Agency, Simulation and Self-identification

Mind and Language

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 113-146

  Jeannerod, Marc ^a   Pacherie, Elisabeth ^b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1942506671     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00251.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Baldwin, T. 1995: Objectivity, causality, and agency. In J.L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel and N. Eilan (eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 107-125.
2. Beardsworth, T., and Buckner, T. 1981: The ability to recognize oneself from a video-recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 19-22.
3. Bertenthal, B.I., Profitt, D.R., and Cutting, J.E. 1984: Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 213-230.
4. Binet, A. 1886: La Psychologie du Raisonnement, Recherches Expérimentales par l'Hypnotisme, Paris, Alcan.
5. Bisiach, E. and Berti A. 1987: Dyschiria: an attempt at its systematic explanation. In M. Jeannerod (ed.), Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M. and Frith, C.D. 2002: A framework for understanding abnormalities in the control and awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Science 6, 6, 237-242.
7. Botvinick, M. and Cohen, J., 1998: Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
8. Brewer, B. 1993: The integration of spatial vision and action. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy and B. Brewer (eds), Spatial Representation. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 294-316.
9. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G.R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R.J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G. and Freund, H.-J. 2001: Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.
10. Cassam, Q. 1997: Self and World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Chadwick, P. and Birchwood, M. 1994: The omnipotence of voices. A cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 190-201.
12. Cole, J., and Paillard, J. 1995: Living without touch and information about body position and movement. Studies on deafferented subjects. In J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel and N. Eilan (eds), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 245-266.
13. Cutting, J.E. and Koslowski, L.T. 1977: Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
14. Daprati, E., Franck, N., GeorgiefF, N., Proust, J., Pacherie, E., Dalery, J. and Jeannerod, M. 1997: Looking for the agent. An investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition, 65, 71-86.
15. David, A.S. 1994: The neuropsychological origin of auditory hallucinations. In A.S. David and J.C. Cutting (eds), The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, pp. 269-313.
16. Davidson, D. 1980: Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F. and Fazio, F. 1997: Brain activity during observation of actions: influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain, 120, 1763-1777.
18. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., and Prablanc, C. 1989: The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
19. Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., and Fazio, F. 1994: Mapping motor representations with PET. Nature, 371, 600-602.
20. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., and Rizzolatti G. 1992: Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
21. Dierks, T., Linden, D.E.J., Jandl, M., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Lanferman, H. and Singer, W. 1999: Activation of the Heschl's gyrus during auditory hallucinations. Neuron, 22, 615-621.
22. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. 1995: Motor facilitation during action observation. A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608-2611.
23. Farné, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F. and Ladavas, E., 2000: Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123, 2350-2360.
24. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C.D., Decety, J. and Jeannerod, M. 2003: Modulating the experience of agency: a PET study. Neuroimage, 18, 324-333.
25. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Tiberghien, G., Marie-Cardine, M., Daléry, J., D'Amato, T. and Jeannerod, M.: Confusing the self and the other. Impaired attribution of actions in patients with schizophrenia. (In preparation).
26. Fourneret, P. and Jeannerod, M. 1998: Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133-1140.
27. Fourneret, P., Franck, N., Slachewsky, A. and Jeannerod, M. 2001: Self-monitoring in schizophrenia revisited. NeuroReport, 12, 1203-1208.
28. Frak, V.G., Paulignan, Y. and Jeannerod, M. 2001: Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 120-127.
29. Franck, N., Farrer, C., Georgieff, N., Marie-Cardine, M., Daléry, J. D'Amato, T. and Jeannerod, M. 2001: Defective recognition of one's own actions in schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 454-459.
30. Frith C.D. and Done D.J. 1989: Experiences of alien control in schizophrenia reflect a disorder in the central monitoring of action. Psychological Medicine, 19, 359-363.
31. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.J. and Wolpert D. M. 2000: Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 355, 1771-1788.
32. Frith, C.D. 1992: The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Gallagher, S. 1986: Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 541-554.
34. Gallese V. and Goldman, A. 1998: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 493-501.
35. Georgieff, N. and Jeannerod, M. 1998: Beyond consciousness of external reality. A 'Who' system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 465-477.
36. Gérardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., Poline, J-B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., Agid, Y. and Le Bihan, D. 2000: Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093-1104.
37. Goldman, A.I. 1995: In defense of the simulation theory. In M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Folk-Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 191-206.
38. Goldman, A.I. 2002: Simulation theory and mental concepts. In J. Dokic and J. Proust (eds). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1-20.
39. Gopnik, A. and Meltzoff, N. 1997: Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Gordon, R.M. 1995a: Folk psychology as simulation. In M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Folk-Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 60-73.
41. Gordon, R. M. 1995b: Simulation without introspection or inference from me to you. In M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Mental Simulation. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 53-67.
42. Gordon, R.M. 1996: 'Radical' simulationism. In P. Carruthers and P. K. Smith (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-21.
43. Gould, L.N. 1949; Auditory hallucinations in subvocal speech: objective study in a case of schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 109, 418-427.
44. Grafton, S.T., Arbib, M.A., Fadiga, L. and Rizzolatti, G. 1996: Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
45. Harris, C. S., 1965: Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed and displaced vision. Psychological Review 72, 419-444.
46. Harris, P. 1995: From simulation to folk psychology: The case for development. In M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Folk-Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 207-231.
47. Heal, J. 1994: Simulation vs. theory theory: What is at issue? In C. Peacocke (ed.), Objectivity, Simulation and the Objectivity of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129-144.
48. Heal, J. 1995: How to think about thinking. In M. Davis and T. Stone (eds), Mental Simulation. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 33-52.
49. Heal, J. 1996: Simulation, theory and content. In P. Carruthers and P. Smith (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-89.
50. Hurley, S. 1998: Consciousness in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
51. Jacob, P. and Jeannerod, M. 2003: Ways of seeing. The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. James, W. 1950: The Principles of Psychologloy, 2 vol. New York: Dover.
53. Janet, P. 1937: Les troubles de la personnalité sociale. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, tome II, 149-200.
54. Jeannerod, M. and Frak, V.G. 1999: Mental simulation of action in human subjects. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 9, 735-739.
55. Jeannerod, M. 1994: The representing brain. Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
56. Jeannerod, M. 1997: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford, Blackwell.
57. Jeannerod, M. 1999: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
58. Jeannerod, M. 2001: Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, S103-S109.
59. Jeannerod, M. 2003: Consciousness of action and self-consciousness. A cognitive neuroscience approach. In J. Roessler and N. Eilan (eds), Agency and Self-awareness. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128-149.
60. Johansson, G. 1973: Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
61. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.P., and Viviani, P. 2000: Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: the role of implicit motor competence. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 4, 706-716.
62. Koslowski, L.T. and Cutting J.E. 1977: Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
63. Leslie, A.M. 1994: Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211-38.
64. Lipps, T. 1903: Aesthetik: Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Hamburg: Voss.
65. McDowell, J. 1982: Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy, 68, 455-79.
66. McGuire, P.K., Silbersweig, D.A., Murray, R.M., David, A.S., Frackowiak, R.S.J. and Frith, C.D. 1996: Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 26, 29-38.
67. Milner, A.D. and Goodale, M.A. 1995: The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Mlakar, J., Jensterle, J., and Frith, C.D. 1994: Central monitoring deficiency and schizophrenic symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 24, 557-564.
69. Nielsen, T.I., 1963: Volition: a new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225-230.
70. Orliaguet, J.P., Kandel, S., and Böe, L.J. 1997: Visual perception of motor anticipation in cursive hand writing: influence of spatial and movement information on the prediction of forthcoming letters. Perception, 26, 7, 905-912.
71. Pacherie, E. 1997: Du problème de Molyneux au problème de Bach-y-Rita. In J. Proust (ed.), Perception et Intermodalité, Approches actuelles du Problème de Molyneux. Paris, P.U.F, 1997, pp. 255-293.
72. Paillard, J. 1982: Le corps et ses langages d'espace: Nouvelles contributions psychophysiologiques à l'étude du schéma corporel. In E. Jeddi (ed.), Le Corps en Psychiatrie, Paris: Masson, pp. 53-69.
73. Paillard, J. 1999: Body Schema and Body Image. A double dissociation in deafferented patient. In G.N. Gantchev, S. Mon and J. Massion (eds), Motor Control Today and Tomorrow. Sofia: Academic Publishing House 'Prof. M. Drinov', pp. 197-214.
74. Parsons, L.M. 1994: Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
75. Poincaré, H., 1907: La science et l'hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.
76. Ramachandran, V.S. and Rogers-Ramachandran, D. 1996: Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B263, 377-386.
77. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., and Fogassi, L., 1995: Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
78. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., Perani, D. and Fazio, F. 1996: Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET. 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246-252.
79. Ruby, P. and Decety, J. 2001: Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nature Neurosciences, 4, 546-550.
80. Runeson, S. and Frykholm, G. 1983: Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: expectation, gender, recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology - General, 112, 585-615.
81. Russell, J. 1995: At two with nature: Agency and the development of dualism. In J.L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel and N. Eilan (eds.), The body and the self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 127-151.
82. Schneider, K. 1955: Klinische Psychopathologie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag.
83. Searle, J. 1983: Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Shoemaker, S. 1996: The First-person Perspective and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J.-R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., Dubois, B. and Agid, Y. 1996: The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564-1568.
86. Slachewsky, A., Pillon, B., Fourneret, P. Pradat-Diehl, Jeannerod, M. and Dubois, B. 2001: Preserved adjustment but impaired awareness in a sensory-motor conflict following prefrontal lesions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 332-340.
87. Sperry, R.W. 1950: Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43, 482-489.
88. Stich, S.P. and Nichols, S. 1995: Folk psychology: Simulation or tacit theory. In M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Folk-Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 123-158.
89. Strawson, P.F. 1959: Individuals. London: Routledge.
90. Strawson, P.F. 1966: The Bounds of Sense. London: Routledge.
91. van den Bos, E. and Jeannerod, M. 2002: Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self recognition. Cognition, 85, 177-187.
92. Velleman, J.D. 1989: Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
93. von Holst, E. and Mittelstaedt, H. 1950: Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464-476.
94. Wegner, D. 2002: The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
95. Wittgenstein, L. 1953: Philosophical Investigations, transl. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
96. Wittgenstein, L. 1958: The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.
97. Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z. and Jordan, M. I. 1995: An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880-1882.