.
22. Knill D.C. Surface orientation from texture: Ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues. Vision Research. 38:1998;1655-1682.
23. Knill D.C. Contour into texture: the information content of surface contours and texture flow. Journal of the Optical Society A. 18(1):2001;12-36.
24. Koederink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 8:1991;377-385.
25. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research. 35(3):1995;389-412.
26. Langer M.S., Zucker S.W. Shape from shading on a cloudy day. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11:1994;467-478.
27. Li A., Zaidi Q. Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vision Research. 40:2000;217-242.
28. Li R., Maloney L.T., Landy M.S. Combination of consistent and inconsistent depth cues. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38(4):1997;4229-4229.
29. Mackay D.J.C. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computing. 4:1992;415-447.
30. Malik J., Rosenholtz R. Recovering surface curvature and orientation from texture distortion: a least squares algorithm and sensitivity analysis. Proceedings of 3rd European conference on computer vision. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol. 800:1995;353-364 Springer-Verlag.
31. Pentland A.P. Linear shape from shading. International Journal of Computer Vision. 4:1990;153-163.
32. Richards W., Jepson A., Feldman J. Priors, preferences and categorical percepts. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perceptio as Bayesian inference. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England.
33. Ripley B.D. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
34. Rosenholtz R., Malik J. Shape from texture: isotropy or homogeneity (or both)? Vision Research. 37(16):1997;2283-2294.
35. Stevens K.A. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;47-73.
36. Todd J., Akerstrom R. Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1987;242-255.
37. Ullman The interpretation of structure form motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 203:1979;405-426.
38. Weiss I. 3D shape representation by contours. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. 41:1988;80-100.
39. Witkin A.P. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence. 17(1):1981;17-45.
40. Yuille A., Bulthoff H. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perception as Bayesian inference. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
41. Yuille A.L., Clark J.J. Bayesian models, deformable templates and competitive priors. Harris L., Jenkin M. Spatial vision in humans and robots. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.