Similarities and dissimilarities between pattern VEPs and motion VEPs

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-79

  Göpfert, Edith ^a   Müller, Rolf ^a   Breuer, David ^a   Greenlee, Mark W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Contrast dependence; Motion VEP; N200 wave; P100 wave; Pattern VEP

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE TRACT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; WAVEFORM;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0032317076     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1001888618774     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Zeki S, Watson JDG, Lueck CJ, Friston KJ, Kennard C, Frackowiak RSJ. A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 641-649.
2. Tootell RBH, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Malach R, Born RT, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 3215-3230.
3. Smith AT, Greenlee MW, Singh KD, Kraemer FM, Hennig J. The processing of first- and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J Neurosci 1998; 18: 3816-3830.
4. Nealey TA, Maunsell JHR. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to the response of neurons in macaque striate cortex. J Neurosci 1994; 14: 2069-2079.
5. Maunsell JHR, Nealey TA, DePriest DD. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 3323-3334.
6. Mackie RT, McCulloch DL, Bradnam MS, Glegg M, Evans AL. The effect of motion on pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in adults and children. Doc Ophthalmol 1996; 91: 371-380.
7. Bach M, Ullrich D. Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: Interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component. Vision Res 1997; 37: 1845-1849.
8. Kubova Z, Kuba M, Spekreijse H, Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 1995; 35: 197-205.
9. Sclar G, Maunsell JHR, Lennie P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Res 1990; 30: 1-10.
10. Müller R, Greenlee MW. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Vision Res 1994; 34: 2071-2091.
11. Anderson SJ, Holliday JE, Singh KD, Harding GFA. Localization and functional analysis of human cortical area V5 using magneto-encephalography. Proc R Soc Lond B 1996; 263: 423-431.
12. Göpfert E, Müller R, Hartwig M. Effects of movement adaptation on movement - visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthal Proc Series 1984; 40: 321-324.
13. Probst T, Wist ER. Electrophysiological evidence for visual-vestibular interaction in man. Neurosci Lett 1990; 108: 255-260.
14. Göpfert E, Müller R, Markwardt F, Schlykowa L. Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei Musterbewegung. Z EEG-EMG 1983; 14: 47-51.
15. Schlykowa L, van Dijk BW, Ehrenstein WH. Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man. Cognitive Brain Res 1993; 1: 169-174.
16. Bach M, Ullrich D. Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials. Vis Res 1994; 34: 1541-1547.