An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: Can This implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?

Laryngoscope

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1794-1799

  Postelmans, Job T F ^b   Van Spronsen, Erik ^a   Grolman, Wilko ^a,c   Stokroos, Robert J ^b   Tange, Rinze A ^c   Maré, Marcel J ^a   Dreschler, Wouter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; residual hearing; suprameatal approach

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MENINGITIS; OTOSCLEROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDUAL HEARING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960948896     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21866     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Postelmans JT, Cleffken B, Stokroos RJ,. Post-operative complications of cochlear implantation in adults and children: five years' experience in Maastricht. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121: 318-323. (Pubitemid 46714669)
2. Proops DW, Stoddart RL, Donaldson I,. Medical, surgical and audiological complications of the first 100 adult cochlear implant patients in Birmingham. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 1999; 24: 14-17. (Pubitemid 29387133)
3. Collins MM, Hawthorne MH, el-Hmd K,. Cochlear implantation in a district general hospital: problems and complications in the first five years. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111: 325-332. (Pubitemid 27223181)
4. House WF,. Cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85: 1Y93.
5. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Pacini L,. Basal turn cochleostomy via the middle fossa route for cochlear implant insertion. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 778-784. (Pubitemid 28513632)
6. Kiratzidis T,. 'Veria operation': cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. A new surgical technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 57: 127-130.
7. Hausler R,. Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; 122: 715-719. (Pubitemid 35398882)
8. Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T,. Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 283-285. (Pubitemid 32324595)
9. Kronenberg J, Baumgartner WD, Migirov L, Dagan T, Hildesheimer M,. The suprameatal approach: an alternative surgical approach to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25: 41-45.
10. Postelmans JT, Grolman W, Tange RA, Stokroos RJ,. Comparison of two approaches to the surgical management of cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1571-1578.
11. Postelmans JT, Tange RA, Stokroos RJ, Grolman W,. The suprameatal approach: a safe alternative surgical technique for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 196-203.
12. Yin S, Chen Z, Wu Y, et al. Suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation in 45 Chinese children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72: 397-403.
13. Gantz BJ, Turner CW,. Combining acoustic and electoral hearing. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 1726-1730.
14. Gantz BJ, Turner C,. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 344-347. (Pubitemid 38797581)
15. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O,. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 348-352. (Pubitemid 38797582)
16. Fraysse B, Macias AR, Sterkers O, et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 624-633. (Pubitemid 44180473)
17. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 123: 272-280. (Pubitemid 38580856)
18. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 481-491. (Pubitemid 40676887)
19. Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T,. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 179-183. (Pubitemid 27146131)
20. Kiefer J, Von Ilberg C, Reimer B, et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss- implications for the indications. Audiology 1998; 37: 382-395. (Pubitemid 29017207)
21. Balkany T, Connell S, Hodges A, et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 1083-1088. (Pubitemid 44863730)
22. Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Melillo P, et al. Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 855-860. (Pubitemid 47025048)
23. Berrettini S, Forli F, Passetti S,. Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122: 246-252. (Pubitemid 351364364)
24. Soda-Merhy A, Gonzalez-Valenzuela L, Tirado-Gutierrez C,. Residual hearing after cochlear implantation: comparison between straight and perimodiolar implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 139: 399-404.
25. Garcia-Ibanez L, Macias A, Morera C, et al. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129: 651-664.