Quantitative analysis of protein phosphorylations and interactions by Multi-Colour IP-FCM as an input for kinetic modelling of signalling networks

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

  Deswal, Sumit ^a   Schulze, Anna K ^b   Höfer, Thomas ^b   Schamel, Wolfgang W A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE ZAP 70; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; CD3 ANTIGEN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; LAT PROTEIN, MOUSE; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HYBRIDOMA; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; MULTICOLOR IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WESTERN BLOTTING; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMMUNOLOGY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

MURINAE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; ANTIGENS, CD3; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; KINETICS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL, ALPHA-BETA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ZAP-70 PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASE;

EID: 79960915174     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022928     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Seet BT, Dikic I, Zhou MM, Pawson T, (2006) Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 473-483.
2. Hunter T, (2000) Signaling-2000 and beyond. Cell 100: 113-127.
3. Kreutz C, Bartolome Rodriguez MM, Maiwald T, Seidl M, Blum HE, et al. (2007) An error model for protein quantification. Bioinformatics 23: 2747-2753.
4. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M, (2004) Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4: 648-655.
5. Wu W, Slastad H, de la Rosa Carrillo D, Frey T, Tjonnfjord G, et al. (2009) Antibody array analysis with label-based detection and resolution of protein size. Mol Cell Proteomics 8: 245-257.
6. Khan IH, Mendoza S, Rhyne P, Ziman M, Tuscano J, et al. (2006) Multiplex analysis of intracellular signaling pathways in lymphoid cells by microbead suspension arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 5: 758-768.
7. Lund-Johansen F, Davis K, Bishop J, de Waal Malefyt R, (2000) Flow cytometric analysis of immunoprecipitates: high-throughput analysis of protein phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions. Cytometry 39: 250-259.
8. Schrum AG, Gil D, Dopfer EP, Wiest DL, Turka LA, et al. (2007) High-sensitivity detection and quantitative analysis of native protein-protein interactions and multiprotein complexes by flow cytometry. Sci STKE 2007.
9. Vignali DA, (2000) Multiplexed particle-based flow cytometric assays. J Immunol Methods 243: 243-255.
10. Elshal MF, McCoy JP, (2006) Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA. Methods 38: 317-323.
11. Morgan E, Varro R, Sepulveda H, Ember JA, Apgar J, et al. (2004) Cytometric bead array: a multiplexed assay platform with applications in various areas of biology. Clin Immunol 110: 252-266.
12. Gingrich JC, Davis DR, Nguyen Q, (2000) Multiplex detection and quantitation of proteins on western blots using fluorescent probes. Biotechniques 29: 636-642.
13. Bronstein I, Voyta JC, Murphy OJ, Bresnick L, Kricka LJ, (1992) Improved chemiluminescent western blotting procedure. Biotechniques 12: 748-753.
14. Schilling M, Maiwald T, Hengl S, Winter D, Kreutz C, et al. (2009) Theoretical and experimental analysis links isoform-specific ERK signalling to cell fate decisions. Mol Syst Biol 5: 334.
15. Davis MM, Boniface JJ, Reich Z, Lyons D, Hampl J, et al. (1998) Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 16: 523-544.
16. Schamel WW, Arechaga I, Risueno RM, van Santen HM, Cabezas P, et al. (2005) Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med 202: 493-503.
17. Alarcon B, Swamy M, van Santen HM, Schamel WW, (2006) T-cell antigen-receptor stoichiometry: pre-clustering for sensitivity. EMBO Rep 7: 490-495.
18. Iwashima M, Irving BA, van Oers NS, Chan AC, Weiss A, (1994) Sequential interactions of the TCR with two distinct cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases. Science 263: 1136-1139.
19. Weiss A, (1993) T cell antigen receptor signal transduction: a tale of tails and cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinases. Cell 73: 209-212.
20. Wang H, Kadlecek TA, Au-Yeung BB, Goodfellow HE, Hsu LY, et al. (2010) ZAP-70: an essential kinase in T-cell signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a002279.
21. Weissenhorn W, Eck MJ, Harrison SC, Wiley DC, (1996) Phosphorylated T cell receptor zeta-chain and ZAP70 tandem SH2 domains form a 1:3 complex in vitro. Eur J Biochem 238: 440-445.
22. Au-Yeung BB, Deindl S, Hsu LY, Palacios EH, Levin SE, et al. (2009) The structure, regulation, and function of ZAP-70. Immunol Rev 228: 41-57.
23. Deindl S, Kadlecek TA, Brdicka T, Cao X, Weiss A, et al. (2007) Structural basis for the inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity of ZAP-70. Cell 129: 735-746.
24. Deindl S, Kadlecek TA, Cao X, Kuriyan J, Weiss A, (2009) Stability of an autoinhibitory interface in the structure of the tyrosine kinase ZAP-70 impacts T cell receptor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20699-20704.
25. Chan AC, Dalton M, Johnson R, Kong GH, Wang T, et al. (1995) Activation of ZAP-70 kinase activity by phosphorylation of tyrosine 493 is required for lymphocyte antigen receptor function. EMBO J 14: 2499-2508.
26. Di Bartolo V, Mege D, Germain V, Pelosi M, Dufour E, et al. (1999) Tyrosine 319, a newly identified phosphorylation site of ZAP-70, plays a critical role in T cell antigen receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 274: 6285-6294.
27. Brdicka T, Kadlecek TA, Roose JP, Pastuszak AW, Weiss A, (2005) Intramolecular regulatory switch in ZAP-70: analogy with receptor tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell Biol 25: 4924-4933.
28. Watts JD, Affolter M, Krebs DL, Wange RL, Samelson LE, et al. (1994) Identification by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of the sites of tyrosine phosphorylation induced in activated Jurkat T cells on the protein tyrosine kinase ZAP-70. J Biol Chem 269: 29520-29529.
29. Acuto O, Di Bartolo V, Michel F, (2008) Tailoring T-cell receptor signals by proximal negative feedback mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 699-712.
30. Reth M, (2002) Hydrogen peroxide as second messenger in lymphocyte activation. Nat Immunol 3: 1129-1134.
31. Wienands J, Larbolette O, Reth M, (1996) Evidence for a preformed transducer complex organized by the B cell antigen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 7865-7870.
32. Secrist JP, Burns LA, Karnitz L, Koretzky GA, Abraham RT, (1993) Stimulatory effects of the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate, on T-cell activation events. J Biol Chem 268: 5886-5893.
33. Hedrick SM, Matis LA, Hecht TT, Samelson LE, Longo DL, et al. (1982) The fine specificity of antigen and Ia determinant recognition by T cell hybridoma clones specific for pigeon cytochrome c. Cell 30: 141-152.
34. O'Shea JJ, Ashwell JD, Bailey TL, Cross SL, Samelson LE, et al. (1991) Expression of v-src in a murine T-cell hybridoma results in constitutive T-cell receptor phosphorylation and interleukin 2 production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 1741-1745.
35. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, et al. (1994) T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76: 17-27.
36. van Oers NS, Killeen N, Weiss A, (1994) ZAP-70 is constitutively associated with tyrosine-phosphorylated TCR zeta in murine thymocytes and lymph node T cells. Immunity 1: 675-685.
37. Pelosi M, Di Bartolo V, Mounier V, Mege D, Pascussi JM, et al. (1999) Tyrosine 319 in the interdomain B of ZAP-70 is a binding site for the Src homology 2 domain of Lck. J Biol Chem 274: 14229-14237.
38. Schilling M, Maiwald T, Bohl S, Kollmann M, Kreutz C, et al. (2005) Quantitative data generation for systems biology: the impact of randomisation, calibrators and normalisers. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 152: 193-200.
39. Ciaccio MF, Wagner JP, Chuu CP, Lauffenburger DA, Jones RB, (2010) Systems analysis of EGF receptor signaling dynamics with microwestern arrays. Nat Methods 7: 148-155.
40. Sachs K, Perez O, Pe'er D, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP, (2005) Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 308: 523-529.
41. Bridgeman JS, Blaylock M, Hawkins RE, Gilham DE, (2010) Development of a flow cytometric co-immunoprecipitation technique for the study of multiple protein-protein interactions and its application to T-cell receptor analysis. Cytometry A 77: 338-346.
42. Swamy M, Minguet S, Siegers GM, Alarcon B, Schamel WW, (2007) A native antibody-based mobility-shift technique (NAMOS-assay) to determine the stoichiometry of multiprotein complexes. J Immunol Methods 324: 74-83.
43. Minguet S, Swamy M, Alarcon B, Luescher IF, Schamel WW, (2007) Full activation of the T cell receptor requires both clustering and conformational changes at CD3. Immunity 26: 43-54.
44. Schrum AG, (2009) Visualization of multiprotein complexes by flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter 5 pp. Unit5 9.
45. Deswal S, Beck-Garcia K, Blumenthal B, Dopfer EP, Schamel WW, (2010) Detection of phosphorylated T and B cell antigen receptor species by Phos-tag SDS- and Blue Native-PAGE. Immunol Lett 130: 51-56.