Cognitive processing in primary headache: A study on event-related potentials

Neurology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 108-113

  Evers, Stefan ^a   Bauer, B ^a   Suhr, B ^a   Husstedt, I W ^a   Grotemeyer, K H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031028411     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.48.1.108     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Böcker KBE, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J, Brunia CHM. Contingent negative variation in migraine. Headache 1990;30: 604-609.
2. Maertens de Noordhout A, Timsit-Berthier M, Timsit M, Schoenen J. Contingent negative variation in headache. Ann Neurol 1986;19:78-80.
3. Kropp P, Gerber WD. Contingent negative variation - findings and perspectives in migraine. Cephalalgia 1993;13:33-36.
4. Schoenen J, Timsit-Berthier M. Contingent negative variation: methods and potential interest in headache. Cephalalgia 1993;13:28-32.
5. Kropp P, Gerber WD. Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation? Cephalalgia 1993;13:37-41.
6. Kropp P, Gerber WD. Contingent negative variation during migraine attack and interval: evidence for normalization of slow cortical potentials during the attack. Cephalalgia 1995; 15:123-128.
7. Besken E, Pothmann R, Sartor G. Contingent negative variation in childhood migraine. Cephalalgia 1993;13:42-43.
8. Bauer B, Kurlemann G, Suhr B, Evers S. Visual event-related potentials in childhood and adolescence primary headache. Cephalalgia 1995;15(Suppl 16):30.
9. Drake ME, Pakalnis A, Padamadan H. Long-latency auditory event-related potentials in migraine. Headache 1989;29:238-240.
10. Grotemeyer KH, Schlake HP, Husstedt I. Event-related potentials and reaction-time in migraine patients. Cephalalgia 1991;11(Suppl 11):71-72.
11. Caekebeke JFV, van Dijk JG, Ferrari MD. Auditory event-related potentials change during migraine attacks without aura. Cephalalgia 1989;9(S10):109-110.
12. Schoenen J Jamart B, Maertens de Noordhout A, de Pasqua V, Delwaide PJ. Auditory event-related potentials in migraine. Cephalalgia 1989;9(S10):113-114.
13. Mazzotta G, Alberti A, Santucci A, Gallai V. The event-related potential P300 during headache-free period and spontaneous attack in adult headache sufferers. Headache 1995;35:210-215.
14. Woestenburg JC, Kramer CJ, Orlebeke JF, Passchier J. Brain potential differences related to spatial attention in migraineurs with and without aura symptoms support differences in activation. Headache 1993;33:413-416.
15. Wang W, Schoenen J, Timsit-Berthier M. Cognitive functions in migraine without aura between attacks: a psychophysiological approach using the oddball paradigma. Neurophysiol Clin 1995;25:3-11.
16. Nagel-Leiby S, Welch KMA, D'Andrea G, Grunfeld S, Brown E. Event-related potentials and associated catecholamine function in migraine. Cephalalgia 1990;10:317-329.
17. Evers S, Suhr B, Grotemeyer KH. The influence of subcutaneous sumatriptan on visually evoked event-related potentials. In: Clifford Rose F, ed. New advances in headache research. Vol 4. London: Smith-Gordon, 1994:105-108.
18. Maertens de Noordhout A, Timsit-Berthier M, Timsit M, Schoenen J. Effect of beta-blockade on contingent negative variation in migraine. Ann Neurol 1987;21:111-112.
19. Schoenen J, Maertens de Noordhout A, Timsit-Berthier M, Timsit M. Contingent negative variation and efficacy of betablocking agents in migraine. Cephalalgia 1986;6:229-233.
20. Göbel H, Krapat S, Ensink FB, Soyka D. Comparison of contingent negative variation between migraine interval and migraine attack before and after treatment with sumatriptan. Headache 1993;33:570-572.
21. Grotemeyer KH, Husstedt IW, Settelmayer J, Stuppe M. Optically elicited event-related potentials and reaction time in healthy persons, migraine patients without ergotamine and those under ergotamine therapy. In: Clifford Rose, F, ed. New advances in headache research. Vol 3. London: Smith-Gordon, 1994:61-64.
22. Bauer B, Evers S, Schmidt F, Husstedt IW. Reversibility of cognitive dysfunction in ergotamine abuse. Cephalalgia 1995; 15(Suppl 14):138.
23. Schoenen J. Clinical neurophysiology studies in headache: a review of data and pathophysiological hints. Funct Neurol 1992;7:191-204.
24. Donchin E, Coles MGH. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 1988;11:357-374.
25. Ford JM, Mohs RC, Pfefferbaum A, Kopell BS. On the utility of P3 latency and RT for studying cognitive processes. Prog Brain Res 1980;54:661-667.
26. Geisler MW, Polich J. P300 habituation from visual stimuli? Physiol Behav 1994;56:511-516.
27. Simons R, Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Fiorito F, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. Evocation and habituation of autonomic and event-related potential responses in a nonsignal environment. J Psychophysiol 1987;1:45-59.
28. Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988; 8(Suppl 7):1-96.
29. Goodin D, Desmedt J, Maurer K, Nuwer M. IFCN recommended standards for long-latency auditory event-related potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. Neurophysiol Clin 1994;91:18-20.
30. Schoenen J, Wang W, Albert W, Delwaide PH. Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 1995;2: 1-8.
31. Mortimer M, Good P, Marsters J, Addy D. Visual evoked responses in children with migraine: a diagnostic tool. Lancet 1990;335:75-77.
32. Maertens de Noordhout A, Wang W, Schoenen J. Clinical neurophysiology and neurotransmitters. Cephalalgia 1995;15: 301-309.