Habituation measured by pattern reversal visual evoked potentials depends more on check size than reversal rate

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1846-1853

  Omland, Petter M ^a   Nilsen, Kristian B ^a,b   Sand, Trond ^a,c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Habituation; Migraine; VEP; Visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960891061     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.025     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Afra J., Ambrosini A., Genicot R., Albert A., Schoenen J. Influence of colors on habituation of visual evoked potentials in patients with migraine with aura and in healthy volunteers. Headache 2000, 40:36-40.
2. Afra J., Cecchini A.P., De Pasqua V., Albert A., Schoenen J. Visual evoked potentials during long periods of pattern-reversal stimulation in migraine. Brain 1998, 121:233-241.
3. Afra J., Proietti Cecchini A., Sandor P.S., Schoenen J. Comparison of visual and auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1124-1129.
4. Ambrosini A., Rossi P., De Pasqua V., Pierelli F., Schoenen J. Lack of habituation causes high intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine. Brain 2003, 126:2009-2015.
5. Angelini L., de Tommaso M., Guido M., Hu K., Ivanov P., Marinazzo D., et al. Steady-state visual evoked potentials and phase synchronization in migraine patients. Phys Rev Lett 2004, 93:038103.
6. Baccus S.A., Meister M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 2002, 36:909-919.
7. Bartel P.R., Vos A. Induced refractive errors and pattern electroretinograms and pattern visual evoked potentials: implications for clinical assessments. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 92:78-81.
8. Bohotin V., Fumal A., Vandenheede M., Gerard P., Bohotin C., Maertens de Noordhout A., et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine. Brain 2002, 125:912-922.
9. Brigell M., Bach M., Barber C., Kawasaki K., Kooijman A. Guidelines for calibration of stimulus and recording parameters used in clinical electrophysiology of vision. Calibration Standard Committee of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV). Doc Ophthalmol 1998, 95:1-14.
10. Brown S.P., Masland R.H. Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:44-51.
11. Celesia G.G., Kaufman D., Cone S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 68:161-171.
12. Clifford C.W., Webster M.A., Stanley G.B., Stocker A.A., Kohn A., Sharpee T.O., et al. Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Res 2007, 47:3125-3131.
13. Coppola G., Ambrosini A., Di Clemente L., Magis D., Fumal A., Gerard P., et al. Interictal abnormalities of gamma band activity in visual evoked responses in migraine: an indication of thalamocortical dysrhythmia?. Cephalalgia 2007, 27:1360-1367.
14. Coppola G., Curra A., Serrao M., Di Lorenzo C., Gorini M., Porretta E., et al. Lack of cold pressor test-induced effect on visual-evoked potentials in migraine. J Headache Pain 2010, 11:115-121.
15. Coppola G., Pierelli F., Schoenen J. Habituation and migraine. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009, 92:249-259.
16. Coppola G., Serrao M., Curra A., Di Lorenzo C., Vatrika M., Parisi V., et al. Tonic pain abolishes cortical habituation of visual evoked potentials in healthy subjects. J Pain 2009, 11:291-296.
17. 2 laser-evoked responses during interictal phase of migraine. J Headache Pain 2005, 6:195-198.
18. de Tommaso M., Sciruicchio V., Bellotti R., Castellano M., Tota P., Guido M., et al. Discrimination between migraine patients and normal subjects based on steady state visual evoked potentials: discriminant analysis and artificial neural network classifiers. Funct Neurol 1997, 12:333-338.
19. de Tommaso M., Sciruicchio V., Guido M., Sasanelli G., Specchio L.M., Puca F.M. EEG spectral analysis in migraine without aura attacks. Cephalalgia 1998, 18:324-328.
20. de Tommaso M., Stramaglia S., Schoffelen J.M., Guido M., Libro G., Losito L., et al. Steady-state visual evoked potentials in the low frequency range in migraine: a study of habituation and variability phenomena. Int J Psychophysiol 2003, 49:165-174.
21. Di Clemente L., Coppola G., Magis D., Fumal A., De Pasqua V., Schoenen J. Nociceptive blink reflex and visual evoked potential habituations are correlated in migraine. Headache 2005, 45:1388-1393.
22. Di Clemente L., Coppola G., Magis D., Gerardy P.Y., Fumal A., De Pasqua V., et al. Nitroglycerin sensitises in healthy subjects CNS structures involved in migraine pathophysiology: evidence from a study of nociceptive blink reflexes and visual evoked potentials. Pain 2009, 144:156-161.
23. Evers S., Bauer B., Suhr B., Husstedt I.W., Grotemeyer K.H. Cognitive processing in primary headache: a study on event-related potentials. Neurology 1997, 48:108-113.
24. Fairhall A.L., Lewen G.D., Bialek W., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412:787-792.
25. Fumal A., Bohotin V., Vandenheede M., Seidel L., de Pasqua V., de Noordhout A.M., et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 2003, 150:332-340.
26. Fumal A., Coppola G., Bohotin V., Gerardy P.Y., Seidel L., Donneau A.F., et al. Induction of long-lasting changes of visual cortex excitability by five daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers and migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2006, 26:143-149.
27. Gopfert E., Muller R., Breuer D., Greenlee M.W. Similarities and dissimilarities between pattern VEPs and motion VEPs. Doc Ophthalmol 1998, 97:67-79.
28. Greenlee M.W., Heitger F. The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Res 1988, 28:791-797.
29. Heinrich S.P., Bach M. Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 2001, 102:141-156.
30. Heinrich T.S., Bach M. Contrast adaptation in retinal and cortical evoked potentials: no adaptation to low spatial frequencies. Vis Neurosci 2002, 19:645-650.
31. Heinrich T.S., Bach M. Contrast adaptation: paradoxical effects when the temporal frequencies of adaptation and test differ. Vis Neurosci 2002, 19:421-426.
32. Holder G.E., Celesia G.G., Miyake Y., Tobimatsu S., Weleber R.G. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology: recommendations for visual system testing. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:1393-1409.
33. Holliday I.E., Ruddock K.H. Two spatio-temporal filters in human vision. 1. Temporal and spatial frequency response characteristics. Biol Cybern 1983, 47:173-190.
34. Judit A., Sandor P.S., Schoenen J. Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2000, 20:714-719.
35. Kandel E.R. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. Principles of neural science 2000, 1247-1279. McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, New York. 4th ed. E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz, T.M. Jessell (Eds.).
36. Knott J.R., Irwin D.A. Anxiety, stress, and the contingent negative variation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973, 29:538-541.
37. Kropp P., Gerber W.D. Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation?. Cephalalgia 1993, 13:37-41.
38. Lehtonen J.B. Visual evoked cortical potentials for single flashes and flickering light in migraine. Headache 1974, 14:1-12.
39. Magis D., Allena M., Coppola G., Di Clemente L., Gerard P., Schoenen J. Search for correlations between genotypes and electrophysiological patterns in migraine: the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and visual evoked potentials. Cephalalgia 2007, 27:1142-1149.
40. Manahilov V., Vassilev A. The effect of standing contrast and pattern adaptation on the human visually evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986, 64:536-545.
41. Nyrke T., Kangasniemi P., Lang A.H. Difference of steady-state visual evoked potentials in classic and common migraine. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989, 73:285-294.
42. Nyrke T., Lang A.H. Spectral analysis of visual potentials evoked by sine wave modulated light in migraine. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982, 53:436-442.
43. Ochs A.L., Aminoff M.J. The effect of adaptation to the stimulating pattern on the latency and wave form of visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980, 48:502-508.
44. Oelkers R., Grosser K., Lang E., Geisslinger G., Kobal G., Brune K., et al. Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency. Brain 1999, 122:1147-1155.
45. Ozkul Y., Bozlar S. Effects of fluoxetine on habituation of pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in migraine prophylaxis. Headache 2002, 42:582-587.
46. Ozkul Y., Uckardes A. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in migraine. Eur J Neurol 2002, 9:227-232.
47. Peachey N.S., DeMarco P.J., Ubilluz R., Yee W. Short-term changes in the response characteristics of the human visual evoked potential. Vision Res 1994, 34:2823-2831.
48. Rankin C.H., Abrams T., Barry R.J., Bhatnagar S., Clayton D.F., Colombo J., et al. Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009, 92:135-138.
49. Sand T. Statistical properties of ABR amplitudes and latencies. Implications for computation of reference limits and relation to click phase. Scand Audiol 1990, 19:131-137.
50. Sand T., Vingen J.V. Visual, long-latency auditory and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in migraine: relation to pattern size, stimulus intensity, sound and light discomfort thresholds and pre-attack state. Cephalalgia 2000, 20:804-820.
51. Sand T., Zhitniy N., White L.R., Stovner L.J. Brainstem auditory-evoked potential habituation and intensity-dependence related to serotonin metabolism in migraine: a longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:1190-1200.
52. Sand T., Zhitniy N., White L.R., Stovner L.J. Visual evoked potential latency, amplitude and habituation in migraine: a longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:1020-1027.
53. Sappey-Marinier D., Calabrese G., Fein G., Hugg J.W., Biggins C., Weiner M.W. Effect of photic stimulation on human visual cortex lactate and phosphates using 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992, 12:584-592.
54. Schoenen J. Deficient habituation of evoked cortical potentials in migraine: a link between brain biology, behavior and trigeminovascular activation?. Biomed Pharmacother 1996, 50:71-78.
55. Schoenen J., Maertens de Noordhout A., Timsit-Berthier M., Timsit M. Contingent negative variation and efficacy of beta-blocking agents in migraine. Cephalalgia 1986, 6:229-233.
56. Schoenen J., Wang W., Albert A., Delawaide P.J. Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 1995, 2:115-122.
57. Sclar G., Lennie P., DePriest D.D. Contrast adaptation in striate cortex of macaque. Vision Res 1989, 29:747-755.
58. Sharpee T.O., Sugihara H., Kurgansky A.V., Rebrik S.P., Stryker M.P., Miller K.D. Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature 2006, 439:936-942.
59. Shibata K., Yamane K., Iwata M., Ohkawa S. Evaluating the effects of spatial frequency on migraines by using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:2220-2227.
60. Shibata K., Yamane K., Otuka K., Iwata M. Abnormal visual processing in migraine with aura: a study of steady-state visual evoked potentials. J Neurol Sci 2008, 271:119-126.
61. Siniatchkin M., Averkina N., Andrasik F., Stephani U., Gerber W.D. Neurophysiological reactivity before a migraine attack. Neurosci Lett 2006, 400:121-124.
62. Skuse N.F., Burke D. Sequence-dependent deterioration in the visual evoked potential in the absence of drowsiness. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 84:20-25.
63. Smirnakis S.M., Berry M.J., Warland D.K., Bialek W., Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 1997, 386:69-73.
64. Thompson R.F., Spencer W.A. Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev 1966, 73:16-43.
65. Tootell R.B., Silverman M.S., Hamilton S.L., Switkes E., De Valois R.L. Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. V. Spatial frequency. J Neurosci 1988, 8:1610-1624.
66. Valeriani M., de Tommaso M., Restuccia D., Le Pera D., Guido M., Iannetti G.D., et al. Reduced habituation to experimental pain in migraine patients: a CO(2) laser evoked potential study. Pain 2003, 105:57-64.
67. Wang W., Schoenen J. Interictal potentiation of passive "oddball" auditory event-related potentials in migraine. Cephalalgia 1998, 18:261-265. discussion 41.
68. Wang W., Timsit-Berthier M., Schoenen J. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials is pronounced in migraine: an indication of cortical potentiation and low serotonergic neurotransmission?. Neurology 1996, 46:1404-1409.
69. Wang W., Wang G.P., Ding X.L., Wang Y.H. Personality and response to repeated visual stimulation in migraine and tension-type headaches. Cephalalgia 1999, 19:718-724. discussion 697-8.